Promoting the adoption of digital technology: Strategic policy insights from a network effects model

被引:0
|
作者
Vu, Khuong [1 ]
Rohman, Ibrahim Kholilul [2 ,3 ]
Bohlin, Erik [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Univ Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
[3] Indonesia Financial Grp Progress, Jakarta, Indonesia
[4] Chalmers Univ Technol, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Digital adoption; Network effects; Stable and unstable equilibriums; Critical mass; Promotion policy; USER ACCEPTANCE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; COMPETITION; ICT;
D O I
10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102852
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This paper examines a dynamic model of digital adoption by firms, incorporating network effects and highlighting the crucial role of government intervention to avoid a low stable equilibrium. The paper presents a strategic policy framework for promoting digital adoption effectively, offering three key insights for policy efforts targeting SMEs. First, there is a risk of ending up at a stable low equilibrium rate of digital adoption despite an initial surge in interest. Sustaining momentum beyond initial promotion efforts is essential. Second, it is critical to make a significant push when the digital adoption rate is approaching critical mass. This tipping point enables continuous, self-sustaining expansion. Third, understanding technology adoption cycles and allocating resources effectively is crucial. Once the adoption rate passes the critical threshold, further adoption occurs without promotional interventions. Resources should then be reallocated to foster the adoption of new technologies or applications, ensuring optimal use of limited resources to drive ongoing innovation and progress. The study also reveals that countries with a larger population of SMEs, due to either a large population or strong entrepreneurial environment, may find it relatively easier to promote digital adoption in this sector.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Technology adoption in markets with network effects: Theory and experimental evidence
    Keser, Claudia
    Suleymanova, Irina
    Wey, Christian
    INFORMATION ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2012, 24 (3-4) : 262 - 276
  • [2] Digital healthcare technology adoption by elderly people: A capability approach model
    Nikou, Shahrokh
    Agahari, Wirawan
    Keijzer-Broers, Wally
    de Reuver, Mark
    TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2020, 53
  • [3] Local Network Effects in the Adoption of a Digital Platform
    Kim, Jin-Hyuk
    Newberry, Peter
    Wagman, Liad
    Wolff, Ran
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 70 (03) : 493 - 524
  • [4] Strategic technology commercialization in the supply chain under network effects
    Wang, Wei
    Lyu, Gaoyan
    Cui, Wei
    Li, Yongjian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2021, 231
  • [5] Adoption of information technology under network effects
    Lee, Deishin
    Mendelson, Haim
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2007, 18 (04) : 395 - 413
  • [6] Network effects and the adoption of new technology: Evidence from the US telecommunications industry
    Majumdar, SK
    Venkataraman, S
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1998, 19 (11) : 1045 - 1062
  • [7] Policy Implications for Promoting the Adoption of Cogeneration Systems in the Hotel Industry: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Mode
    Man, Siu Shing
    Lee, Wilson Ka Ho
    Wong, Ka Po
    Chan, Alan Hoi Shou
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (08)
  • [8] Effects of managers' environmental consciousness and digital expertise on their technology adoption intentions
    Nakandala, Dilupa
    Yang, Richard
    Elias, Arun
    Fanousse, Rola
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 474
  • [9] Strategic Intellectual Property Sharing: Competition on an Open Technology Platform Under Network Effects
    Niculescu, Marius F.
    Wu, D. J.
    Xu, Lizhen
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (02) : 498 - 519
  • [10] Expectations, network effects and timing of technology adoption: some empirical evidence from a sample of SMEs in Italy
    Corrocher, Nicoletta
    Fontana, Roberto
    SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2008, 31 (04) : 425 - 441