Which electric vehicle charging station to upgrade? Biased judgments based on differences in station efficiency

被引:0
作者
Svenson, Ola [1 ,2 ]
Salo, Ilkka [3 ]
Gimeno, Ines Duce [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Dept Psychol, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Oregon Res Inst, Decis Res, Springfield, OR 97477 USA
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Psychol, Lund, Sweden
[4] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Psychol, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Electric vehicles; Charging stations; Biased efficiency measures; Decision making; TIME-SAVING BIAS; HEURISTICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.trf.2024.10.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
One way of controlling global warming is to substitute fuel driven cars with electric cars. Electric vehicles need to be charged. For maximal efficiency the charging times should be as short as possible. In the US charging stations are classified as Level 1 charging 5-10 miles/h, Level 2 25 miles/h and Fast DCFC stations 150-1000 miles/h. We asked participants to select one of two upgrades of charging stations that would save most charging time for a vehicle. The alternatives were upgrading L1 (5miles/h) to L2 (25 miles/h) or L2 (25miles/h) to Fast (250 miles/h). In all, 86% of the participants wanted to upgrade to a Fast station, which objectively saves less time than L1 to L2. The second study replicated the first study and 91% of the participants wanted to upgrade to the Fast (250) station. The third study offered alternatives with smaller objective efficiency differences than the earlier studies: upgrading L2 (30) to Fast (150) and Fast (150) to Fast (600) and 68% of the participants preferred the second incorrect alternative. Verbal justifications showed that many participants seemed to assume that differences in charging time are proportional to charging time saved. The results have practical implications and illustrate the difficulty to process reciprocal variables leading to incorrect decisions. Finally, we suggest two strategies for counteracting biased intuitive decision making when charging efficiencies are compared.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 673
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Fast Facts on Transportation Greenhouse Gas Emissions
[2]  
EPA, 2023, Plug in Electric Vehicle Charging: The Basics
[3]  
Eriksson G, 2013, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V8, P492
[4]  
Eriksson K, 2016, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V11, P205
[5]  
Graham J., 2024, SAE J. STEEP, V5, P151, DOI [10.4271/13-05-02-0011, DOI 10.4271/13-05-02-0011]
[6]  
Indeed, 2023, Over the road truck driver salary in United States
[7]   Sizing of electric vehicle charging stations with smart charging capabilities and quality of service requirements [J].
Khaksari, Alireza ;
Tsaousoglou, Georgios ;
Makris, Prodromos ;
Steriotis, Konstantinos ;
Efthymiopoulos, Nikolaos ;
Varvarigos, Emmanouel .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 70 (70)
[8]   The state of play in electric vehicle charging services - A review of infrastructure provision, players, and policies [J].
LaMonaca, Sarah ;
Ryan, Lisa .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 154
[9]   Economics - The MPG illusion [J].
Larrick, Richard P. ;
Soll, Jack B. .
SCIENCE, 2008, 320 (5883) :1593-1594
[10]   Too much or not enough? Planning electric vehicle charging infrastructure: A review of modeling options [J].
Metais, M. O. ;
Jouini, O. ;
Perez, Y. ;
Berrada, J. ;
Suomalainen, E. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 153