Multi-source information fusion for enhanced in-process quality monitoring of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

被引:0
作者
Shen, Tao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Bo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jianrui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xuan, Fuzhen [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech & Power Engn, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[2] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Addit Mfg & Intelligent Equipment Res Inst, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Collaborat Innovat Ctr High end Equipment, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Laser powder bed fusion; In-situ quality monitoring; Multi-source information fusion; Defect prediction; Melt-pool; Convolutional neural network; HIGH-ENTROPY ALLOYS; MELT-POOL; ACOUSTIC-EMISSION; POROSITY; SIZE; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2024.104575
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Defects such as lack of fusion, porosity, and keyhole generated during the laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing process pose a challenge, with the absence of effective prediction methods for the processinduced defects and as-printed quality. On-line monitoring becomes imperative to evaluate and enhance the LPBF in-process quality. Here, a multi-source information fusion strategy using a residual network (ResNet) is introduced for the in-process monitoring during the L-PBF. This approach integrates the melt-pool infrared (IR) images captured layer-by-layer, melt-track top-view photographs, melt-track numerical simulation diagrams, LPBF process parameters, and characteristic parameters of melt-pool cross-sectional morphology after solidification to enable quality monitoring of the L-PBF processing. To assess the defect severity, a quantitative defect evaluation method based on the defect-specific characteristics is proposed. This method facilitates the quantitative evaluation of defects by extracting pertinent defect indicators related to porosity and deformation. Additionally, two types of residual physical hybrid networks (ResPHN) and two types of residual physical fusion supervisory networks (ResPFSN) are introduced in this study. The performance of these four network models is meticulously compared and evaluated. The findings reveal that the most effective feature fusion monitoring model is the ResPFSN-type2, achieving an impressive accuracy of 99.4 % and displaying consistent performance across varying input image sizes and training data volumes. It underscores its potential for real-time process control applications. Furthermore, the interpretability of the model is scrutinized, with results indicating that the ResPFSN-type2 model adeptly identifies the contour texture and local features of the laser-induced melt pools.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Laser-aided additive manufacturing of high entropy alloys: Processes, properties, and emerging applications
    Arif, Zia Ullah
    Khalid, Muhammad Yasir
    Rehman, Ehtsham Ur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2022, 78 : 131 - 171
  • [2] Deformations modelling of metal additively manufactured parts and improved comparison of in-process monitoring and post-process X-ray computed tomography
    Bonato, Nicolo
    Zanini, Filippo
    Carmignato, Simone
    [J]. ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2023, 75
  • [3] Selective laser melting of near-α titanium alloy Ti-6Al-2Zr-1Mo-1V: Parameter optimization, heat treatment and mechanical performance
    Cai, Chao
    Wu, Xu
    Liu, Wan
    Zhu, Wei
    Chen, Hui
    Qiu, Jasper Chua Dong
    Sun, Chen-Nan
    Liu, Jie
    Wei, Qingsong
    Shi, Yusheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 57 (57): : 51 - 64
  • [4] Similarity analysis for thermal signature comparison in metal additive manufacturing
    Chandrasekar, Sujana
    Coble, Jamie B.
    List, Fred, III
    Carver, Keith
    Beauchamp, Serena
    Godfrey, Amy
    Paquit, Vincent
    Babu, Sudarsanam S.
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2022, 224
  • [5] A mesoscale study of micro-spallation of Cu through coarse-grained molecular dynamics modeling
    Chen, Pengyu
    Wang, Xinxin
    Wang, Pei
    He, An-Min
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 220
  • [6] Melt pool sensing and size analysis in laser powder-bed metal additive manufacturing
    Cheng, Bo
    Lydon, James
    Cooper, Kenneth
    Cole, Vernon
    Northrop, Paul
    Chou, Kevin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2018, 32 : 744 - 753
  • [7] Modeling spatial point processes in video-imaging via Ripley's K-function: an application to spatter analysis in additive manufacturing
    Colosimo, Bianca Maria
    Pagani, Luca
    Grasso, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2024, 35 (01) : 429 - 447
  • [8] Laser powder bed fusion of nickel alloy 625: Experimental investigations of effects of process parameters on melt pool size and shape with spatter analysis
    Criales, Luis E.
    Arisoy, Yigit M.
    Lane, Brandon
    Moylan, Shawn
    Donmez, Alkan
    Ozel, Tugrul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS & MANUFACTURE, 2017, 121 : 22 - 36
  • [9] Optimization and comparison of porosity rate measurement methods of Selective Laser Melted metallic parts
    de Terris, Thibaut
    Andreau, Olivier
    Peyre, Patrice
    Adamski, Frederic
    Koutiri, Imade
    Gorny, Cyril
    Dupuy, Corinne
    [J]. ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2019, 28 : 802 - 813
  • [10] Real-time nanoscale observation of deformation mechanisms in CrCoNi-based medium- to high-entropy alloys at cryogenic temperatures
    Ding, Qingqing
    Fu, Xiaoqian
    Chen, Dengke
    Bei, Hongbin
    Gludovatz, Bernd
    Li, Jixue
    Zhang, Ze
    George, Easo P.
    Yu, Qian
    Zhu, Ting
    Ritchie, Robert O.
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY, 2019, 25 : 21 - 27