Optimal scheduling strategies for electrochemical energy storage power stations in the electricity spot market

被引：0

作者：

Li, Yuanyuan ^{[1
]}

Zhang, Shuyan ^{[1
]}

Yang, Luye ^{[2
]}

Gong, Qihang ^{[2
]}

Li, Xiaojing ^{[2
]}

Fan, Biwu ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Beijing Key Laboratory of Research and System Evaluation of Power, China Electric Power Research Institute, Power Automation Department, Beijing

[2] PKU-Changsha Institute for Computing and Digital Economy, Changsha

来源：

Frontiers in Energy Research | 2024年 / 12卷

关键词：

economic end of life; electricity spot market; electrochemical energy storage; energy arbitrage; profit model;

D O I：

10.3389/fenrg.2024.1469594

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Introduction: This paper constructs a revenue model for an independent electrochemical energy storage (EES) power station with the aim of analyzing its full life-cycle economic benefits under the electricity spot market. Methods: The model integrates the marginal degradation cost (MDC), energy arbitrage, ancillary services, and annual operation and maintenance (O&M) costs to calculate the net profits of the EES power station. Using an iterative optimization approach, we determine the optimal MDC and analyze the economic end of life (EOL) for different types of EES power stations. Results: By examining real-world examples from the California energy market, we find that the full life-cycle benefits of an EES power station peak when its MDC is optimal, at $45/MWh-throughput. Under these conditions, the economic and physical EOL of commercial/industrial EES power station is 9 years, while the economic EOL of residential-grade EES power station is 8 years, which is shorter than their physical EOL of 9 years. Discussion: The study further indicates that the economic life of an EES power station is influenced by multiple factors, and operators need to determine the optimal economic EOL to maximize revenue based on battery degradation characteristics, market conditions and operational strategy. Copyright © 2024 Li, Zhang, Yang, Gong, Li and Fan.

引用

共 21 条

[1] Chen Q., Fang X., Guo H., He G., Zhang D., Xia Q., Participation mechanism of energy storage in electricity market: status quo and prospect, Automation Electr. Power Syst, 45, 16, pp. 14-28, (2021)
[2] Chen X., Yang Y., Wang J., Song J., He G., Battery valuation and management for battery swapping station, Energy, 279, (2023)
[3] Cui H., Song K., Dou W., Nan Z., Wang Z., Zhang N., Bidding strategy of a flexible CHP plant for participating in the day-ahead energy and downregulation service market, IEEE Access, 9, pp. 149647-149656, (2021)
[4] Ecker M., Nieto N., Kaebitz S., Schmalstieg J., Blanke H., Warnecke A., Et al., Calendar and cycle life study of Li(NiMnCo)O<sub>2</sub>-based 18650 lithium-ion batteries, J. Power Sources, 248, pp. 839-851, (2014)
[5] Fares R., Webber M.E., What are the tradeoffs between battery energy storage cycle life and calendar life in the energy arbitrage application?, J. Energy Storage, 16, pp. 37-45, (2018)
[6] He G., Ciez R., Moutis P., Kar S., Whitacre J.F., The economic end of life of electrochemical energy storage, Appl. Energy, 273, (2020)
[7] He X., Lou S., Wu Y., Liang Y., Chen X., Two-stage market bidding and scheduling strategy of integrated wind power and energy, Automation Electr. Power Syst, 46, 4, pp. 47-55, (2022)
[8] Hesse H., Kumtepeli V., Schimpe M., Reniers J., Howey D., Tripathi A., Et al., Ageing and efficiency aware battery dispatch for arbitrage markets using mixed integer linear programming, Energies, 12, 9, (2019)
[9] Hledik R., Chang J., Lueken R., Pfeifenberger J., Pedtke J.I., Vollen J., The economic potential for energy storage in Nevada, (2018)
[10] Keil P., Schuster S.F., Wilhelm J., Travi J., Hauser A., Karl R.C., Et al., Calendar aging of lithium-ion batteries i. impact of the graphite anode on capacity fade, J. Electrochem Soc, 163, pp. 1872-1880, (2016)

← 1 2 3 →