Multi-source information fusion for enhanced in-process quality monitoring of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

被引:0
|
作者
Shen, Tao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Bo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jianrui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xuan, Fuzhen [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech & Power Engn, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[2] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Addit Mfg & Intelligent Equipment Res Inst, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Collaborat Innovat Ctr High end Equipment, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Laser powder bed fusion; In-situ quality monitoring; Multi-source information fusion; Defect prediction; Melt-pool; Convolutional neural network; HIGH-ENTROPY ALLOYS; MELT-POOL; ACOUSTIC-EMISSION; POROSITY; SIZE; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2024.104575
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Defects such as lack of fusion, porosity, and keyhole generated during the laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing process pose a challenge, with the absence of effective prediction methods for the processinduced defects and as-printed quality. On-line monitoring becomes imperative to evaluate and enhance the LPBF in-process quality. Here, a multi-source information fusion strategy using a residual network (ResNet) is introduced for the in-process monitoring during the L-PBF. This approach integrates the melt-pool infrared (IR) images captured layer-by-layer, melt-track top-view photographs, melt-track numerical simulation diagrams, LPBF process parameters, and characteristic parameters of melt-pool cross-sectional morphology after solidification to enable quality monitoring of the L-PBF processing. To assess the defect severity, a quantitative defect evaluation method based on the defect-specific characteristics is proposed. This method facilitates the quantitative evaluation of defects by extracting pertinent defect indicators related to porosity and deformation. Additionally, two types of residual physical hybrid networks (ResPHN) and two types of residual physical fusion supervisory networks (ResPFSN) are introduced in this study. The performance of these four network models is meticulously compared and evaluated. The findings reveal that the most effective feature fusion monitoring model is the ResPFSN-type2, achieving an impressive accuracy of 99.4 % and displaying consistent performance across varying input image sizes and training data volumes. It underscores its potential for real-time process control applications. Furthermore, the interpretability of the model is scrutinized, with results indicating that the ResPFSN-type2 model adeptly identifies the contour texture and local features of the laser-induced melt pools.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] On thermal properties of metallic powder in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Zhang, Shanshan
    Lane, Brandon
    Whiting, Justin
    Chou, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2019, 47 : 382 - 392
  • [32] Powder-spreading dynamics and packing quality improvement for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Xiang, Zhaowei
    Zhang, Mingde
    Yan, Ran
    Yin, Qin
    Zhang, Kaifei
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 389 : 278 - 291
  • [33] Process Mapping and In-Process Monitoring of Porosity in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Using Layerwise Optical Imaging
    Imani, Farhad
    Gaikwad, Aniruddha
    Montazeri, Mohammad
    Rao, Prahalada
    Yang, Hui
    Reutzel, Edward
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2018, 140 (10):
  • [34] An Image Segmentation Framework for In-Situ Monitoring in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing
    Xie, Jason
    Jiang, Tianyu
    Chen, Xu
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (37): : 800 - 806
  • [35] Predicting laser powder bed fusion defects through in-process monitoring data and machine learning
    Feng, Shuo
    Chen, Zhuoer
    Bircher, Benjamin
    Ji, Ze
    Nyborg, Lars
    Bigot, Samuel
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2022, 222
  • [36] Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing of Maraging Steel: A Review
    Kizhakkinan, Umesh
    Seetharaman, Sankaranarayanan
    Raghavan, Nagarajan
    Rosen, David W.
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2023, 145 (11):
  • [37] Laser melting modes in metal powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Zhao, Cang
    Shi, Bo
    Chen, Shuailei
    Du, Dong
    Sun, Tao
    Simonds, Brian J.
    Fezzaa, Kamel
    Rollett, Anthony D.
    REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2022, 94 (04)
  • [38] Identifying Uncertainty in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Models
    Lopez, Felipe
    Witherell, Paul
    Lane, Brandon
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2016, 138 (11)
  • [39] Processing parameters in laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing
    Oliveira, J. P.
    LaLonde, A. D.
    Ma, J.
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2020, 193
  • [40] Pulsed laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of A356
    Chou, S. C.
    Trask, M.
    Danovitch, J.
    Wang, X. L.
    Choi, J. P.
    Brochu, M.
    MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION, 2018, 143 : 27 - 33