Evaluation Model of Land Force Weapon Equipment System Combat Capability Based on Improved SEM

被引：0
作者：
Shen B. [1 ]
Miao J. [1 ]
Li X. [1 ]
Jia G. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Information Center, China North Industries Group Corporation, Beijing
来源：
Binggong Xuebao/Acta Armamentarii | 2021年 / 42卷 / 11期
关键词：
Comprehensive evaluation; Index system; Linear weighted sum; Structural equation model; Weapon equipment system combat capability;
D O I：
10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2021.11.023
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The combat capability evaluation of weapon equipment system is significant for its development and operational applications, and the construction of evaluation model is the most critical aspect of combat capability evaluation. The evaluation steps of land force weapon equipment system combat capability were analyzed based on improved structural equation modeling (SEM), an evaluation index system of weapon equipment system combat capability was constructed, and the SEM was improved by reducing the dimension of multidimensional capability index system of land force weapon equipment system combat capability based on linear weighted sum method. The computational efficiency of SEM is increased, and the fast calculation and comprehensive evaluation of combat capability is realized by using the improved SEM. The entropy weight method and the analytic hierarchy process method are used to calculate the weight of aggregation index in the improved SEM, and the capability evaluation results of two kinds of weight aggregation indexes participating in the improved SEM are compared with those of SEM. The simulated results show that the change trends of the evaluated results are basically the same, thus validating and analyzing the accuracy and timeliness of the improved SEM. © 2021, Editorial Board of Acta Armamentarii. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：2503 / 2512
页数：9
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] ZHANG J, TANG H., Research on efficiency evaluation method, pp. 1-30, (2009)
  • [2] GUO Y J., Theory, method and application of comprehensive evaluation, pp. 1-10, (2007)
  • [3] KEENEY R L., Value-focused thinking: a path to creative decision-making, pp. 1-20, (1992)
  • [4] TAN Y J, CHEN Y W, LUO P C., Principle of system engineering, pp. 25-40, (2010)
  • [5] LIU W, LUO P C, ZHAO Z, Et al., Combat capability evaluation of ATR based on TOPSIS, Fire Control & Command Control, 34, 9, pp. 88-91, (2009)
  • [6] LUAN X F, WEN R., Evaluation for ship-to-ship missile weapon system effectiveness based on UML and ADC method, Computer & Digital Engineering, 38, 8, pp. 135-137, (2010)
  • [7] YANG J, ZHU Y L, HE R., SEM model and evaluation method for operational effectiveness assessment of equipment system, Command Control & Simulation, 38, 2, pp. 33-36, (2016)
  • [8] LU W L, HE X H, QU Q, Et al., Research on determining method for relationship of armament combat capability based on SEM, Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 37, 8, pp. 38-42, (2016)
  • [9] WANG Z Q, LIU G F., Combat capability evaluation of short range antimissile naval gun system based on SEM, Command Control & Simulation, 39, 4, pp. 85-91, (2017)
  • [10] LUO X M, ZHU Y L, HE R., SEM-based evaluation method of contribution to system warfighting for weapons and equipments, Journal of Equipment Academy, 26, 5, pp. 1-6, (2015)
12