Dentists’ Preference toward Fixed Versus Removable Implant Prosthesis on Edentulous Jaws to Improve Quality of Life

被引：20

作者：

Agarwal S. ^{[1
]}

Ashok V. ^{[1
]}

Maiti S. ^{[1
]}

Agarwal V. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Tamil Nadu, Chennai

来源：

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants | 2022年 / 33卷 / 01期

关键词：

edentulous mandible; edentulous maxilla; implant-supported prosthesis; innovation;

D O I：

10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022038746

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Implants that can be used in the prosthetic rehabilitation of full and partial edentulous patients are now frequently used due to advances in dentistry. The aim of the study is to find the prevalence of implant supported fixed vs. removable prosthesis and associated quality of life evaluation. A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted in an institution, on randomly selected individuals. The study group consisted of adult patients who attended the outpatient Department of Prosthodontics from June 2019-March 2020. Eighty-six thousand (86,000) case sheets were evaluated and Chi-square test, independent t-test and frequency analysis were used to explore the relationship between two variables. Out of the patients, 76.5% preferred fixed prosthesis while 23.5% chose removable prosthesis. Females preferred fixed prosthesis over removable. The young-old age group had more removable prosthesis compared to the middle-and elderly age group. Patients with implant supported fixed dental prosthesis had a better quality of life compared with patients with implant supported overdentures. Esthetic and functional rehabilitation is a preferred option females generally care more about their teeth and looks so wanted more fixed options. The young-old age group preferred removable prosthesis over fixed prosthesis. Patients with implant supported fixed dental prosthesis have a better quality of life compared with patients with implant supported overdentures. © 2023 by Begell House, Inc.

引用

页码：83 / 89

页数：6

共 35 条

[1]

Karabuda C, Yaltrk M, Bayraktar M., A clinical comparison of prosthetic complications of implant-supported overdentures with different attachment systems, Implant Dent, 17, pp. 74-81, (2008)

[2]

Waddell JN, Ichim I, Lee H, Fangtao L, Payne AG, Swain MV., Fatigue failures of bar-attachment brazed joints for implant-supported overdentures, Eng Fract Mech, 74, 7, pp. 1148-1159, (2007)

[3]

Jyothi S, Robin PK, Ganapathy D., Periodontal health status of three different groups wearing temporary partial denture, Res J Pharm Technol, 10, 12, pp. 4339-4342, (2017)

[4]

Gervais MJ, Hatzipanagiotis P, Wilson PR., Cross-pin-ning: The philosophy of retrievability applied practically to fixed, implant-supported prostheses, Aust Dent J, 53, pp. 74-82, (2008)

[5]

Abduo J, Bennani V, Lyons K, Waddell N, Swain M., A novel in vitro approach to assess the fit of implant frame-works, Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, 6, pp. 658-663, (2011)

[6]

Misch CE., Prosthetic options in implant dentistry, Int J Oral Implantol, 7, 2, pp. 17-21, (1991)

[7]

Loza-Herrero MA, Rivas-Tumanyan S, Morou-Bermudez E., Success and complications of implant-retained prostheses provided by the post-doctoral prosthodontics program, University of Puerto Rico: A cross-sectional study, J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp. 637-643, (2015)

[8]

Hanif A, Qureshi S, Sheikh Z, Rashid H., Complications in implant dentistry, Eur J Dent, 11, 1, pp. 135-140, (2017)

[9]

Chang H-S, Hsieh Y-D, Hsu M-L., Long-term survival rate of implant-supported overdentures with various attachment systems: A 20-year retrospective study, J Dent Sci, 10, pp. 55-60, (2015)

[10]

Boujoual I, El Yamani A, Andoh A., Single dental resto-ration by resin bonded bridge: Decision criteria and success factors, Int J Adv Res, 6, pp. 203-207, (2018)

← 1 2 3 4 →