Error analysis and visualization of 3D geological models of mineral deposits

被引:1
作者
Chen, Yingxian [1 ]
Ma, Huiru [1 ]
Zhu, Zhe [1 ]
Fu, Jiepeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Liaoning Tech Univ, Coll Mines, Fuxin 123000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Error; Geological model; Mineral deposits; Kriging interpolation; Visualization; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.106366
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The accuracy of 3D geological models of mineral deposits has a significant impact on the precision and reliability of mining production decisions. High-precision 3D geological models can provide more accurate geological information of mineral deposits. A scientific error analysis method is proposed to quantify the errors in geological models and visualize these errors by assigning them to geological model entities. The errors in 3D geological models of mineral deposits mainly originate from modeling data and interpolation methods. By analyzing the generation and processing of modeling data, an error model for the modeling data is established. The Kriging interpolation method is used to quantitatively describe the errors in the modeling methods, and these errors are integrated into the 3D geological model. By using Boolean operations, the 3D geological model is combined with the open-pit mine entity model to generate an error-containing mining site model and mined rock model, and to calculate their mining and stripping volumes and errors, achieving error visualization. Using an open-pit coal mine in Inner Mongolia as a case study, the construction of its 3D mineral deposit and mining field models demonstrates the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method in practical applications, highlighting its importance in improving the accuracy and reliability of mining production decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Enhancing groundwater salinity estimation through integrated GMDH and geostatistical techniques to minimize Kriging interpolation error [J].
Amini, Hamed ;
Ashrafzadeh, Afshin ;
Khaledian, Mohammadreza .
EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2024, 17 (01) :283-297
[2]  
Berggren M., 2024, Coefficients of determination measured on the same scale as the outcome: Alternatives to R2 that use standard deviations instead of explained variance
[3]   Uncertainty in structural interpretation: Lessons to be learnt [J].
Bond, Clare E. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY, 2015, 74 :185-200
[4]   Three-Dimensional Geological Modeling of Coal Seams Using Weighted Kriging Method and Multi-Source Data [J].
Che, Defu ;
Jia, Qingren .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :118037-118045
[5]   The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation [J].
Chicco, Davide ;
Warrens, Matthijs J. ;
Jurman, Giuseppe .
PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021,
[6]  
Deepesh M., 2012, NAT RESOUR RES, V21, P117, DOI [10.1007/s11053-011-9167-8, DOI 10.1007/S11053-011-9167-8]
[7]  
Dübel S, 2017, INFORMATICS-BASEL, V4, DOI 10.3390/informatics4010006
[8]   Importance of Parameter Uncertainty in the Modeling of Geological Variables [J].
Erten, Oktay ;
Deutsch, Clayton V. .
NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (04) :1529-1547
[9]   State-of-the-Art and Comparative Review of Adaptive Sampling Methods for Kriging [J].
Fuhg, Jan N. ;
Fau, Amelie ;
Nackenhorst, Udo .
ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2021, 28 (04) :2689-2747
[10]  
Gousie M.B, 2005, P 4 WORKSH DYN MULT