Cowpea resistance and bioactivity of two diatomaceous earths against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on three cowpea varieties

被引:0
|
作者
Tofel K.H. [1 ]
Nukenine E.N. [2 ]
Fotso G.T. [2 ]
Wini J.G. [1 ]
Wadar E. [2 ]
Adler C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bamenda, PO Box 39, Bambili
[2] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Ngaoundere, PO Box 454, Ngaoundere
[3] Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants – Julius Kühn – Institut, Institute for Ecological Chemistry, Plant Analysis and Stored Product Protection, Königin-Luise-Str. 19, Berlin
来源
关键词
Callosobruchus maculatus; Cowpea variety; FossilShield®; SilicoSec®; Storage; Susceptibility;
D O I
10.1016/j.jspr.2021.101895
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) is the most important pest of stored cowpea in tropical climates. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the susceptibility of three cowpea varieties and the bioactivity of SilicoSec® and FossilShield® against this insect pest under ambient laboratory conditions at the contents 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 g/kg of cowpea. The Dobie susceptibility index for cowpea genotypes was estimated to compare their relative tolerance to this insect pest. Adult mortality was assessed after 1, 2, 4 and 6 days of exposure followed by the evaluation of the F1 progeny. Population increase, percentage seed damage and weight loss were assessed after three months of storage. The results showed that the CRPS and TN5-78 varieties were highly susceptible to C. maculatus, while Lori variety was moderately susceptible to the weevil. SilicoSec® and FossilShield® caused a significant and increasing bruchid mortality according to the dose rates and periods of exposure. Malathion 5% caused complete mortality after one day exposure time. SilicoSec® was more effective than FossilShield® on the three varieties of cowpea. The greatest dose of SilicoSec® and FossilShield® (2 g/kg) caused 100% mortality on all three varieties; 4 days of exposure in the Lori variety was the shortest exposure time leading to complete mortality. Regarding LD50 and LD95 values, it was observed that C. maculatus adults are more susceptible to SilicoSec® than to FossilShield®.The two formulations of diatomaceous earth (1.5 g/kg) reduced the F1 progeny by more than 70%, and produced less than 10% of seed damage and weight loss for the three varieties of cowpea. The varietal resistance and the use of diatomaceous earth against C. maculatus in storage could represent an alternative to Malagrain® for the protection of the cowpea. © 2021
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bio-insecticidal effectiveness of three formulations of diatomaceous earths against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in stored cowpea
    Charles Adarkwah
    Remember Roger Adjei
    Jacob Paarechuga Anankware
    Daniel Obeng-Ofori
    Christian Ulrichs
    Matthias Schöller
    Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 2021, 128 : 809 - 817
  • [2] Bio-insecticidal effectiveness of three formulations of diatomaceous earths against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in stored cowpea
    Adarkwah, Charles
    Adjei, Remember Roger
    Anankware, Jacob Paarechuga
    Obeng-Ofori, Daniel
    Ulrichs, Christian
    Scholler, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2021, 128 (03) : 809 - 817
  • [3] Resistance of some lentil cultivars against the cowpea beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
    Ebadi, Aryan
    Naseri, Bahram
    Besheli, Behnam Amiri
    Razmjou, Jabraeil
    Ebadollahi, Asgar
    Pourabad, Reza Farshbaf
    Elahi, Maryam
    Afshari, Forough
    JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 2025, 111
  • [4] Relative resistance of some cowpea varieties to Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)
    Edde, PA
    Amatobi, CI
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, 2000, 17 (2-3): : 67 - 77
  • [5] Effects of chemical- and bio-fertilizers on cowpea resistance to cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
    Naseri, Bahram
    Hamzavi, Fatemeh
    JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 2021, 92
  • [6] Oviposition choice and larval development of the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) on three cowpea varieties
    Kebe, Khadim
    Alvarez, Nadir
    Espindola, Anahi
    JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 2020, 86
  • [7] INSECTICIDAL EFFICACY OF TURKISH NOVEL DIATOMACEOUS EARTH FORMULATIONS AGAINST COWPEA WEEVIL Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (COLEOPTERA:CHRYSOMELIDAE:BRUCHNINAE) ON CHICKPEA
    Saglam, Ozgur
    Bozkurt, Huseyin
    Sen, Recep
    Hentes, Songul
    Isikber, Ali Arda
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2022, 31 (06): : 5839 - 5849
  • [8] Ozone as an alternative fumigant for controlling Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in cowpea beans
    Abreu, Artur Oliveira
    D'Antonino Faroni, Leda Rita
    de Assis Silva, Marcus Vinicius
    de Sousa, Adalberto Hipolito
    de Alencar, Ernandes Rodrigues
    Silva, Gutierres Nelson
    JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 2022, 97
  • [9] Components of Cowpea Resistance to the Seed Beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae)
    Messina, Frank J.
    Lish, Alexandra M.
    Gompert, Zachariah
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 2019, 112 (05) : 2418 - 2424
  • [10] Bioactivity of plant extracts from caatinga on cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae)
    Gomes, Camile D. L.
    de Sa, Jolinda M.
    de Godoy, Mauricio S.
    Molina-Rugama, Adrian J.
    de Oliveira, Luciano L.
    Pastori, Patrik L.
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA E AMBIENTAL, 2022, 26 (07): : 541 - 546