Environmental and Economic Impacts of Hydroxyapatite Mineralized Wood: LCA and LCC Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Sitar, Matic [1 ,2 ]
Kitek Kuzman, Manja [2 ]
Oblak, Leon [2 ]
Remic, Katarina [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Slovenian Natl Bldg & Civil Engn Inst, Dimiceva Ul 12, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Jamnikarjeva 101, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[3] Univ Maribor, Fac Mech Engn, Smetanova Ul 17, Maribor 2000, Slovenia
来源
FORESTS | 2024年 / 15卷 / 09期
关键词
environmental impacts; hydroxyapatite; life cycle assessment (LCA); life cycle cost analysis (LCC); wood mineralization; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.3390/f15091532
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Wood is considered a promising raw material for the circular bioeconomy and has the ability to store biogenic carbon, and this is one reason why we want to extend the service life of the wood. In order to consider the influence of durability in our study, we used two wood species with different lifespans. Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) belongs to the group of very sensitive wood species, as the durability of the untreated wood is estimated to be around 5 years; meanwhile, pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) belongs to the group of moderately resistant wood species, where the durability of the untreated wood is estimated to be up to 15 years. While toxic chemicals are often used for wood preservation, hydroxyapatite offers an environmentally friendly solution for wood mineralization. This study presents life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC) analyses comparing a novel hydroxyapatite (HAp) mineralization method with a service life of 50 years to a non-mineralized reference alternative. LCA was based on EN ISO 14040 and EN ISO 14044, while LCC was adapted from the European Commission's LCC tool for public procurement. The results of the LCA show that mineralized wood has a lower overall impact on the environment than surface-treated beech wood but a higher impact than surface-treated pine wood. Most impact categories were determined by electricity consumption with the exception of stratospheric ozone depletion, water consumption, and land use. Water consumption proved to be the category where the mineralization process was problematic due to water consumption during the leaching process. The LCC showed that mineralized wood is the most cost-effective solution for the exterior fa & ccedil;ade, as all costs, but especially investment costs, were lower. The differences in the LCA and LCC results are mainly due to the different lifetimes of the two alternatives. It can be concluded that if energy-intensive processes and chemicals are used in the production of the material, the extended lifetime must be sufficient to account for the additional impacts that occur during the production phase.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental and economic impacts of e-waste recycling: A systematic review
    Lee, Junghwan
    Choi, Hyeseung
    Kim, Jinsoo
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2024, 494
  • [22] Assessing domestic environmental impacts through LCA using data from the scientific literature
    Spreafico, Christian
    Russo, Davide
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 266
  • [23] The path to zero impacts: environmental building declarations based on LCA
    Killpack, R. Keith
    Burgoyne, Daniel E.
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION: CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 86 : 231 - 238
  • [24] Critical materials in PEMFC systems and a LCA analysis for the potential reduction of environmental impacts with EoL strategies
    Stropnik, Rok
    Lotric, Andrej
    Montenegro, Alfonso Bernad
    Sekavcnik, Mihael
    Mori, Mitja
    ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2019, 7 (06) : 2519 - 2539
  • [25] Environmental impacts of eucalypt and maritime pine wood production in Portugal
    Dias, Ana Claudia
    Arroja, Luis
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 37 : 368 - 376
  • [26] Environmental impacts of reclamation and recycling processes of refrigerators using life cycle assessment (LCA) methods
    Xiao, Rufeng
    Zhang, You
    Yuan, Zengwei
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 131 : 52 - 59
  • [27] Economic and environmental analysis of PHAs production process
    Leong, Yoong Kit
    Show, Pau Loke
    Lan, John Chi-Wei
    Loh, Hwei-San
    Lam, Hon Loong
    Ling, Tau Chuan
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2017, 19 (07) : 1941 - 1953
  • [28] The environmental and economic impacts of photovoltaic waste management in Thailand
    Faircloth, Cameron C.
    Wagner, Kristen H.
    Woodward, Kristine E.
    Rakkwamsuk, Pattana
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 143 : 260 - 272
  • [29] Environmental Impacts of Electricity from Incineration and Gasification: How the LCA Approach Can Affect the Results
    Bianco, Isabella
    Panepinto, Deborah
    Zanetti, Mariachiara
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [30] LCA environmental impacts of Europe's housing stock and prevention scenarios
    Lavagna, Monica
    Sala, Serenella
    TECHNE-JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY FOR ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 15 : 291 - 298