Environmental and Economic Impacts of Hydroxyapatite Mineralized Wood: LCA and LCC Analysis

被引:0
作者
Sitar, Matic [1 ,2 ]
Kitek Kuzman, Manja [2 ]
Oblak, Leon [2 ]
Remic, Katarina [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Slovenian Natl Bldg & Civil Engn Inst, Dimiceva Ul 12, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Jamnikarjeva 101, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[3] Univ Maribor, Fac Mech Engn, Smetanova Ul 17, Maribor 2000, Slovenia
来源
FORESTS | 2024年 / 15卷 / 09期
关键词
environmental impacts; hydroxyapatite; life cycle assessment (LCA); life cycle cost analysis (LCC); wood mineralization; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.3390/f15091532
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Wood is considered a promising raw material for the circular bioeconomy and has the ability to store biogenic carbon, and this is one reason why we want to extend the service life of the wood. In order to consider the influence of durability in our study, we used two wood species with different lifespans. Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) belongs to the group of very sensitive wood species, as the durability of the untreated wood is estimated to be around 5 years; meanwhile, pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) belongs to the group of moderately resistant wood species, where the durability of the untreated wood is estimated to be up to 15 years. While toxic chemicals are often used for wood preservation, hydroxyapatite offers an environmentally friendly solution for wood mineralization. This study presents life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC) analyses comparing a novel hydroxyapatite (HAp) mineralization method with a service life of 50 years to a non-mineralized reference alternative. LCA was based on EN ISO 14040 and EN ISO 14044, while LCC was adapted from the European Commission's LCC tool for public procurement. The results of the LCA show that mineralized wood has a lower overall impact on the environment than surface-treated beech wood but a higher impact than surface-treated pine wood. Most impact categories were determined by electricity consumption with the exception of stratospheric ozone depletion, water consumption, and land use. Water consumption proved to be the category where the mineralization process was problematic due to water consumption during the leaching process. The LCC showed that mineralized wood is the most cost-effective solution for the exterior fa & ccedil;ade, as all costs, but especially investment costs, were lower. The differences in the LCA and LCC results are mainly due to the different lifetimes of the two alternatives. It can be concluded that if energy-intensive processes and chemicals are used in the production of the material, the extended lifetime must be sufficient to account for the additional impacts that occur during the production phase.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental Impacts of Rainwater Harvesting Systems in Urban Areas Applying Life Cycle Assessment-LCA
    da Silva, Mariana P.
    Gonzalez, Jorge
    da Costa, Bruno B. F.
    Garrido, Claudia
    Soares, Carlos A. P.
    Haddad, Assed N.
    ENG, 2023, 4 (02): : 1127 - 1143
  • [32] A Comparative Analysis of the Environmental Impacts of Wood-Aluminum Window Production in Two Life Cycle Assessment Software
    Seckar, Michal
    Schwarz, Marian
    Pochyba, Adam
    Polgar, Andras
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (21)
  • [33] Application of LCA Method for Assessment of Environmental Impacts of a Polylactide (PLA) Bottle Shaping
    Baldowska-Witos, Patrycja
    Kruszelnicka, Weronika
    Kasner, Robert
    Tomporowski, Andrzej
    Flizikowski, Jozef
    Klos, Zbigniew
    Piotrowska, Katarzyna
    Markowska, Katarzyna
    POLYMERS, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [34] Life-LCA: assessing the environmental impacts of a human being—challenges and perspectives
    Marcel Goermer
    Annekatrin Lehmann
    Matthias Finkbeiner
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25 : 141 - 156
  • [35] COMPARISON OF A WATERCOOLER AND OTHER ALTERNATIVES IN TERMS OF THEIR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS USING THE LCA METHOD
    Simon, Michal
    Blacky, Tomas
    Zoubek, Michal
    MM SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2023, 2023 : 6582 - 6593
  • [36] Incorporating environmental impacts and regulations in a holistic supply chains modeling: An LCA approach
    David Bojarski, Aaron
    Miguel Lainez, Jose
    Espuna, Antonio
    Puigjaner, Luis
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 33 (10) : 1747 - 1759
  • [37] Buildings environmental impacts' sensitivity related to LCA modelling choices of construction materials
    Haefliger, Ian-Frederic
    John, Viola
    Passer, Alexander
    Lasvaux, Sebastien
    Hoxha, Endrit
    Mendes Saade, Marcella Ruschi
    Habert, Guillaume
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 156 : 805 - 816
  • [38] Sustainable Steel Production: A Comprehensive LCA Approach for Reducing Environmental Costs and Impacts
    Aref Ahmadian Baghbadarani
    Khosro Ashrafi
    Abdolreza Karbassi
    Materials Circular Economy, 2025, 7 (1):
  • [39] Combining Process Modelling and LCA to Assess the Environmental Impacts of Wastewater Treatment Innovations
    Paulu, Ales
    Bartacek, Jan
    Seresova, Marketa
    Koci, Vladimir
    WATER, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [40] Comparative Analysis of Environmental Impacts between Dregs Disposal and Conventional Cement Production by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
    Fu, Kan
    Ren, Xiaoyu
    Lin, Jinquan
    Yue, Ping
    ENVIRONMENTAL BIOTECHNOLOGY AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING (2013), 2013, 777 : 461 - 466