Numerical and experimental investigation of process parameters optimization in hammer forging for minimizing risk of crack

被引:1
作者
Kitayama, Satoshi [1 ]
Sugita, Reo [2 ]
Kondo, Shuhei [3 ]
Miyoshi, Koji [3 ]
Aono, Eri [3 ]
Amano, Masaharu [3 ]
机构
[1] Kanazawa Univ, Adv Mfg Technol Inst, Kakuma Machi, Kanazawa 9201192, Japan
[2] Grad Sch Nat Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Nat Sci & Technol, Kakuma Machi, Kanazawa 9201192, Japan
[3] Komatsu Ltd, 3-1-1 Ueno, Hirakata, Osaka 5731011, Japan
关键词
Plastic working; Hammer forging; Design optimization; Multi-objective optimization; Numerical simulation; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; NEURAL-NETWORK; FOUNDATION; FEM; 3D;
D O I
10.1299/jamdsm.2024jamdsm0087
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Hammer forging is a traditional manufacturing technology to produce high stiffness product and is widely used in heavy industries. In the hammer forging, the product is produced through several blows. Unlike forging using mechanical press, the product is produced by the energy in the hammer forging, and consequently the energy distribution in blows plays a crucial role for producing highly accurate product. Conventionally, the energy distribution is determined by the trial-and-error method. This paper proposes a methodology to determine the optimal energy distribution using numerical simulation and design optimization technique. It is important to minimize the total energy for energy saving and the risk of crack for product quality. To produce the highly accurate product, underfill should be avoided, which is handled as the design constraint. Therefore, multi-objective design optimization is performed to minimize the total energy and the risk of crack without underfill. The numerical simulation is so intensive that sequential approximate optimization that response surface is repeatedly constructed and optimized is adopted to identify the pareto-frontier between the total energy and the risk of crack. It is clarified through the numerical result that the proposed approach can determine the energy at each blow effectively. The experiment is also conducted to examine the validity of the proposed approach.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]  
Miettinen Kaisa., 1988, Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-5563-6
[22]   Multiobjective Optimization of the Heating Process for Forging Automotive Crankshaft [J].
Park, Hong-Seok ;
Xuan-Phuong Dang .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2015, 137 (03)
[23]   Optimum pre-form dies in two-stage forging [J].
Poursina, M. ;
Parvizian, J. ;
Antonio, C. A. C. .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 174 (1-3) :325-333
[24]  
Santner TJ, 2018, SPRINGER SER STAT, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8847-1
[25]   Evolutionary forging preform design optimization using strain-based criterion [J].
Shao, Yong ;
Lu, Bin ;
Ou, Hengan ;
Ren, Facai ;
Chen, Jun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 71 (1-4) :69-80
[26]   Preform tool shape optimization and redesign based on neural network response surface methodology [J].
Tang, Yu-Cheng ;
Zhou, Xiong-Hui ;
Chen, Jun .
FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 2008, 44 (08) :462-471
[27]   3D preform shape optimization in forging using reduced basis techniques [J].
Thiyagarajan, N ;
Grandhi, RV .
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 37 (08) :797-811
[28]   Design optimization of low impact transmission foundation for forging hammers [J].
Wang, GQ ;
Dong, ZM .
ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 2006, 23 (1-2) :166-186
[29]   Contact stress and temperature during air-stamp hammer upsetting of a circular cylinder [J].
Yoneyama, Takeshi ;
Miyoshi, Koji ;
Tate, Tomoki .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2018, 32 :791-801
[30]   Multi-objective optimization method of precision forging process parameters to control the forming quality [J].
Zhu, Fayuan ;
Wang, Zhaohui ;
Lv, Mi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 83 (9-12) :1763-1771