Cowpea resistance and bioactivity of two diatomaceous earths against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on three cowpea varieties

被引:0
|
作者
Tofel K.H. [1 ]
Nukenine E.N. [2 ]
Fotso G.T. [2 ]
Wini J.G. [1 ]
Wadar E. [2 ]
Adler C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bamenda, PO Box 39, Bambili
[2] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Ngaoundere, PO Box 454, Ngaoundere
[3] Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants – Julius Kühn – Institut, Institute for Ecological Chemistry, Plant Analysis and Stored Product Protection, Königin-Luise-Str. 19, Berlin
来源
关键词
Callosobruchus maculatus; Cowpea variety; FossilShield®; SilicoSec®; Storage; Susceptibility;
D O I
10.1016/j.jspr.2021.101895
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) is the most important pest of stored cowpea in tropical climates. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the susceptibility of three cowpea varieties and the bioactivity of SilicoSec® and FossilShield® against this insect pest under ambient laboratory conditions at the contents 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 g/kg of cowpea. The Dobie susceptibility index for cowpea genotypes was estimated to compare their relative tolerance to this insect pest. Adult mortality was assessed after 1, 2, 4 and 6 days of exposure followed by the evaluation of the F1 progeny. Population increase, percentage seed damage and weight loss were assessed after three months of storage. The results showed that the CRPS and TN5-78 varieties were highly susceptible to C. maculatus, while Lori variety was moderately susceptible to the weevil. SilicoSec® and FossilShield® caused a significant and increasing bruchid mortality according to the dose rates and periods of exposure. Malathion 5% caused complete mortality after one day exposure time. SilicoSec® was more effective than FossilShield® on the three varieties of cowpea. The greatest dose of SilicoSec® and FossilShield® (2 g/kg) caused 100% mortality on all three varieties; 4 days of exposure in the Lori variety was the shortest exposure time leading to complete mortality. Regarding LD50 and LD95 values, it was observed that C. maculatus adults are more susceptible to SilicoSec® than to FossilShield®.The two formulations of diatomaceous earth (1.5 g/kg) reduced the F1 progeny by more than 70%, and produced less than 10% of seed damage and weight loss for the three varieties of cowpea. The varietal resistance and the use of diatomaceous earth against C. maculatus in storage could represent an alternative to Malagrain® for the protection of the cowpea. © 2021
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laboratory evaluation of three underutilized Nigerian plants as cowpea seeds protectants against cowpea beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) [Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae]
    Ileke, Kayode David
    Ojo, Durojaye Olanrewaju
    Obembe, Olusola Michael
    Akinleye, Omolola Sola
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TROPICAL INSECT SCIENCE, 2022, 42 (02) : 1153 - 1163
  • [22] Impact of environmental conditions and seed physico-chemical characteristics on the resistance of cowpea genotypes to Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) infestation
    Kosini, D.
    Nukenine, N.
    Saidou, C.
    Noubissie, J-B T.
    Dolinassou, S.
    BULLETIN OF ENTOMOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 109 (05) : 595 - 603
  • [23] Impact of sublethal doses of Piper guineense (Schum and Thonn) on the biological parameters of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) reared on different cowpea varieties
    Gbaye, Olajire Ayo
    Oladipupo, Seun Olaitan
    Oyeniyi, Emmanuel Ayobami
    Oladipupo, Temitope Halimat
    JOURNAL OF ASIA-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGY, 2021, 24 (03) : 622 - 628
  • [24] Insecticidal activity of some seed powders against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on stored cowpea
    Emeasor, KC
    Ogbuji, RO
    Emosairue, SO
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENKRANKHEITEN UND PFLANZENSCHUTZ-JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2005, 112 (01): : 80 - 87
  • [25] Potential exploitation of Bacillus flexus biofilm against the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)
    Reda, Fifi M.
    Hassanein, Wesam A.
    Moabed, Shahera
    El-Shafiey, Samah N.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PEST CONTROL, 2020, 30 (01)
  • [26] Potential exploitation of Bacillus flexus biofilm against the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)
    Fifi M. Reda
    Wesam A. Hassanein
    Shahera Moabed
    Samah N. El-Shafiey
    Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 30
  • [27] Microwave radiation to control Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) larvae in cowpea cultivars
    Barbosa, Douglas Rafael e Silva
    Fontes, Lucia da Silva
    Ramalho Silva, Paulo Roberto
    Neves, Josynaria Araujo
    de Melo, Alyne Freire
    Esteves Filho, Alberto Belo
    AUSTRAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2017, 56 (01): : 70 - 74
  • [28] Determination of Residual Toxicity of Spinetoram Against Cowpea Weevil, (Callasobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchninae)
    Sular, Mert
    Saglam, Ozgur
    Isikber, Ali Arda
    JOURNAL OF TEKIRDAG AGRICULTURE FACULTY-TEKIRDAG ZIRAAT FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2019, 16 (02): : 133 - 143
  • [29] EVALUATION OF SUSCEPTIBILITY OF VARIETIES OF COWPEA TO CALLOSOBRUCHUS-MACULATUS (F) AND CALLOSOBRUCHUS-SUBINNOTATUS (PIC) (COLEOPTERA, BRUCHIDAE)
    MBATA, GN
    JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 1993, 29 (03) : 207 - 213
  • [30] Insecticidal toxicity of two bruchid-resistant cowpea cultivar powders as cowpea seed protectants against Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
    Ileke, Kayode D.
    FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY, 2019, 3 (01) : 35 - 39