A simulation-based techno-economic-safety-social-environmental decision-making framework for prioritizing plastic waste treatment processes

Chemical recycling technologies hold promising potential in converting mixed plastic waste into energy and chemicals. This study proposed a simulation-based quantitative life cycle sustainability assessment framework for the potential plastic waste valorization processes. Sustainability metrics including environment, economy, safety, society, and energy were quantified and comprehensively investigated. Based on the Bayesian best-worst weighting and vector-based ranking methods, the normalized and weighted life cycle sustainability scores were used to prioritize the best process. Gasification-based technology was found superior than incineration-based technology, especially in the economic, techno-energetic, and social aspects. However, incinerated-based process with direct CO2 emissions performed better in the environmental aspects compared with the process integrating with carbon capture and utilization unit. Additional environmental burdens were brought to the system when incorporating the carbon capture and methanol synthesis process. Increased system complexity might bring unexpected environmental burdens, and sometimes even outweighed the benefits. Various weights were assigned to the multi-criteria decision-making model, and the gasification-based process consistently ranked first across all scenarios.