Storage Quality Analysis and Shelf Life Prediction of the Prepared Dish of Soybean Protein Artificial Meat

被引:0
作者
Sun Y. [1 ]
Wang L. [1 ]
Zhou B. [1 ]
Zhu X. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tourism & Cuisine, College Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin
[2] College of Food Engineering, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin
关键词
plant-based protein meat; prepared dishes; shelf life; soy protein; storage quality;
D O I
10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023080254
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, the prepared dish Kung Pao Chicken with soy protein artificial meat (SPAM-KPC) was developed to satisfy the higher demand for nutritious healthy and diversified convence food, and the changes in storage quality of SPAM-KPC at different storage temperatures (4, 25 and 37 ℃) were compared. The shelf life prediction model of the SPAM-KPC was established based on the total number of bacteria as the key quality factor affecting the shelf life of the product. The results showed that the total colony count of SPAM-KPC samples stored at three temperatures for 15 days increased from 0.67 lg(CFU/g) to 2.73, 3.37 and 4.33 lg(CFU/g), respectively. While pH (from 6.22 to 5.88, 5.87, 5.69) and sensory scores (from 25.12 to 22.67, 19.52, 16.84) gradually decreased, as well as hardness and springiness decreased. The shelf life of SPAM-KPC products at three storage temperatures was 28, 20 and 17 days, respectively. According to the findings, low-temperature storage at 4 ℃ was the best storage temperature for SPAM-KPC products. This work could provide a theoretical reference for the application of plant-based protein meat in the field of prepared dishes processing. © The Author(s) 2024.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 307
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] ZHANG D Q, LIU H, SUN X X, Et al., Analysis of current situation and trends of industrial processing technology for prepared dishes[J], Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 22, 10, (2022)
  • [2] LI D M, ZHANG X D, BI J R, Et al., Inheritance and innovation of Chinese prepared dishes industry[J], Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 22, 10, (2022)
  • [3] ZHANG T Y, DOU W, ZHANG X, Et al., The development history and recent updates on soy protein-based meat alternatives[J], Trends in Food Science & Technology, 109, pp. 702-710, (2021)
  • [4] DAY L, CAKEBREAD J A, LOVEDAY S M., Food proteins from animals and plants:Differences in the nutritional and functional properties[J], Trends in Food Science & Technology, 119, (2022)
  • [5] SUN Y, WANG L, ZHU X Q, Et al., Research status and challenge on plant-based protein meat[J], Science and Technology of Food Industry, 44, 17, (2023)
  • [6] LI Z, REGENSTEIN J M, ZHOU L Y, Et al., Soy protein isolates:A review of their composition, aggregation, and gelation[J], Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 21, 2, (2022)
  • [7] WEBB D, LI Y, ALAVI S., Chemical and physicochemical features of common plant proteins and their extrudates for use in plant-based meat[J], Trends in Food Science & Technology, 131, (2022)
  • [8] LIU H D, ZHANG J C, CHEN Q L, Et al., Research status of nutritional quality of plant-based meat substitutes[J], Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 23, 8, (2023)
  • [9] WANG Z M, SHI Y, ZHOU K, Et al., Effects of different thermal temperatures on the shelf life and microbial diversity of Dezhou-braised chicken[J], Food Research International, 136, (2020)
  • [10] CAO Y, ZGANG S X, XU X Y, Et al., Quality analysis of stored corn pancake and establishment of shelf-life prediction model[J], Food Science, 42, 1, (2021)