Multi-source information fusion for enhanced in-process quality monitoring of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

被引:0
|
作者
Shen, Tao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Bo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jianrui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xuan, Fuzhen [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech & Power Engn, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[2] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Addit Mfg & Intelligent Equipment Res Inst, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Collaborat Innovat Ctr High end Equipment, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Laser powder bed fusion; In-situ quality monitoring; Multi-source information fusion; Defect prediction; Melt-pool; Convolutional neural network; HIGH-ENTROPY ALLOYS; MELT-POOL; ACOUSTIC-EMISSION; POROSITY; SIZE; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2024.104575
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Defects such as lack of fusion, porosity, and keyhole generated during the laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing process pose a challenge, with the absence of effective prediction methods for the processinduced defects and as-printed quality. On-line monitoring becomes imperative to evaluate and enhance the LPBF in-process quality. Here, a multi-source information fusion strategy using a residual network (ResNet) is introduced for the in-process monitoring during the L-PBF. This approach integrates the melt-pool infrared (IR) images captured layer-by-layer, melt-track top-view photographs, melt-track numerical simulation diagrams, LPBF process parameters, and characteristic parameters of melt-pool cross-sectional morphology after solidification to enable quality monitoring of the L-PBF processing. To assess the defect severity, a quantitative defect evaluation method based on the defect-specific characteristics is proposed. This method facilitates the quantitative evaluation of defects by extracting pertinent defect indicators related to porosity and deformation. Additionally, two types of residual physical hybrid networks (ResPHN) and two types of residual physical fusion supervisory networks (ResPFSN) are introduced in this study. The performance of these four network models is meticulously compared and evaluated. The findings reveal that the most effective feature fusion monitoring model is the ResPFSN-type2, achieving an impressive accuracy of 99.4 % and displaying consistent performance across varying input image sizes and training data volumes. It underscores its potential for real-time process control applications. Furthermore, the interpretability of the model is scrutinized, with results indicating that the ResPFSN-type2 model adeptly identifies the contour texture and local features of the laser-induced melt pools.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IN-PROCESS DATA INTEGRATION FOR LASER POWDER BED FUSION ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
    Perisic, Milica
    Lu, Yan
    Jones, Albert
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, IDETC-CIE2022, VOL 2, 2022,
  • [2] LAYERWISE IN-PROCESS QUALITY MONITORING IN LASER POWDER BED FUSION
    Imani, Farhad
    Gaikwad, Aniruddha
    Montazeri, Mohammad
    Rao, Prahalada
    Yang, Hui
    Reutzel, Edward
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 13TH INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 1, 2018,
  • [3] Multi phenomena melt pool sensor data fusion for enhanced process monitoring of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Gaikwad, Aniruddha
    Williams, Richard J.
    de Winton, Harry
    Bevans, Benjamin D.
    Smoqi, Ziyad
    Rao, Prahalada
    Hooper, Paul A.
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2022, 221
  • [4] Assessment of optical emission analysis for in-process monitoring of powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Dunbar, Alexander J.
    Nassar, Abdalla R.
    VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING, 2018, 13 (01) : 14 - 19
  • [5] Advanced Process Monitoring in Additive Manufacturing: In-process temperature field measurement for laser metal deposition and laser powder bed fusion processes
    Tyralla, Dieter
    Seefeld, Thomas
    PhotonicsViews, 2020, 17 (03) : 60 - 63
  • [6] Modelling process monitoring data in laser powder bed fusion: A pragmatic route to additive manufacturing quality assurance
    Carter, Luke N.
    Villapun, Victor M.
    Andrews, James
    Grandjean, Thomas R. B.
    Dardis, John
    Cox, Sophie C.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING LETTERS, 2024, 11
  • [7] Additive Manufacturing Process Simulation of Laser Powder Bed Fusion and Benchmarks
    Ghabbour, Mina S.
    Qu, Xueyong
    Rome, Jacob I.
    SAMPE JOURNAL, 2024, 60 (04) : 26 - 31
  • [8] Additive manufacturing of ceramics via the laser powder bed fusion process
    Ullah, Abid
    Shah, Mussadiq
    Ali, Zulfiqar
    Asami, Karim
    Rehman, Asif Ur
    Emmelmann, Claus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED CERAMIC TECHNOLOGY, 2025,
  • [9] Research Progress and Challenges in Process Intelligent Monitoring of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing
    Zhao Z.
    Wang C.
    Zhang X.
    Chen X.
    Li Y.
    Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59 (19): : 253 - 276
  • [10] Multi-Resolution SPH Simulation of a Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process
    Afrasiabi, Mohamadreza
    Luethi, Christof
    Bambach, Markus
    Wegener, Konrad
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (07):