The impacts of internal quality management relations on the triple bottom line: A dynamic capability perspective

被引:43
作者
Alsawafi A. [1 ]
Lemke F. [2 ]
Yang Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle University Business School, 5 Barrack Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne
[2] Vlerick Business School, Bolwerklaan 21 bus 32 1210, Brussels
关键词
Dynamic capabilities; Internal quality management relations; Sustainability performance; Triple bottom line;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107927
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper takes the dynamic capability (DC) theory as a theoretical perspective to investigate empirically the role of the internal dimensional view of quality management (QM) relations (management and employee) in driving sustainability performance, specifically social, environmental and economic dimensions. Data was collected from 226 UK manufacturing firms, and the relationships were empirically tested using structural equation modelling (SEM). The results show that internal management relation contributes to supporting employee relations and quality training. However, it is indirectly related to sustainability performance. In addition, management relations are indirectly connected with sustainability performance through employee relations. This study is relevant to academics and practitioners as it focuses on significant QM relations that are beneficial for the triple bottom line (TBL) of firms. As firms adopt QM relations to sustain their competitive advantage and achieve operational performance, it is crucial to identify which internal quality management relations associated with social, environmental and economic sustainability performance dimensions exert an influence. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 129 条
[51]  
Hendricks K.B., Singhal V.R., Does implementing an effective TQM program actually improve operating performance? Empirical evidence from firms that have won quality awards, Manag. Sci., 43, 9, pp. 1258-1274, (1997)
[52]  
Henseler J., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M., A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, J. Acad. Market. Sci., 43, 1, pp. 115-135, (2015)
[53]  
Hitt M.A., Carnes C.M., Xu K., A current view of resource based theory in operations management: a response to Bromiley and Rau, J. Oper. Manag., 41, 10, pp. 107-109, (2016)
[54]  
Hu L.T., Bentler P.M., Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Struct. Equ. Model.: a multidisciplinary journal, 6, 1, pp. 1-55, (1999)
[55]  
Hutchins M.J., Sutherland J.W., An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions, J. Clean. Prod., 16, 15, pp. 1688-1698, (2008)
[56]  
Inoue Y., Lee S., Effects of different dimensions of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance in tourism-related industries, Tourism Manag., 32, 4, pp. 790-804, (2011)
[57]  
Jabbour C.J.C., Santos F.C.A., Relationships between human resource dimensions and environmental management in companies: proposal of a model, J. Clean. Prod., 16, 1, pp. 51-58, (2008)
[58]  
Jackson S.A., Gopalakrishna-Remani V., Mishra R., Napier R., Examining the impact of design for environment and the mediating effect of quality management innovation on firm performance, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 173, pp. 142-152, (2016)
[59]  
Jayaram J., Ahire S.L., Dreyfus P., Contingency relationships of firm size, TQM duration, unionisation, and industry context on TQM implementation—a focus on total effects, J. Oper. Manag., 28, 4, pp. 345-356, (2010)
[60]  
Kaynak H., The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance, J. Oper. Manag., 21, 4, pp. 405-435, (2003)