Environmental and Economic Impacts of Hydroxyapatite Mineralized Wood: LCA and LCC Analysis

被引:0
作者
Sitar, Matic [1 ,2 ]
Kitek Kuzman, Manja [2 ]
Oblak, Leon [2 ]
Remic, Katarina [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Slovenian Natl Bldg & Civil Engn Inst, Dimiceva Ul 12, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Jamnikarjeva 101, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[3] Univ Maribor, Fac Mech Engn, Smetanova Ul 17, Maribor 2000, Slovenia
来源
FORESTS | 2024年 / 15卷 / 09期
关键词
environmental impacts; hydroxyapatite; life cycle assessment (LCA); life cycle cost analysis (LCC); wood mineralization; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.3390/f15091532
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Wood is considered a promising raw material for the circular bioeconomy and has the ability to store biogenic carbon, and this is one reason why we want to extend the service life of the wood. In order to consider the influence of durability in our study, we used two wood species with different lifespans. Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) belongs to the group of very sensitive wood species, as the durability of the untreated wood is estimated to be around 5 years; meanwhile, pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) belongs to the group of moderately resistant wood species, where the durability of the untreated wood is estimated to be up to 15 years. While toxic chemicals are often used for wood preservation, hydroxyapatite offers an environmentally friendly solution for wood mineralization. This study presents life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC) analyses comparing a novel hydroxyapatite (HAp) mineralization method with a service life of 50 years to a non-mineralized reference alternative. LCA was based on EN ISO 14040 and EN ISO 14044, while LCC was adapted from the European Commission's LCC tool for public procurement. The results of the LCA show that mineralized wood has a lower overall impact on the environment than surface-treated beech wood but a higher impact than surface-treated pine wood. Most impact categories were determined by electricity consumption with the exception of stratospheric ozone depletion, water consumption, and land use. Water consumption proved to be the category where the mineralization process was problematic due to water consumption during the leaching process. The LCC showed that mineralized wood is the most cost-effective solution for the exterior fa & ccedil;ade, as all costs, but especially investment costs, were lower. The differences in the LCA and LCC results are mainly due to the different lifetimes of the two alternatives. It can be concluded that if energy-intensive processes and chemicals are used in the production of the material, the extended lifetime must be sufficient to account for the additional impacts that occur during the production phase.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental impacts of French and Brazilian broiler chicken production scenarios: An LCA approach
    da Silva, Vamilson Prudencio
    van der Werf, Hayo M. G.
    Soares, Sebastiao Roberto
    Corson, Michael S.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 133 : 222 - 231
  • [42] Hybrid LCA model for assessing the embodied environmental impacts of buildings in South Korea
    Jang, Minho
    Hong, Taehoon
    Ji, Changyoon
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2015, 50 : 143 - 155
  • [43] Environmental impacts of dry anaerobic biorefineries in a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach
    Rossi, Elena
    Pasciucco, Francesco
    Iannelli, Renato
    Pecorini, Isabella
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 371
  • [44] LCA/LCC analysis of starting-lighting-ignition lead-acid battery in China
    Ma, Yongxi
    Yu, Shuao
    Wang, Juanli
    Yu, Wei
    PEERJ, 2018, 6
  • [45] Integration of BIM and LCA: Evaluating the environmental impacts of building materials at an early stage of designing a typical office building
    Najjar, Mohammad
    Figueiredo, Karoline
    Palumbo, Mariana
    Haddad, Assed
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2017, 14 : 115 - 126
  • [46] Environmental impacts of imported and locally grown fruits for the French market: a cradle-to-farm-gate LCA study
    Basset-Mens, Claudine
    Vanniere, Henri
    Grasselly, Dominique
    Heitz, Hadrien
    Braun, Angela
    Payen, Sandra
    Koch, Peter
    Biard, Yannick
    FRUITS, 2016, 71 (02) : 93 - 104
  • [47] An integrated environmental and cost assessment method based on LCA and LCC for automobile interior and exterior trim design scheme optimization
    Lei Zhang
    Wanfu Dong
    Zhifeng Jin
    Xinyu Li
    Yongqiang Ren
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25 : 633 - 645
  • [48] Environmental and economic impacts of photovoltaic integration in concentrated solar power plants
    Costa, D.
    De Regel, S.
    Espadas-Aldana, G.
    Laget, H.
    Kishore, R.
    Meuret, Y.
    Duerinckx, F.
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2024, 274
  • [49] Environmental impacts and techno-economic assessments of biobased products: A review
    Mousavi-Avval, Seyed Hashem
    Sahoo, Kamalakanta
    Nepal, Prakash
    Runge, Troy
    Bergman, Richard
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2023, 180
  • [50] Analysis of the socio-economic and environmental impacts of construction waste and management practices
    Tafesse, Shitaw
    Girma, Yidnekachew Esayas
    Dessalegn, Eliyas
    HELIYON, 2022, 8 (03)