Comparative Analysis of Fluorescent Characteristics of Different Provisional Restorative Materials for Improved Dental Esthetics

被引:1
作者
Aneksomboonpol, Pitchaya [1 ]
Klaisiri, Awiruth [2 ]
Katheng, Awutsadaporn [3 ]
Limchaikul, Katanyoo [1 ]
Intajak, Papichaya [1 ]
Kittikundecha, Nuttaphon [1 ]
Prawatvatchara, Wisarut [4 ]
机构
[1] Srinakharinwirot Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Conservat Dent & Prosthodont, Bangkok 10110, Thailand
[2] Thammasat Univ, Fac Dent, Div Restorat Dent, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
[3] Naresuan Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand
[4] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
关键词
provisional restorative materials; fluorescence; spectrophotometer; CIEDE2000; MARGINAL ACCURACY; CAD/CAM; RESIN; COMPOSITES; COLOR; TEETH;
D O I
10.3390/polym16223184
中图分类号
O63 [高分子化学(高聚物)];
学科分类号
070305 ; 080501 ; 081704 ;
摘要
At present, provisional restorative materials are widely used for both short- and long-term treatment purposes. In esthetic dentistry, for the simulation of natural teeth, fluorescence plays a crucial role in enhancing the elegant, vibrant, and life-like appearance of restorative teeth, making them more closely resemble natural teeth. To achieve ideal esthetic outcomes, restorative materials must replicate the characteristics of natural teeth to provide the most realistic appearance possible. Thus, this study aims to compare the color difference in fluorescence (triangle E-00) between a normal bovine tooth and eight provisional restorative materials under ultraviolet radiation. Eight provisional restorative materials were fabricated, for a total of 80 specimens (size 13.0 mm x 8.0 mm x 1.0 mm). A sound bovine tooth incisor was collected and used as a control for both enamel and dentine conditions. The color difference in fluorescence (triangle E-00) was assessed using a spectrophotometer. A one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05) were used to analyze the resulting data. The results revealed that the color difference in fluorescence (triangle E-00) between the normal bovine tooth and eight provisional restorative materials used in this study was higher than the 50% acceptability threshold, indicating a clear mismatch between the fluorescence of the materials and that of the normal bovine tooth. Unifast Trad had the lowest triangle E-00 among the provisional restorative materials, while Luxatemp Fluorescence had the highest color difference in fluorescence (triangle E-00). The color difference in fluorescence (triangle E-00) between Unifast Trad and Luxatemp Fluorescence is statistically significant. However, no significant difference was observed between Temporary CB, Vipi Block Trilux, and Protemp 4, or between Luxatemp Star and Luxatemp Fluorescence. It can thus be concluded that the triangle E-00 mostly differs among the different materials. Luxatemp Star and Luxatemp Fluorescence exhibited the highest triangle E-00 by a significant margin compared to the other groups.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[31]   Discrimination between composite resin and teeth using fluorescence properties [J].
Tani, K ;
Watari, F ;
Uo, M ;
Morita, M .
DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2003, 22 (04) :569-580
[32]   Rare earth oxide-containing fluorescent glass filler for composite resin [J].
Uo, M ;
Okamoto, M ;
Watari, F ;
Tani, K ;
Morita, M ;
Shintani, A .
DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2005, 24 (01) :49-52
[33]   LUMINESCENCE SPECTRA OF DENTAL PORCELAINS [J].
WOZNIAK, WT ;
MOORE, BK .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1978, 57 (11-1) :971-974
[34]   COMPARISON OF THE FLEXURAL STRENGTH AND MARGINAL ACCURACY OF TRADITIONAL AND CAD/CAM INTERIM MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER THERMAL CYCLING [J].
Yao, Jiajing ;
Li, Jing ;
Wang, Yuhua ;
Huang, Hui .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 112 (03) :649-657
[35]  
Yassen Ghaeth H, 2011, J Oral Sci, V53, P273
[36]   Differences in color, translucency and fluorescence between flowable and universal resin composites [J].
Yu, Bin ;
Lee, Yong-Keun .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2008, 36 (10) :840-846
[37]  
Zero D T, 1995, Adv Dent Res, V9, P214