Comparative life cycle assessment of carbon-free ammonia as fuel for power generation based on the perspective of supply chains

被引:3
|
作者
Lee, Ha Eun [1 ]
Ling, Jester Lih Jie [1 ]
Pae, Kook Pyo [2 ]
Solanki, Bhanupratap S. [1 ]
Park, Han Saem [1 ]
Ahn, Hyung Jun [3 ]
Seo, Hae Won [3 ]
Lee, See Hoon [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Dept Environm & Energy, 567 Baekje Daero, Jeonju, South Korea
[2] Inha Univ, Grad Sch, Program Circular Econ Environm Syst, 100 Inha ro, Incheon, South Korea
[3] POSCO HOLDINGS NEXT Hub, Hydrogen & Low Carbon R&D Labs, 67 Cheongam Ro, Pohang 37673, South Korea
[4] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Dept Mineral Resources & Energy Engn, 567 Baekje Daero, Jeonju, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Ammonia production; Environmental impact; Energy mix; Material production; Carbon capture and storage (CCS); EXERGY ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2024.133557
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, there has been a surge in ammonia demand due to growing interest in carbon-free fuel for decarbonization. Thus, it is crucial to identify the methods to fulfill the required demand, particularly for countries with resource scarcity or lacking well-established production infrastructure. The present study compares environmental impact analysis between domestic ammonia production and import ammonia for these countries by using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. In these ammonia supply paths, five different production ways were applied: gray (conventional Haber-Bosch process), blue (with carbon capture and storage), green (wind, solar, and nuclear powered water electrolysis with Haber-Bosch process). The assessment showed highest global warming potential (GWP) value at 2.64 ton CO2-eq/ton NH3 for imported gray while domestic nuclear-driven ammonia had the lowest value at 0.81 ton CO2-eq/ton NH3. In addition, contrary to expectations, the human and environment impact of green ammonias were all higher than gray and blue ammonia due to the production of raw materials. This means that environmental improvements of related production process are crucial in preparation for the coming new energy regime, which then lead to the production of environmentally friendly ammonia. Lastly, these results offer valuable guideline for future energy strategy planning.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and storage in power generation and industry in Europe
    Volkart, Kathrin
    Bauer, Christian
    Boulet, Celine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2013, 16 : 91 - 106
  • [22] Exergoenvironmental evaluation for combined cycle power generation system based on life cycle assessment
    Wang G.-Z.
    Chen J.-H.
    Hong X.-L.
    Wang X.-R.
    Chen Q.-F.
    Sheng D.-R.
    Li W.
    Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Gongxue Ban)/Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2019, 53 (05): : 972 - 980
  • [23] Comparative life cycle greenhouse gas emission and cost assessment of hydrogen fuel and power for Singapore
    Lee, Yinjin
    Kok, Eugene
    Goh, Soo Lin
    Chen, Keying
    Ho, Eugene Hong Zhuang
    Leow, Yong Jie
    Tan, Daren Zong Loong
    Yeo, Zhiquan
    Khoo, Hsien Hui
    Nduagu, Experience I.
    Wu, Wenzhao
    Abubakar, Saifudin M.
    Low, Jonathan Sze Choong
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT-X, 2025, 26
  • [24] Comparative life cycle assessment of PBAT from fossil-based and second-generation generation bio-based feedstocks
    Luo, Chenkai
    Zhou, Ya
    Chen, Zhitong
    Bian, Xinchao
    Chen, Ning
    Li, Junjie
    Wu, Yufeng
    Yang, Zhifeng
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 954
  • [25] A comparative life cycle assessment of solar combined cooling, heating, and power systems based on RESHeat technology
    Pan, Ting
    Oclon, Pawel
    Cisek, Piotr
    Nowak-Oclon, Marzena
    Yildirim, Mehmet Ali
    Wang, Bohong
    Van Fan, Yee
    Varbanov, Petar Sabev
    Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 359
  • [26] Life cycle and cost assessment of mineral carbonation for carbon capture and storage in European power generation
    Giannoulakis, Stylianos
    Volkart, Kathrin
    Bauer, Christian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2014, 21 : 140 - 157
  • [27] Life cycle environmental impact comparison of solid oxide fuel cells fueled by natural gas, hydrogen, ammonia and methanol for combined heat and power generation
    Bicer, Yusuf
    Khalid, Farrukh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (05) : 3670 - 3685
  • [28] Environmental impact assessment of different power generation strategies in Oman: A comparative life-cycle analysis
    Al Rashdi, Zuhoor
    Barghash, Hind
    Al Habsi, Fahmi
    Okedu, Kenneth E.
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (18)
  • [29] Building an agent-based techno-economic assessment coupled with life cycle assessment of biomass to methanol supply chains
    Zhu, Liandong
    Heavey, Cathal
    Nugroho, Yohanes Kristianto
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 309
  • [30] Comparative life cycle assessment of alternating and direct current electric loads: The case study of a power supply unit
    Longo, Sonia
    Affranchi, Alberto
    Cellura, Maurizio
    Guarino, Francesco
    ENERGY, 2025, 322