Gait event detection accuracy: Effects of amputee gait pattern, terrain and algorithm

被引:0
|
作者
Munoz-Larrosa, Eugenia Soledad [1 ,2 ]
Riveras, Mauricio [1 ,2 ]
Oldfield, Matthew [3 ]
Shaheen, Aliah F. [3 ,4 ]
Schlotthauer, Gaston [1 ,5 ]
Catalfamo-Formento, Paola [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CONICET UNER, Inst Res & Dev Bioengn & Bioinformat BB, Ruta 11,Km 10, Oro Verde, Argentina
[2] Univ Nacl Entre Rios, Sch Engn, Lab Res Human Movement, RA-3101 Oro Verde, Argentina
[3] Univ Surrey, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Sch Mech Engn Sci, Guildford GU2 7TE, England
[4] Brunel Univ London, Dept Life Sci, Div Sport Hlth & Exercise Sci, London UB8 3PH, England
[5] Univ Nacl Entre Rios, Lab Senales & Dinam Lineales, RA-3101 Oro Verde, Argentina
关键词
Level Ground; Slope; Ramp; Initial Contact; Foot Off; CONTACT; WALKING; IDENTIFICATION; TREADMILL; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112384
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Several kinematic-based algorithms have shown accuracy for gait event detection in unimpaired and pathological gait. However, their validation in subjects with lower limb amputation while walking on different terrains is still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of three kinematic-based algorithms: Coordinate-Based Algorithm (CBA), Velocity-Based Algorithm (VBA) and High-Pass Filtered Algorithms (HPA) for detection of gait events in subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation walking on different terrains. Twelve subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation, using a hydraulic ankle prosthesis, walked at self-selected walking speed, on level ground and up and down a slope. Detection of Initial Contact (IC) and Foot Off (FO) by the three algorithms for intact and prosthetic limbs was compared with detection by force platforms using the True Error (TE) (time difference in detection). Mean TE found for over 100 events analysed per condition were smaller than 40 ms for both events in all conditions (approximately 6 % of stance phase). Significant interactions (p < 0.01) were found between terrain and algorithm, limb and algorithm, and also a main effect for the algorithm. Post-hoc analyses indicate that the algorithm, the limb and the terrain had an effect on the accuracy in detection. If an accuracy of 40 ms is acceptable for the particular application, then all three algorithms can be used for event detection in amputee gait. However, if accuracy in detection of events is crucial for the intended application, an evaluation of the algorithms in pathological gait walking on the terrain of interest is recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gait event detection algorithm based on smart insoles
    Kim, JeongKyun
    Bae, Myung-Nam
    Lee, Kang Bok
    Hong, Sang Gi
    ETRI JOURNAL, 2020, 42 (01) : 46 - 53
  • [2] Accuracy of three methods in gait event detection during overground running
    Mo, Shiwei
    Chow, Daniel H. K.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2018, 59 : 93 - 98
  • [3] Automated event detection algorithms in pathological gait
    Bruening, Dustin A.
    Ridge, Sarah Trager
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2014, 39 (01) : 472 - 477
  • [4] An Adaptive Method for Gait Event Detection of Gait Rehabilitation Robots
    Ye, Jing
    Wu, Hongde
    Wu, Lishan
    Long, Jianjun
    Zhang, Yuling
    Chen, Gong
    Wang, Chunbao
    Luo, Xun
    Hou, Qinghua
    Xu, Yi
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROROBOTICS, 2020, 14
  • [5] Gait Event Detection during Stair Walking Using a Rate Gyroscope
    Catalfamo Formento, Paola
    Acevedo, Ruben
    Ghoussayni, Salim
    Ewins, David
    SENSORS, 2014, 14 (03): : 5470 - 5485
  • [6] Validation of gait event detection by centre of pressure during target stepping in healthy and paretic gait
    van der Veen, Susanne M.
    Hammerbeck, Ulrike
    Baker, Richard J.
    Hollands, Kristen L.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2018, 79 : 218 - 222
  • [7] Gait event detection in laboratory and real life settings: Accuracy of ankle and waist sensor based methods
    Storm, Fabio A.
    Buckley, Christopher J.
    Mazza, Claudia
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2016, 50 : 42 - 46
  • [8] An Algorithm for Accurate Marker-Based Gait Event Detection in Healthy and Pathological Populations During Complex Motor Tasks
    Bonci, Tecla
    Salis, Francesca
    Scott, Kirsty
    Alcock, Lisa
    Becker, Clemens
    Bertuletti, Stefano
    Buckley, Ellen
    Caruso, Marco
    Cereatti, Andrea
    Del Din, Silvia
    Gazit, Eran
    Hansen, Clint
    Hausdorff, Jeffrey M.
    Maetzler, Walter
    Palmerini, Luca
    Rochester, Lynn
    Schwickert, Lars
    Sharrack, Basil
    Vogiatzis, Ioannis
    Mazza, Claudia
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 10
  • [9] Gait Event Detection on Level Ground and Incline Walking Using a Rate Gyroscope
    Catalfamo, Paola
    Ghoussayni, Salim
    Ewins, David
    SENSORS, 2010, 10 (06) : 5683 - 5702
  • [10] Gait Abnormality Detection in Unilateral Trans-Tibial Amputee in Real-Time Gait Using Wearable Setup
    Rathore, Radheshyam
    Singh, Amit Kumar
    Chaudhary, Himanshu
    Kandan, Karthikeyan
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (12) : 12567 - 12573