Usability of Community Seismic Network recordings for ground-motion modeling

被引:1
|
作者
Mohammed, Shako [1 ]
Shams, Rashid [2 ]
Nweke, Chukwuebuka C. [2 ]
Buckreis, Tristan E. [1 ]
Kohler, Monica D. [3 ]
Bozorgnia, Yousef [1 ]
Stewart, Jonathan P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Samueli Engn, 5731 Boelter Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Civil & Environ Engn, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] CALTECH, Pasadena, CA USA
关键词
Accelerometers; ground-motion networks; ambient vibrations; ground-motion models; record processing; LOS-ANGELES; NOISE;
D O I
10.1177/87552930241267749
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A source of ground-motion recordings in urban Los Angeles that has seen limited prior application is the Community Seismic Network (CSN), which uses low-cost, micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) sensors that are deployed at much higher densities than stations for other networks. We processed CSN data for the 29 earthquakes with M > 4 between July 2012 and January 2023 that produced CSN recordings, including selection of high- and low-pass corner frequencies (f(cHP) and f(cLP), respectively). Each record was classified as follows: (1) Broadband Record (BBR)-relatively broad usable frequency range from f(cHP) < 0.5 to f(cLP) > 10 Hz; (2) Narrowband Record (NBR)-limited usable frequency range relative to those for BBR; and (3) Rejected Record (REJ)-noise-dominated. We compare recordings from proximate (within 3 km) CSN and non-CSN stations (screened to only include cases of similar surface geology and favorable CSN instrument housing). We find similar high- to medium-frequency ground motions (i.e. peak ground acceleration (PGA) and Sa for T < 5 s) from CSN BBR and non-CSN stations, whereas NBRs have lower amplitudes. We examine PGA distributions for BBR and REJ records and find them to be distinguished, on average across the network, at 0.005 g, whereas 0.0015 g was found to be the threshold between usable records (BBR and NBR) and pre-event noise. Recordings with amplitudes near or below these thresholds are generally noise-dominated, reflecting environmental and anthropogenic ground vibrations and instrument noise. We find nominally higher noise levels in areas of high-population density and lower noise levels by a factor of about 1.5 in low-population density areas. By applying the 0.0015 g threshold, limiting distances for the network-average site condition, based on the expected fifth-percentile ground-motion levels, are 89, 210, 280, and 370 km for M 5, 6, 7, and 8 events, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:2598 / 2622
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ground-motion characterization for the probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Turkey
    Sinan Akkar
    Özkan Kale
    Ahmet Yakut
    Ulubey Çeken
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 16 : 3439 - 3463
  • [22] Spatial Distribution of Ground-Motion Variability in Broadband Ground-Motion Simulations
    Iwaki, Asako
    Morikawa, Nobuyuki
    Maeda, Takahiro
    Fujiwara, Hiroyuki
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2017, 107 (06) : 2963 - 2979
  • [23] Modeling The 2023 New Zealand Ground-Motion Database
    Hutchinson, Jesse A.
    Zhu, Chuanbin
    Bradley, Brendon A.
    Lee, Robin L.
    Wotherspoon, Liam M.
    Dupuis, Michael
    Schill, Claudio
    Motha, Jason
    Manea, Elena F.
    Kaiser, Anna E.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2024, 114 (01) : 291 - 310
  • [24] Modeling Critical Ground-Motion Sequences for Inelastic Structures
    Moustafa, Abbas
    Takewaki, Izuru
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 13 (04) : 665 - 679
  • [25] Nonlinear site response from the strong ground-motion recordings in western China
    Rong, Mianshui
    Wang, Zhenming
    Woolery, Edward W.
    Lyu, Yuejun
    Li, Xiaojun
    Li, Shanyou
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 82 : 99 - 110
  • [26] A Short Note on Ground-motion Recordings from the M 7.9 Wenchuan, China, Earthquake and Ground-motion Prediction Equations in the Central and Eastern United States
    Wang, Zhenming
    Lu, Ming
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 82 (05) : 731 - 734
  • [27] Quantification of site effects in the Amatrice area (Central Italy): Insights from ground-motion recordings of the 2016–2017 seismic sequence
    Felicetta, Chiara
    Mascandola, Claudia
    Spallarossa, Daniele
    Pacor, Francesca
    Hailemikael, Salomon
    Di Giulio, Giuseppe
    Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 142
  • [28] A recurrent-neural-network-based generalized ground-motion model for the Chilean subduction seismic environment
    Fayaz, Jawad
    Medalla, Miguel
    Torres-Rodas, Pablo
    Galasso, Carmine
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2023, 100
  • [29] Ranking of several ground-motion models for seismic hazard analysis in Iran
    Ghasemi, H.
    Zare, M.
    Fukushima, Y.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2008, 5 (03) : 301 - 310
  • [30] ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF NEW PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC GROUND-MOTION MAPS OF CANADA
    HEIDEBRECHT, AC
    BASHAM, PW
    RAINER, JH
    BERRY, MJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1983, 10 (04) : 670 - 680