Climate policy uncertainty and environmental degradation: Does democracy moderate this relationship?

被引:1
作者
Persakis, Antonios [1 ]
Tsakalos, Ioannis [1 ]
Gkonis, Vasileios [1 ]
Nerantzidis, Michail [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Thessaly, Dept Accounting & Finance, Univ Campus,Geopolis Natl Rd Larissa Trikala, Larisa 41110, Greece
来源
CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS | 2024年 / 15卷
关键词
Climate policy uncertainty; Environmental degradation; Democracy; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; RENEWABLE ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; COUNTRIES; IMPACT; SUSTAINABILITY; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100230
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study investigates the impact of climate policy uncertainty on environmental degradation and examines the moderating role of democracy in this relationship. Utilizing annual data from 126 economies spanning the years 1996-2021, and employing dynamic least squares and fully modified ordinary least squares models, the analysis reveals a significant negative relationship between climate policy uncertainty and environmental degradation. The findings indicate that higher uncertainty in climate policies is associated with reduced environmental degradation, suggesting that uncertainty in climate policies can drive cautious and ecologically conscious behaviors. Additionally, the study finds that democracy amplifies this negative relationship, implying that democratic environments enhance the effectiveness of climate policies in reducing environmental degradation which is attributed to greater transparency, accountability, public participation, and policy stability inherent in democratic systems. The study offers valuable practical implications for policymakers by highlighting how political and economic systems can influence environmental outcomes amid climate change.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   CO2 emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: An augmented VAR approach [J].
Abbasi, Faiza ;
Riaz, Ihalid .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 90 :102-114
[2]   Does democracy really improve environmental quality? Empirical contribution to the environmental politics debate [J].
Acheampong, Alex O. ;
Opoku, Eric Evans Osei ;
Dzator, Janet .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 109
[3]   Urbanization, democracy, bureaucratic quality, and environmental degradation [J].
Adams, Samuel ;
Klobodu, Edem Kwame Mensah .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2017, 39 (06) :1035-1051
[4]   Energy consumption, economic expansion, and CO2 emission in the UK: The role of economic policy uncertainty [J].
Adedoyin, Festus Fatai ;
Zakari, Abdulrasheed .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 738
[5]   Does democracy help reduce environmental degradation? [J].
Akalin, Guray ;
Erdogan, Sinan .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (06) :7226-7235
[6]   The role of renewable energy consumption on environmental degradation in EU countries: do institutional quality, technological innovation, and GDP matter? [J].
Alavijeh, Nooshin Karimi ;
Shadmehri, Mohammad Taher Ahmadi ;
Nazeer, Nazia ;
Zangoei, Samane ;
Dehdar, Fatemeh .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (15) :44607-44624
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Journal of International Development: The Journal of the Development Studies Association, DOI DOI 10.1002/JID.1196
[8]   Do Economic Policy Uncertainty and Geopolitical Risk Lead to Environmental Degradation? Evidence from Emerging Economies [J].
Anser, Muhammad Khalid ;
Syed, Qasim Raza ;
Lean, Hooi Hooi ;
Alola, Andrew Adewale ;
Ahmad, Munir .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (11)
[9]   Impact of economic policy uncertainty on CO2 emissions: evidence from top ten carbon emitter countries [J].
Anser, Muhammad Khalid ;
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Syed, Qasim Raza .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (23) :29369-29378
[10]  
Asghari M., 2013, INT J SCI RES ENV SC, V1, P92, DOI DOI 10.12983/IJSRES-2013-P092-100