Safety assessment of marine high-end equipment based on evidential reasoning approach under fuzzy uncertainty

被引:0
作者
Zhou M. [1 ,2 ]
Xiong X.-D. [1 ,2 ]
Pei F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Anhui, Hefei
[2] Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-making, Ministry of Education, Anhui, Hefei
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
evidential reasoning; group analytical hierarchical process; marine high-end equipment; Safety assessment; uncertainty;
D O I
10.3233/JIFS-237750
中图分类号
X9 [安全科学];
学科分类号
0837 ;
摘要
Marine high-end equipment reflects a country's comprehensive national strength. The safety assessment of it is very important to avoid accident either from human or facility factors. Attribute structure and assessment approach are two key points in the safety assessment of marine high-end equipment. In this paper, we construct a hierarchical attribute structure based on literature review and text mining of reports and news. The hierarchical attribute structure includes human, equipment, environment and management level. The correlations among these attributes are analyzed. The assessment standards of attributes are described in details. Different evaluation grades associated with attributes are transformed to a unified one by the given rules. As for the assessment approach, the evidential reasoning approach is applied for uncertain information fusion. Group analytical hierarchical process is used to generate attribute weights from a group of experts, where process aggregation method and result aggregation method are combined in a comprehensive way. The importance of expert is computed by the uncertainty measure of expert's subjective judgment. A drilling platform is finally assessed by the proposed attribute structure and assessment approach to illustrate the effectiveness of the assessment framework. © 2024 - IOS Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7495 / 7520
页数:25
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Han S.L., Wang W., Liu X.W., A new type-2 fuzzy multi-criteria hybrid method for rail transit operation safety assessment, Applied Soft Computing, 113, 2021
[2]  
Zhang D., Yan X.P., Yang Z.L., Wall A., Wang J., Incorporation of formal safety assessment and Bayesian network in navigational risk estimation of the Yangtze River, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 118, pp. 93-105, (2013)
[3]  
Wang L., Liu Q., Dong S.Y., Soares C.G., Effectiveness assessment of ship navigation safety countermeasures using fuzzy cognitive maps, Safety Science, 117, pp. 352-364, (2019)
[4]  
Hsu W.K.K., Huang S.H.S., Yeh R.F.J., An assessment model of safety factors for product tankers in coastal shipping, Safety Science, 76, pp. 74-81, (2015)
[5]  
Zhang L.B., Wu S.N., Zheng W.P., Fan J.C., A dynamic and quantitative risk assessment method with uncertainties for offshore managed pressure drilling phases, Safety Science, 104, pp. 39-54, (2018)
[6]  
Liu Z.K., Ma Q., Et al., A dynamic quantitative risk assessment method for drilling well control by integrating multi types of risk factors, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 167, 2022, pp. 162-172
[7]  
Liu K.Y., Cai B.P., Et al., Risk identification and assessment methods of offshore platform equipment and operations, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 2023, pp. 1415-1430
[8]  
Balmat J.F., Lafont F., Maifret R., Pessel N., MAritime Risk Assessment (MARISA), a fuzzy approach to define an individual ship risk factor, Ocean Engineering, 36, pp. 1278-1286, (2009)
[9]  
Li H., Diaz H., Soares C.G., A developed failure mode and effect analysis for floating offshore wind turbine support structures, Renewable Energy, 164, 2021, pp. 133-145
[10]  
Kaliszewski I., Podkopaev D., Simple additive weighting-A metamodel for multiple criteria decision analysis methods, Expert Systems With Applications, 54, pp. 155-161, (2016)