The energy-environmental efficiency of the existing building stock through morphological-constructive solutions: The case study of a single-family building in sicily.

被引：0

作者：

Blundo F. ^{[1
]}

Foti F. ^{[1
]}

Leone F. ^{[1
]}

Nocera F. ^{[1
]}

Savoca L. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture DICAR, University of Catania, Viale Andrea Doria 6, Catania

来源：

Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal | 2021年 / 19卷

关键词：

Architecture; Comfort; Energy; Environment; Sustainability;

D O I：

10.24084/repqj19.255

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The protection of environmental resources, both energy and natural, is a current and urgent necessity for contemporary society. Since the building sector is responsible for a large part of energy and environmental consumption, the possibilities for savings in this sector are vast, starting with improving the quality of buildings. Therefore, the ecological orientation of the construction sector today represents a valid and necessary response to the sustainable development requirement to reduce the pressure on the environment in terms of impacts and consumption of resources. This is especially true if applied to the recovery and energy-environmental efficiency of the existing building stock. The aim of this study is to propose a methodology of "good practices" for the rehabilitation of non-historic buildings in terms of formal, functional, comfort and environmental quality, a methodology that combines the theme of architectural quality with that of environmental sustainability. In particular, the aim is to demonstrate how morphological-constructive solutions can be a valid response to the requirements of energy performance, environmental sustainability and occupant wellbeing. To this end, a case study of the renovation of a single-family building from the 1970s in the municipality of Ispica is reported, in which the proposed methodology is applied. © 2021, European Association for the Development of Renewable Energy, Environment and Power Quality (EA4EPQ). All rights reserved.

引用

页码：199 / 204

页数：5

共 8 条

[1] Abergel T., Dulac J., Hamilton I., Jordan M., Pradeep A., Dean P., Delmastro C., Motherway D., Slade M., Nass N., Otto M., Steurer N., Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction, (2019)
[2] Lavagna M., Lyfe cycle Assessment in edilizia. Progettare e costruire in una prospettiva di sostenibilità ambientale, (2008)
[3] Lavagna M., Baleani E., Gonzi E., Bessi A., Della Valle A., Ganassali S., Giorgi S., Decio M., Mazzetti M., Fagandini L., Marinelli S., Meneghelli A., Ojan M., Life Cycle Assessment in edilizia, (2019)
[4] Coccolo S., Kampf J., Scartezzini J. L., Pearlmutter D., Outdoor human comfort and thermal stress: A comprehensive review on models and standards, (2016)
[5] Leone F., Nigrelli F. C., Urban Changes to Control and Mitigate the Urban Heat Islands (UHI): Analysis in the Catania’s Territory, SpringerNature, (2021)
[6] Fernandez-Antolin M., del Rio J. M., Costanzo V., Nocera F., Gonzalez-Lezcano R., Passive design strategies for residential buildings in different spanish climate zones, Sustainability (Switzerland), 11, 18, (2019)
[7] Nocera F., Caponetto R., Giuffrida G., Detommaso M., Energetic retrofit strategies for traditional sicilian wine cellars: A case study, Energies, 13, 12, (2020)
[8] Trovato M. R., Nocera F., Giuffrida S., Life-cycle assessment and monetary measurements for the carbon footprint reduction of public buildings, Sustainability (Switzerland), 12, 8, (2020)

← 1 →