Environmental and Economic Impacts of Hydroxyapatite Mineralized Wood: LCA and LCC Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Sitar, Matic [1 ,2 ]
Kitek Kuzman, Manja [2 ]
Oblak, Leon [2 ]
Remic, Katarina [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Slovenian Natl Bldg & Civil Engn Inst, Dimiceva Ul 12, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Jamnikarjeva 101, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[3] Univ Maribor, Fac Mech Engn, Smetanova Ul 17, Maribor 2000, Slovenia
来源
FORESTS | 2024年 / 15卷 / 09期
关键词
environmental impacts; hydroxyapatite; life cycle assessment (LCA); life cycle cost analysis (LCC); wood mineralization; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.3390/f15091532
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Wood is considered a promising raw material for the circular bioeconomy and has the ability to store biogenic carbon, and this is one reason why we want to extend the service life of the wood. In order to consider the influence of durability in our study, we used two wood species with different lifespans. Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) belongs to the group of very sensitive wood species, as the durability of the untreated wood is estimated to be around 5 years; meanwhile, pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) belongs to the group of moderately resistant wood species, where the durability of the untreated wood is estimated to be up to 15 years. While toxic chemicals are often used for wood preservation, hydroxyapatite offers an environmentally friendly solution for wood mineralization. This study presents life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC) analyses comparing a novel hydroxyapatite (HAp) mineralization method with a service life of 50 years to a non-mineralized reference alternative. LCA was based on EN ISO 14040 and EN ISO 14044, while LCC was adapted from the European Commission's LCC tool for public procurement. The results of the LCA show that mineralized wood has a lower overall impact on the environment than surface-treated beech wood but a higher impact than surface-treated pine wood. Most impact categories were determined by electricity consumption with the exception of stratospheric ozone depletion, water consumption, and land use. Water consumption proved to be the category where the mineralization process was problematic due to water consumption during the leaching process. The LCC showed that mineralized wood is the most cost-effective solution for the exterior fa & ccedil;ade, as all costs, but especially investment costs, were lower. The differences in the LCA and LCC results are mainly due to the different lifetimes of the two alternatives. It can be concluded that if energy-intensive processes and chemicals are used in the production of the material, the extended lifetime must be sufficient to account for the additional impacts that occur during the production phase.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental and economic analysis of a water network system using LCA and LCC
    Lim, Seong-Rin
    Park, Jong Moon
    AICHE JOURNAL, 2007, 53 (12) : 3253 - 3262
  • [2] Environmental and economic performance of residential buildings: LCA| LCC tool and case study in Colombia
    Jorge-Ortiz, Andrea
    Braulio-Gonzalo, Marta
    Bovea, Maria D.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 269
  • [3] The Environmental Impacts of Bar Soap Production: Uncovering Sustainability Risks with LCA Analysis
    Gaurav, Gaurav
    Dangayach, Govind Sharan
    Meena, Makkhan Lal
    Chaudhary, Vijay
    Gupta, Sumit
    Jagtap, Sandeep
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [4] Environmental and economic optima of solar home systems design: A combined LCA and LCC approach
    Rossi, Federico
    Heleno, Miguel
    Basosi, Riccardo
    Sinicropi, Adalgisa
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 744
  • [5] Economic and Environmental Assessment of Carbon Emissions from Demolition Waste Based on LCA and LCC
    Liu, Jingkuang
    Huang, Zhengjie
    Wang, Xuetong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (16)
  • [6] Assessing economic and environmental impacts of subsidies for organic fertilizer in vegetable production: insights from a combined PMP-LCA-LCC approach
    Deng, Lei
    Zhao, Jingjie
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [7] Environmental and economic assessment of hard apple cider using an integrated LCA-LCC approach
    Smith, Meghann
    Lal, Pankaj
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 32 : 282 - 295
  • [8] Environmental and economic sustainability in cultural heritage preventive conservation: LCA and LCC of innovative nanotechnology-based products
    Menegaldo, Martina
    Livieri, Arianna
    Isigonis, Panagiotis
    Pizzol, Lisa
    Tyrolt, Antonella
    Zabeo, Alex
    Semenzin, Elena
    Marcomini, Antonio
    CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2023, 9
  • [9] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Use of LCA to Assess the Environmental Impacts of the Composting Process
    Serafini, Lais Fabiana
    Feliciano, Manuel
    Rodrigues, Manuel Angelo
    Goncalves, Artur
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [10] LCA as a tool to evaluate the environmental impacts of products
    Wrzesinska-Jedrusiak, Edyta
    Laska-Zieja, Barbara
    Aleszczyk, Lukasz
    Fedko, Monika
    PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2016, 95 (11): : 2137 - 2140