Cowpea resistance and bioactivity of two diatomaceous earths against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on three cowpea varieties

被引:0
|
作者
Tofel K.H. [1 ]
Nukenine E.N. [2 ]
Fotso G.T. [2 ]
Wini J.G. [1 ]
Wadar E. [2 ]
Adler C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bamenda, PO Box 39, Bambili
[2] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Ngaoundere, PO Box 454, Ngaoundere
[3] Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants – Julius Kühn – Institut, Institute for Ecological Chemistry, Plant Analysis and Stored Product Protection, Königin-Luise-Str. 19, Berlin
来源
关键词
Callosobruchus maculatus; Cowpea variety; FossilShield®; SilicoSec®; Storage; Susceptibility;
D O I
10.1016/j.jspr.2021.101895
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) is the most important pest of stored cowpea in tropical climates. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the susceptibility of three cowpea varieties and the bioactivity of SilicoSec® and FossilShield® against this insect pest under ambient laboratory conditions at the contents 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 g/kg of cowpea. The Dobie susceptibility index for cowpea genotypes was estimated to compare their relative tolerance to this insect pest. Adult mortality was assessed after 1, 2, 4 and 6 days of exposure followed by the evaluation of the F1 progeny. Population increase, percentage seed damage and weight loss were assessed after three months of storage. The results showed that the CRPS and TN5-78 varieties were highly susceptible to C. maculatus, while Lori variety was moderately susceptible to the weevil. SilicoSec® and FossilShield® caused a significant and increasing bruchid mortality according to the dose rates and periods of exposure. Malathion 5% caused complete mortality after one day exposure time. SilicoSec® was more effective than FossilShield® on the three varieties of cowpea. The greatest dose of SilicoSec® and FossilShield® (2 g/kg) caused 100% mortality on all three varieties; 4 days of exposure in the Lori variety was the shortest exposure time leading to complete mortality. Regarding LD50 and LD95 values, it was observed that C. maculatus adults are more susceptible to SilicoSec® than to FossilShield®.The two formulations of diatomaceous earth (1.5 g/kg) reduced the F1 progeny by more than 70%, and produced less than 10% of seed damage and weight loss for the three varieties of cowpea. The varietal resistance and the use of diatomaceous earth against C. maculatus in storage could represent an alternative to Malagrain® for the protection of the cowpea. © 2021
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] RESISTANCE TO CALLOSOBRUCHUS-MACULATUS (COLEOPTERA, BRUCHIDAE) IN SELECTED COWPEA LINES
    MESSINA, FJ
    RENWICK, JAA
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1985, 14 (06) : 868 - 872
  • [42] Entomotoxicity of some agro-wastes against cowpea bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) [Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae] infesting cowpea seeds in storage
    Ashamo, Michael Olufemi
    Ileke, Kayode David
    Ogungbite, Olaniyi Charles
    HELIYON, 2021, 7 (06)
  • [43] Combination of Piper guineense Essential Oil with Cowpea Varietal Resistance in Control of Cowpea Seed Beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae)
    Samuel Adelani Babarinde
    Ebenezer Oluwaseun Esan
    Olagoke Zacchaeus Olatunde
    David Seye Ajayi
    Jesusegun Paul Olaniyi
    Journal of Northeast Agricultural University(English Edition), 2017, 24 (03) : 10 - 18
  • [44] Lethal and sublethal effects of chemical constituents from essential oils on Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) in cowpea stored grains
    Barbosa, Douglas Rafael e Silva
    de Oliveira, Jose Vargas
    da Silva, Paulo Henrique Soares
    Santana, Mauricea Fidelis
    Breda, Mariana Oliveira
    de Franca, Solange Maria
    de Miranda, Vinicius Lima
    JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2021, 128 (06) : 1575 - 1586
  • [45] Lethal and sublethal effects of chemical constituents from essential oils on Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) in cowpea stored grains
    Douglas Rafael e Silva Barbosa
    José Vargas de Oliveira
    Paulo Henrique Soares da Silva
    Mauricéa Fidelis Santana
    Mariana Oliveira Breda
    Solange Maria de França
    Vinícius Lima de Miranda
    Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 2021, 128 : 1575 - 1586
  • [46] RESISTANCE TO CALLOSOBRUCHUS-MACULATUS F (COL, BRUCHIDAE) IN SOME COWPEA VARIETIES FROM SENEGAL
    SECK, D
    JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 1993, 29 (01) : 49 - 52
  • [47] Toxicity of dietary avidin and streptavidin to the cowpea bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.)
    Murdock, L. L.
    Shade, R. E.
    JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 2008, 44 (02) : 193 - 197
  • [48] Biological control of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Bruchidae), during storage of cowpea
    Sanon, A
    Tricault, Y
    Ouedraogo, PA
    Huignard, J
    ANNALES DE LA SOCIETE ENTOMOLOGIQUE DE FRANCE, 1999, 35 : 496 - 501
  • [49] Pyramiding of insecticidal compounds for control of the cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus F.)
    Tarver, Matthew R.
    Shade, Richard E.
    Shukle, Richard H.
    Moar, William J.
    Muir, William M.
    Murdock, Larry M.
    Pittendrigh, Barry R.
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 63 (05) : 440 - 446
  • [50] Susceptibility of eight genetically improved local cultivars of cowpea to Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in Nigeria
    Lale, NES
    Kolo, AA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 1998, 44 (01) : 25 - 27