Multi-source information fusion for enhanced in-process quality monitoring of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

被引:0
|
作者
Shen, Tao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Bo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jianrui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xuan, Fuzhen [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech & Power Engn, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[2] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Addit Mfg & Intelligent Equipment Res Inst, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Collaborat Innovat Ctr High end Equipment, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Laser powder bed fusion; In-situ quality monitoring; Multi-source information fusion; Defect prediction; Melt-pool; Convolutional neural network; HIGH-ENTROPY ALLOYS; MELT-POOL; ACOUSTIC-EMISSION; POROSITY; SIZE; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2024.104575
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Defects such as lack of fusion, porosity, and keyhole generated during the laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing process pose a challenge, with the absence of effective prediction methods for the processinduced defects and as-printed quality. On-line monitoring becomes imperative to evaluate and enhance the LPBF in-process quality. Here, a multi-source information fusion strategy using a residual network (ResNet) is introduced for the in-process monitoring during the L-PBF. This approach integrates the melt-pool infrared (IR) images captured layer-by-layer, melt-track top-view photographs, melt-track numerical simulation diagrams, LPBF process parameters, and characteristic parameters of melt-pool cross-sectional morphology after solidification to enable quality monitoring of the L-PBF processing. To assess the defect severity, a quantitative defect evaluation method based on the defect-specific characteristics is proposed. This method facilitates the quantitative evaluation of defects by extracting pertinent defect indicators related to porosity and deformation. Additionally, two types of residual physical hybrid networks (ResPHN) and two types of residual physical fusion supervisory networks (ResPFSN) are introduced in this study. The performance of these four network models is meticulously compared and evaluated. The findings reveal that the most effective feature fusion monitoring model is the ResPFSN-type2, achieving an impressive accuracy of 99.4 % and displaying consistent performance across varying input image sizes and training data volumes. It underscores its potential for real-time process control applications. Furthermore, the interpretability of the model is scrutinized, with results indicating that the ResPFSN-type2 model adeptly identifies the contour texture and local features of the laser-induced melt pools.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] In-Process Monitoring of Material Cross-Contamination Defects in Laser Powder Bed Fusion
    Montazeri, Mohammad
    Yavari, Reza
    Rao, Prahalada
    Boulware, Paul
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2018, 140 (11):
  • [22] Metal additive manufacturing by laser-powder bed fusion:Guidelines for process optimisation
    Obeidi, Muhannad Ahmed
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 15
  • [23] A cybermanufacturing and AI framework for laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process
    Amini, Mohammadhossein
    Chang, Shing, I
    Rao, Prahalada
    MANUFACTURING LETTERS, 2019, 21 : 41 - 44
  • [24] APPLICATION OF DIGITAL TWINS TO LASER POWDER BED FUSION ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING PROCESS CONTROL
    Yeung, Ho
    Kim, Felix
    Donmez, Alkan
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 18TH INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, MSEC2023, VOL 1, 2023,
  • [25] Qualitative and quantitative characterization of powder bed quality in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing by multi-task learning
    Jiang, Hao
    Zhao, Zhibin
    Zhang, Zilong
    Zhang, Xingwu
    Wang, Chenxi
    Chen, Xuefeng
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2024, 36 (4) : 2695 - 2707
  • [26] In-process monitoring and direct simulation of Argon shielding gas and vapour dynamics to control laser-matter interaction in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Shinjo, Junji
    Kutsukake, Asuka
    Wakabayashi, Hideki
    Arakawa, Kazuto
    Ogawara, Akira
    Uchida, Hiroyuki
    Panwisawas, Chinnapat
    Reed, Roger C.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2024, 80
  • [27] A MULTI-MODAL DATA-DRIVEN DECISION FUSION METHOD FOR PROCESS MONITORING IN METAL POWDER BED FUSION ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
    Yang, Zhuo
    Kim, Jaehyuk
    Lu, Yan
    Yeung, Ho
    Lane, Brandon
    Jones, Albert
    Ndiaye, Yande
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2022 INTERNATIONAL ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING CONFERENCE, IAM2022, 2022,
  • [28] A multi-scale multi-physics modeling framework of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process
    Zhang J.
    Zhang Y.
    Lee W.H.
    Wu L.
    Choi H.-H.
    Jung Y.-G.
    Zhang, Jing (jz29@iupui.edu), 2018, Elsevier Ltd (73) : 151 - 157
  • [29] Linking process parameters with lack-of-fusion porosity for laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing
    Mojumder, Satyajit
    Gan, Zhengtao
    Li, Yangfan
    Al Amin, Abdullah
    Liu, Wing Kam
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2023, 68
  • [30] Microwave Reflectometry for Online Monitoring of Metal Powder Used in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing
    Ahmadi, Farzaneh
    Zoughi, Reza
    IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2025, 4