Gait event detection accuracy: Effects of amputee gait pattern, terrain and algorithm

被引:0
|
作者
Munoz-Larrosa, Eugenia Soledad [1 ,2 ]
Riveras, Mauricio [1 ,2 ]
Oldfield, Matthew [3 ]
Shaheen, Aliah F. [3 ,4 ]
Schlotthauer, Gaston [1 ,5 ]
Catalfamo-Formento, Paola [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CONICET UNER, Inst Res & Dev Bioengn & Bioinformat BB, Ruta 11,Km 10, Oro Verde, Argentina
[2] Univ Nacl Entre Rios, Sch Engn, Lab Res Human Movement, RA-3101 Oro Verde, Argentina
[3] Univ Surrey, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Sch Mech Engn Sci, Guildford GU2 7TE, England
[4] Brunel Univ London, Dept Life Sci, Div Sport Hlth & Exercise Sci, London UB8 3PH, England
[5] Univ Nacl Entre Rios, Lab Senales & Dinam Lineales, RA-3101 Oro Verde, Argentina
关键词
Level Ground; Slope; Ramp; Initial Contact; Foot Off; CONTACT; WALKING; IDENTIFICATION; TREADMILL; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112384
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Several kinematic-based algorithms have shown accuracy for gait event detection in unimpaired and pathological gait. However, their validation in subjects with lower limb amputation while walking on different terrains is still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of three kinematic-based algorithms: Coordinate-Based Algorithm (CBA), Velocity-Based Algorithm (VBA) and High-Pass Filtered Algorithms (HPA) for detection of gait events in subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation walking on different terrains. Twelve subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation, using a hydraulic ankle prosthesis, walked at self-selected walking speed, on level ground and up and down a slope. Detection of Initial Contact (IC) and Foot Off (FO) by the three algorithms for intact and prosthetic limbs was compared with detection by force platforms using the True Error (TE) (time difference in detection). Mean TE found for over 100 events analysed per condition were smaller than 40 ms for both events in all conditions (approximately 6 % of stance phase). Significant interactions (p < 0.01) were found between terrain and algorithm, limb and algorithm, and also a main effect for the algorithm. Post-hoc analyses indicate that the algorithm, the limb and the terrain had an effect on the accuracy in detection. If an accuracy of 40 ms is acceptable for the particular application, then all three algorithms can be used for event detection in amputee gait. However, if accuracy in detection of events is crucial for the intended application, an evaluation of the algorithms in pathological gait walking on the terrain of interest is recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analysis of terrain effects on the interfacial force distribution at the hand and forearm during crutch gait
    Rogers, Emma
    Leineweber, Matthew J.
    Andrysek, Jan
    ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 28 (04) : 202 - 208
  • [42] Quantitative method for gait pattern detection based on fiber Bragg grating sensors
    Ding, Lei
    Tong, Xinglin
    Yu, Lie
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2017, 22 (03)
  • [43] Evaluation of the performance of accelerometer-based gait event detection algorithms in different real-world scenarios using the MAREA gait database
    Khandelwal, Siddhartha
    Wickstrom, Nicholas
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2017, 51 : 84 - 90
  • [44] Robust deep learning-based gait event detection across various pathologies
    Dumphart, Bernhard
    Slijepcevic, Djordje
    Zeppelzauer, Matthias
    Kranzl, Andreas
    Unglaube, Fabian
    Baca, Arnold
    Horsak, Brian
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (08):
  • [45] Gait Analysis in a Box: A System Based on Magnetometer-Free IMUs or Clusters of Optical Markers with Automatic Event Detection
    Marin, Javier
    Blanco, Teresa
    de la Torre, Juan
    Marin, Jose J.
    SENSORS, 2020, 20 (12) : 1 - 27
  • [46] Gait event detection based on inter-joint coordination using only angular information
    Miyake, Tamon
    Kobayashi, Yo
    Fujie, Masakatsu G.
    Sugano, Shigeki
    ADVANCED ROBOTICS, 2020, 34 (18) : 1190 - 1200
  • [47] Gait event detection using inertial measurement units in people with transfemoral amputation: a comparative study
    Simonetti, Emeline
    Villa, Coralie
    Bascou, Joseph
    Vannozzi, Giuseppe
    Bergamini, Elena
    Pillet, Helene
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2020, 58 (03) : 461 - 470
  • [48] Gait Event Detection Based on Fuzzy Logic Model by Using IMU Signals of Lower Limbs
    Liu, Yue
    Liu, Yali
    Song, Qiuzhi
    Wu, Dehao
    Jin, Dongnan
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2024, 24 (14) : 22685 - 22697
  • [49] Real-time gait event detection for transfemoral amputees during ramp ascending and descending
    Maqbool, H. F.
    Husman, M. A. B.
    Awad, M. I.
    Abouhossein, A.
    Dehghani-Sanij, A. A.
    2015 37TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2015, : 4785 - 4788
  • [50] Real-time gait event detection for normal subjects from lower trunk accelerations
    Gonzalez, Rafael C.
    Lopez, Antonio M.
    Rodriguez-Uria, Javier
    Alvarez, Diego
    Alvarez, Juan C.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2010, 31 (03) : 322 - 325