Comparison of Fouling Behavior in Cellulose Triacetate Membranes Applied in Forward and Reverse Osmosis

被引:0
|
作者
Chiao, Yu-Hsuan [1 ]
Nakagawa, Keizo [1 ,2 ]
Matsuba, Mayu [2 ]
Okamoto, Masanao [2 ]
Shintani, Takuji [1 ,2 ]
Sasaki, Yuji [1 ]
Yoshioka, Tomohisa [1 ,2 ]
Kamio, Eiji [1 ,3 ]
Wickramasinghe, S. Ranil [4 ]
Matsuyama, Hideto [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Research Center for Membrane and Film Technology, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Kobe, Nada,657-8501, Japan
[2] Graduate School of Science, Technology and Innovation, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Kobe, Nada,657-8501, Japan
[3] Department of Chemical Science and Engineering, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai Kobe, Nada,657-8501, Japan
[4] Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville,AR,72701, United States
来源
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Alginate - Cellulose - Membrane fouling - Membranes - Reverse osmosis - Silica - Sols;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Membrane fouling is inevitable during the membrane separation process. The difference in the driving force of reverse osmosis (RO) and forward osmosis (FO) affects the behavior of foulants. Thus, in this work, we examined the behavior of different foulants during the FO or RO process, including before and after physical cleaning of the membrane. The foulants used were alginate (Alg-Na), humic acid (HA), bovine serum albumin (BSA), and colloidal silica. The commercial cellulose triacetate membrane was used for both FO and RO processes to investigate the behavior of foulants fairly. During the RO process, the formation of the gel network between alginate and calcium ions tends to accumulate on the surface of the membrane, leading to the formation of a dense layer of the foulant, consequently decreasing the flux. Having HA in the feed, RO and FO processes had a similar flux decline, whereas having alginate and BSA, the flux decline during the RO process was higher than the FO process. When colloidal silica was presented in the feed, the membrane in the RO process had constant flux throughout the testing, whereas the membrane in the FO process had a remarkable decrease in flux. Silicas were adhered more on the membrane tested in FO. It was presumed that the reverse salt diffusion facilitates the aggregation of the silica on the membrane surface, leading to a reduction of flux by cake-enhanced concentration polarization in the foulant layer of silica. Therefore, the foulant properties, type of draw solution, the structure of the foulant layer, and the interaction between the foulant and membrane are important to consider in the fouling behavior in RO and FO processes. This understanding of the fouling behavior in the FO process will lead to the development of the optimum FO process. © 2022 American Chemical Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15345 / 15354
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of organic acids on the performance of cellulose triacetate forward osmosis membrane
    Kong, Yafang
    Zheng, Xiaopeng
    Chen, Gui-E
    Xu, Zhenliang
    Wu, Hailing
    Wang, Yang
    POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2019, 59 : E138 - E145
  • [42] Tuning the pore features of cellulose acetate/cellulose triacetate membranes via post-casting solvent treatment for forward osmosis
    Jazini, Fahhame
    Karimi, Mohammad
    Azari, Sara
    CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS, 2021, 255
  • [43] Characterisation of (bio)fouling on used reverse osmosis membranes
    Raulio, M.
    Juvonen, R.
    Alakomi, H. L.
    Ekman, J.
    Hesampour, M.
    Lundin, T.
    EUROMEMBRANE CONFERENCE 2012, 2012, 44 : 931 - 933
  • [44] Fouling of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration membranes: A critical review
    Goosen, MFA
    Sablani, SS
    Ai-Hinai, H
    Ai-Obeidani, S
    Al-Belushi, R
    Jackson, D
    SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 39 (10) : 2261 - 2297
  • [45] Combined Precipitative and Colloidal Fouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes
    Wang, Fulin
    Shi, Hang
    Tarabara, Volodymyr V.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 145 (08)
  • [46] Evaluating impact of fouling on reverse osmosis membranes performance
    Pena, N.
    Gallego, S.
    del Vigo, F.
    Chesters, S. P.
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2013, 51 (4-6) : 958 - 968
  • [47] Scalable anti-fouling reverse osmosis membranes
    McVerry, Brian T.
    Wong, Mavis C. Y.
    Marambio-Jones, Catalina
    Marsh, Kristofer L.
    Hoek, Eric M. V.
    Kaner, Richard B.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [48] BACTERIAL ADHESION AND FOULING OF REVERSE-OSMOSIS MEMBRANES
    RIDGWAY, HF
    RIGBY, MG
    ARGO, DG
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 1985, 77 (07): : 97 - 106
  • [49] Interactions controlling biopolymer fouling of reverse osmosis membranes
    Kim, Suhan
    Hoek, Eric M. V.
    DESALINATION, 2007, 202 (1-3) : 333 - 342
  • [50] Fabrication and Antibacterial Properties of Cellulose Triacetate/Chitosan Reverse Osmosis Membrane
    Liao, Liang
    Fei, Peng-fei
    Cheng, Bo-wen
    Meng, Jian-qiang
    Hu, Xiao-yu
    Song, Jun
    ACTA POLYMERICA SINICA, 2018, (05): : 607 - 616