It Takes Two to Negotiate: Modeling Social Exchange in Online Multiplayer Games

被引：0
作者：
Jaidka K. [1 ]
Ahuja H. [2 ]
Ng L.H.X. [3 ]
机构：
[1] NUS Centre for Trusted Internet & Community, National University of Singapore, 11 Computing Drive, Singapore
[2] Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Ropar
来源：
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction | 2024年 / 8卷 / CSCW1期
关键词：
Diplomacy; discourse; machine learning; natural language processing; negotiation;
D O I：
10.1145/3637362
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Online games are dynamic environments where players interact with each other, which offers a rich setting for understanding how players negotiate their way through the game to an ultimate victory. This work studies online player interactions during the turn-based strategy game, Diplomacy. We annotated a dataset1 of over 10,000 chat messages for different negotiation strategies and empirically examined their importance in predicting long- and short-term game outcomes. Although negotiation strategies can be predicted reasonably accurately through the linguistic modeling of the chat messages, more is needed for predicting short-term outcomes such as trustworthiness. On the other hand, they are essential in graph-aware reinforcement learning approaches to predict long-term outcomes, such as a player's success, based on their prior negotiation history. We close with a discussion of the implications and impact of our work. © 2024 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [61] Sugden R., Team reasoning and intentional cooperation for mutual benefit, Journal of Social Ontology, 1, 1, pp. 143-166, (2015)
  • [62] Thibaut J.W., Kelley H.H., The social psychology of groups, (2017)
  • [63] Toma C.L., Hancock J.T., Reading between the lines: linguistic cues to deception in online dating profiles, Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp. 5-8, (2010)
  • [64] Tomanek K., Wermter J., Hahn U., An approach to text corpus construction which cuts annotation costs and maintains reusability of annotated data, Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL), pp. 486-495, (2007)
  • [65] Van Swol L.M., Braun M.T., Communicating deception: Differences in language use, justifications, and questions for lies, omissions, and truths, Group Decision and Negotiation, 23, pp. 1343-1367, (2014)
  • [66] Vargheese J.P., Collinson M., Masthoff J., Exploring susceptibility measures to persuasion, International Conference on Persuasive Technology, pp. 16-29, (2020)
  • [67] Vella K., Koren C.J., Johnson D., The impact of agency and familiarity in cooperative multiplayer games, Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 423-434, (2017)
  • [68] Wang X., Shi W., Kim R., Oh Y., Yang S., Zhang J., Yu Z., Persuasion for Good: Towards a Personalized Persuasive Dialogue System for Social Good, Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 5635-5649, (2019)
  • [69] Wilkinson M.D., Dumontier M., Jsbrand Jan Aalbersberg I., Appleton G., Axton M., Baak A., Blomberg N., Boiten J.-W., da Silva Santos L.B., Bourne P.E., Et al., The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship, Scientific data, 3, 1, pp. 1-9, (2016)
  • [70] Wuertz J., Alharthi S.A., Hamilton W.A., Bateman S., Gutwin C., Tang A., Toups Z., Hammer J., A design framework for awareness cues in distributed multiplayer games, Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1-14, (2018)
12345678