Adapting Ethical Sensitivity as a Construct to Study Technology Design Teams

被引:11
作者
Boyd K.L. [1 ,2 ]
Shilton K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] University of Maryland, College Park, MD
[2] University of Maryland, College Park, MD
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ethics; group work; practices; technology development;
D O I
10.1145/3463929
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The design of new technologies is a cooperative task (between designers on teams, and between designers and users) with ethical import. Studying technology development teams' engagement with the ethical aspects of their work is important, but engagement with ethical issues is an unobservable construct without agreement on what observable factors comprise it. Ethical sensitivity (ES), a construct studied in medicine, accounting, and other professions, offers a framework of observable factors by operationalizing ethical engagement in workplaces into component parts. However, ES has primarily been studied as a property of individuals rather than groups and in professions outside of computing. This paper uses a corpus of 108 ES studies from 1985-2020 to adapt the framework for studies of technology design teams. From the ES corpus, we build an umbrella framework that conceptualizes ES as comprising the moment of noticing an ethical problem (recognition), the process of building understanding of the situation (particularization), and the decision about what to do (judgment). This framework makes theoretical and methodological contributions to the study of how ethics are operationalized on design teams. We find that ethical sensitivity provides useful language for studies of collaboration and communication around ethics; suggests opportunities for, and evaluations of, ethical interventions for design workplaces; and connects team members' backgrounds, educational experiences, work practices, and organizational factors to design decisions. Simultaneously, existing research in HCI and CSCW addresses the limited range of research methods currently employed in the ES literature, adding rich, contextualized data about situated and embodied ethical practice to the theory. © 2021 Owner/Author.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 106 条
[51]  
Jackson S.J., Gillespie T., Payette S., The policy knot: Re-integrating policy, practice and design in cscw studies of social computing, Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (New York, NY, USA, 2014-02-15) (CSCW '14). Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 588-602, (2014)
[52]  
Jacobs A.Z., Wallach H., Measurement and Fairness, (2019)
[53]  
Jafarinaimi N., Nathan L., Hargraves I., Values as Hypotheses: Design, Inquiry, and the Service of Values, 31, 4, pp. 91-104, (2015)
[54]  
Johnson M., Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics, (1993)
[55]  
Jordan J., Taking the First Step Toward a Moral Action: A Review of Moral Sensitivity Measurement across Domains, 168, 3, pp. 323-359, (2007)
[56]  
Lind R., Ethical Sensitivity in Viewer Evaluations of a TV News Investigative Report, 23, 4, pp. 535-561, (1997)
[57]  
Ann Lind R., Rarick D.L., Assessing Ethical Sensitivity in Television News Viewers: A Preliminary Investigation, 10, 2, pp. 69-82, (1995)
[58]  
Ann Lind R., Rarick D.L., Cognitive maps assess news viewer ethical sensitivity, 12, 3, pp. 133-147, (1997)
[59]  
Ann Lind R., Rarick D.L., Viewer Sensitivity to Ethical Issues in TV Coverage of the Clinton-Flowers Scandal, 16, 2, pp. 169-181, (1999)
[60]  
Ann Lind R., Swenson-Lepper T., Measuring Sensitivity to Conflicts of Interest: A Preliminary Test of Method, 19, 1, pp. 43-62, (2013)