Adapting Ethical Sensitivity as a Construct to Study Technology Design Teams

被引：10
作者：
Boyd K.L. [1 ,2 ]
Shilton K. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] University of Maryland, College Park, MD
[2] University of Maryland, College Park, MD
来源：
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction | 2021年 / 5卷 / GROUP期
基金：
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词：
ethics; group work; practices; technology development;
D O I：
10.1145/3463929
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The design of new technologies is a cooperative task (between designers on teams, and between designers and users) with ethical import. Studying technology development teams' engagement with the ethical aspects of their work is important, but engagement with ethical issues is an unobservable construct without agreement on what observable factors comprise it. Ethical sensitivity (ES), a construct studied in medicine, accounting, and other professions, offers a framework of observable factors by operationalizing ethical engagement in workplaces into component parts. However, ES has primarily been studied as a property of individuals rather than groups and in professions outside of computing. This paper uses a corpus of 108 ES studies from 1985-2020 to adapt the framework for studies of technology design teams. From the ES corpus, we build an umbrella framework that conceptualizes ES as comprising the moment of noticing an ethical problem (recognition), the process of building understanding of the situation (particularization), and the decision about what to do (judgment). This framework makes theoretical and methodological contributions to the study of how ethics are operationalized on design teams. We find that ethical sensitivity provides useful language for studies of collaboration and communication around ethics; suggests opportunities for, and evaluations of, ethical interventions for design workplaces; and connects team members' backgrounds, educational experiences, work practices, and organizational factors to design decisions. Simultaneously, existing research in HCI and CSCW addresses the limited range of research methods currently employed in the ES literature, adding rich, contextualized data about situated and embodied ethical practice to the theory. © 2021 Owner/Author.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 106 条
[71]  
Darcia F.N., Moral Perception: A New Construct?, (1996)
[72]  
Nissenbaum H., How computer systems embody values, 34, 3, pp. 120-119, (2001)
[73]  
Denise M.P., Causal Effects of Regulatory, Organizational and Personal Factors on Ethical Sensitivity, (2001)
[74]  
Jacob Tynes Pedersen L., See no evil: Moral sensitivity in the formulation of business problems, 18, 4, pp. 335-348, (2009)
[75]  
Robin R.R., The Effects of Gender and Setting on Accountants' Ethically Sensitive Decisions, (2000)
[76]  
Eric Reidenbach R., Robin D.P., Some Initial Steps Toward Improving the Measurement of Ethical Evaluations of Marketing Activities, pp. 871-879, (1988)
[77]  
Eric Reidenbach R., Robin D.P., Toward the Development of A Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics, (1990)
[78]  
Eric Reidenbach R., Robin D.R., Dawson L., An Application and Extension of A Multidimensional Ethics Scale to Selected Marketing Practices and Marketing Groups, (1991)
[79]  
Rest J., Narvaez D., Bebeau M.J., Thoma S.J., Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, (1999)
[80]  
James R.R., A Psychologist Looks at the Teaching of Ethics, 12, 1, pp. 29-36, (1982)
234567891011