Usability of Community Seismic Network recordings for ground-motion modeling

被引:1
|
作者
Mohammed, Shako [1 ]
Shams, Rashid [2 ]
Nweke, Chukwuebuka C. [2 ]
Buckreis, Tristan E. [1 ]
Kohler, Monica D. [3 ]
Bozorgnia, Yousef [1 ]
Stewart, Jonathan P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Samueli Engn, 5731 Boelter Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Civil & Environ Engn, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] CALTECH, Pasadena, CA USA
关键词
Accelerometers; ground-motion networks; ambient vibrations; ground-motion models; record processing; LOS-ANGELES; NOISE;
D O I
10.1177/87552930241267749
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A source of ground-motion recordings in urban Los Angeles that has seen limited prior application is the Community Seismic Network (CSN), which uses low-cost, micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) sensors that are deployed at much higher densities than stations for other networks. We processed CSN data for the 29 earthquakes with M > 4 between July 2012 and January 2023 that produced CSN recordings, including selection of high- and low-pass corner frequencies (f(cHP) and f(cLP), respectively). Each record was classified as follows: (1) Broadband Record (BBR)-relatively broad usable frequency range from f(cHP) < 0.5 to f(cLP) > 10 Hz; (2) Narrowband Record (NBR)-limited usable frequency range relative to those for BBR; and (3) Rejected Record (REJ)-noise-dominated. We compare recordings from proximate (within 3 km) CSN and non-CSN stations (screened to only include cases of similar surface geology and favorable CSN instrument housing). We find similar high- to medium-frequency ground motions (i.e. peak ground acceleration (PGA) and Sa for T < 5 s) from CSN BBR and non-CSN stations, whereas NBRs have lower amplitudes. We examine PGA distributions for BBR and REJ records and find them to be distinguished, on average across the network, at 0.005 g, whereas 0.0015 g was found to be the threshold between usable records (BBR and NBR) and pre-event noise. Recordings with amplitudes near or below these thresholds are generally noise-dominated, reflecting environmental and anthropogenic ground vibrations and instrument noise. We find nominally higher noise levels in areas of high-population density and lower noise levels by a factor of about 1.5 in low-population density areas. By applying the 0.0015 g threshold, limiting distances for the network-average site condition, based on the expected fifth-percentile ground-motion levels, are 89, 210, 280, and 370 km for M 5, 6, 7, and 8 events, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:2598 / 2622
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ground-motion networks in the Groningen field: usability and consistency of surface recordings
    Michail Ntinalexis
    Julian J. Bommer
    Elmer Ruigrok
    Benjamin Edwards
    Rui Pinho
    Bernard Dost
    António A. Correia
    Jeroen Uilenreef
    Peter J. Stafford
    Jan van Elk
    Journal of Seismology, 2019, 23 : 1233 - 1253
  • [2] Ground-motion networks in the Groningen field: usability and consistency of surface recordings
    Ntinalexis, Michail
    Bommer, Julian J.
    Ruigrok, Elmer
    Edwards, Benjamin
    Pinho, Rui
    Dost, Bernard
    Correia, Antonio A.
    Uilenreef, Jeroen
    Stafford, Peter J.
    van Elk, Jan
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2019, 23 (06) : 1233 - 1253
  • [3] Accounting for ground-motion uncertainty in empirical seismic fragility modeling
    Bodenmann, Lukas
    Baker, Jack W.
    Stojadinovic, Bozidar
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2024, 40 (04) : 2456 - 2474
  • [4] Evaluation of Ground-Motion Models for USGS Seismic Hazard Models Using Near-Source Instrumental Ground-Motion Recordings of the Ridgecrest, California, Earthquake Sequence
    McNamara, Daniel E.
    Wolin, Emily L. G.
    Moschetti, Morgan P.
    Thompson, Eric M.
    Powers, Peter M.
    Shumway, Alison M.
    Petersen, Mark D.
    Wilson, David C.
    Benz, Harley M.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 110 (04) : 1517 - 1529
  • [5] Large-amplitude ground-motion recordings and their interpretations
    Strasser, Fleur O.
    Bommer, Julian J.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2009, 29 (10) : 1305 - 1329
  • [6] SEISMIC GROUND-MOTION COMPUTATIONS AT LOW PROBABILITIES
    MILNE, WG
    WEICHERT, DH
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1986, 13 (06) : 595 - 599
  • [7] Seismic ground-motion criteria for bridge design
    Penzien, Joseph
    Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on New Dimensions in Bridges: Flyovers, Overpasses & Elevated Structures, 2006, : 53 - 66
  • [8] Reference database for seismic ground-motion in Europe (RESORCE)
    S. Akkar
    M. A. Sandıkkaya
    M. Şenyurt
    A. Azari Sisi
    B. Ö. Ay
    P. Traversa
    J. Douglas
    F. Cotton
    L. Luzi
    B. Hernandez
    S. Godey
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2014, 12 : 311 - 339
  • [9] SEISMIC GROUND-MOTION COMPUTATIONS AT LOW PROBABILITIES - REPLY
    WEICHERT, DH
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1987, 14 (05) : 715 - 716
  • [10] Modeling damage accumulation during ground-motion sequences for portfolio seismic loss assessments
    Iacoletti, Salvatore
    Cremen, Gemma
    Galasso, Carmine
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2023, 168