Comparative life cycle assessment of carbon-free ammonia as fuel for power generation based on the perspective of supply chains

被引:3
|
作者
Lee, Ha Eun [1 ]
Ling, Jester Lih Jie [1 ]
Pae, Kook Pyo [2 ]
Solanki, Bhanupratap S. [1 ]
Park, Han Saem [1 ]
Ahn, Hyung Jun [3 ]
Seo, Hae Won [3 ]
Lee, See Hoon [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Dept Environm & Energy, 567 Baekje Daero, Jeonju, South Korea
[2] Inha Univ, Grad Sch, Program Circular Econ Environm Syst, 100 Inha ro, Incheon, South Korea
[3] POSCO HOLDINGS NEXT Hub, Hydrogen & Low Carbon R&D Labs, 67 Cheongam Ro, Pohang 37673, South Korea
[4] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Dept Mineral Resources & Energy Engn, 567 Baekje Daero, Jeonju, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Ammonia production; Environmental impact; Energy mix; Material production; Carbon capture and storage (CCS); EXERGY ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2024.133557
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, there has been a surge in ammonia demand due to growing interest in carbon-free fuel for decarbonization. Thus, it is crucial to identify the methods to fulfill the required demand, particularly for countries with resource scarcity or lacking well-established production infrastructure. The present study compares environmental impact analysis between domestic ammonia production and import ammonia for these countries by using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. In these ammonia supply paths, five different production ways were applied: gray (conventional Haber-Bosch process), blue (with carbon capture and storage), green (wind, solar, and nuclear powered water electrolysis with Haber-Bosch process). The assessment showed highest global warming potential (GWP) value at 2.64 ton CO2-eq/ton NH3 for imported gray while domestic nuclear-driven ammonia had the lowest value at 0.81 ton CO2-eq/ton NH3. In addition, contrary to expectations, the human and environment impact of green ammonias were all higher than gray and blue ammonia due to the production of raw materials. This means that environmental improvements of related production process are crucial in preparation for the coming new energy regime, which then lead to the production of environmentally friendly ammonia. Lastly, these results offer valuable guideline for future energy strategy planning.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparative study on the combination of life cycle assessment and ecological footprints: solar photovoltaic power generation vs. coal power generation in Ningxia
    Luo, Jinni
    Yang, Hexu
    Zhang, Liangxia
    Liu, He
    Wang, Yidan
    Hao, Chen
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2024, 12
  • [32] Comprehensive Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of Polygeneration Systems Based on Plasma Gasification and Combined Cycle Power Generation
    Xu, Wenwu
    Yang, Lili
    Fan, Xiaorui
    Cui, Peizhe
    Zhu, Zhaoyou
    Wang, Yinglong
    Zhang, Hongru
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2025, 13 (01): : 669 - 680
  • [33] A life cycle impact assessment indicator for ash management in coal-based power generation
    Hansen, Y
    Notten, PJ
    Petrie, G
    JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGY, 2002, 102 (05) : 299 - 306
  • [34] Environmental impact assessment of VOC emissions from biomass gasification power generation system based on life cycle analysis
    Sun, Yunqi
    Wang, Shuo
    Yang, Qing
    Li, Jianlan
    Wang, Liang
    Zhang, Shihong
    Yang, Haiping
    Chen, Hanping
    FUEL, 2023, 335
  • [35] Role of hydrogen tanks in the life cycle assessment of fuel cell-based auxiliary power units
    Agostini, Alessandro
    Belmonte, Nadia
    Masala, Alessio
    Hu, Jianjiang
    Rizzi, Paola
    Fichtner, Maximilian
    Moretto, Pietro
    Luetto, Carlo
    Sgroi, Mauro
    Baricco, Marcello
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 215 : 1 - 12
  • [36] A comparative prospective life cycle assessment of coal-fired power plants in the US with MEA/MOF-based carbon capture
    Tao, Yiran
    Brander, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 456
  • [37] A life cycle framework for comparative analysis of power generation technologies based on prioritized sustainable development goals
    Tourinho, Tiago C. O.
    Serra, Eduardo G.
    Araujo, Ofelia Q. F.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 326
  • [38] Life-cycle assessment of SNG and power generation: The role of implement of chemical looping combustion for carbon capture
    He, Yangdong
    Zhu, Lin
    Li, Luling
    Rao, Dong
    ENERGY, 2019, 172 : 777 - 786
  • [39] Comparative Industrial-Scale Life Cycle Assessment of Base Case and Heat Recovery Scenarios for Carbon Capture from Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plants Using Aqueous Ammonia
    Ang, Pancy
    Goh, Wayne
    Bu, Jie
    Cheng, Shuying
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2024, : 18335 - 18349
  • [40] Process-based life cycle CO2 assessment of an ammonia-based carbon capture and storage system
    Kim, Yoori
    Lim, Seong-Rin
    Jung, Kyung A.
    Park, Jong Moon
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 2019, 76 : 223 - 232