Technology readiness level assessment of carbon capture and storage technologies

被引:21
作者
Bukar, Ahmed M. [1 ]
Asif, Muhammad [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Mech Engn, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Architectural Engn & Construct Management, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, IRC Sustainable Energy Syst, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Carbon capture; Carbon storage; Technology readiness level; Energy transition; Sustainable Development Goals; Decarbonisation; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MATURITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2024.114578
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The global energy sector has experienced significant expansion in recent years, driven by rising demand and technological advancements. This growth has led to both opportunities and challenges, including global warming and the need to offset global carbon emissions. A wide range of technological maturity characterizes the current state of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. To efficiently navigate and accelerate the implementation of these solutions, conducting an in-depth assessment of various CCS technologies is necessary. In the literature, maturity assessment-based study of CCS technologies exists only using expert surveys. This study aimed to conduct a technology readiness level (TRL) assessment of CCS technologies with the help of a multifaceted approach comprising a literature review, technology identification, data collection, TRL mapping, expert survey, and comparative analysis. To achieve this, 79 CCS projects from the literature were analyzed to identify growing trends in the CCS industry. The analysis shows that both pre-combustion and post-combustion capture are mature technologies achieving TRL 9, while oxy-fuel capture is ranked at TRL 7. Similarly, carbon storage technologies achieved high ranking, enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and storage in saline aquifers are fully commercial and ranked at TRL 9. Enhanced coal bed methane (ECBM) extraction is trailing at TRL 3 in the research phase. In addition, a total of 21 experts were surveyed, and their statements corroborate the conclusions of the literature review. The research concludes that post-combustion capture and EOR are the most popular CCS technologies, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Cost structure of a postcombustion CO2 capture system using CaO [J].
Abanades, J. Carlos ;
Grasa, G. ;
Alonso, M. ;
Rodriguez, N. ;
Anthony, E. J. ;
Romeo, L. M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (15) :5523-5527
[2]   Temperature increase and its effects on fish stress physiology in the context of global warming [J].
Alfonso, Sebastien ;
Gesto, Manuel ;
Sadoul, Bastien .
JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2021, 98 (06) :1496-1508
[3]  
Alptekin Gokhan O, 2022, Pilot testing of a highly efficient pre-combustion sorbent-based carbon capture system, DOI [10.2172/1906977, DOI 10.2172/1906977]
[4]  
Alshehri AJ, 2023, Uthmaniyah CO 2-EOR demonstration project
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Dynamics of energy, environment and Economy: a Sustainability perspective, Vfirst
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Uthmaniyah CO2 EOR demonstration project details
[7]  
Asif M., 2022, The 4Ds of Energy Transition: Decarbonization, Decentralization, Decreasing Use, and Digitalization, P414
[8]  
Asif M., 2022, Handbook of Energy and Environmental Security, P1
[9]   Review of CO2 storage efficiency in deep saline aquifers [J].
Bachu, Stefan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 40 :188-202
[10]   A Technology Development Matrix for Carbon Capture: Technology Status and R&D Gap Assessment [J].
Baker, Ryan ;
Alizadeh Sahraei, Ommolbanin ;
Dal-Cin, Mauro Mario ;
Bensebaa, Farid .
FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 10