A European right to end-to-end encryption?

被引：0
作者：
Shurson, Jessica [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Sussex, Law, Freeman Bldg, Brighton BN19QE, England
来源：
COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW | 2024年 / 55卷
关键词：
D O I：
10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106063
中图分类号：
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号：
0301 ;
摘要：
In Podchasov v Russia, , the European Court of Human Rights unanimously held that a Russian statutory obligation on 'internet communications organisers' to provide information to state authorities that allowed for the decryption of encrypted communications was a disproportionate interference with Article 8 because the available technical means of decryption risked weakening the security of communications for all users of the service. This is significant as authorities in the UK and EU may seek to implement similar statutory obligations on communications service providers.
引用
收藏
页数：6
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [21] Europol/Eurojust joint press release, 2020, Dismantling of an encrypted network sends shockwaves through organized crime groups across Europe'
  • [22] Gillespie Alisdair, 2021, Electronic Evidence and Electronic Signatures, VFifth
  • [23] Goodwin Bill, 2023, ComputerWeekly.com17 June
  • [24] House of Lords, Online Safety Bill, Hansard, V832
  • [25] Kerr OS, 2018, GEORGETOWN LAW J, V106, P989
  • [26] Loideain Nora Ni, 2021, EU Data Privacy Law and Serious Crime
  • [27] Meister Andre, 2024, netzpolitik.org10 May
  • [28] Nottingham Mark, 2024, No One Should Have That Much Power'
  • [29] Office of the United National High Commissioner for Human Rights, 2022, Report on the right to privacy in the digital age'
  • [30] Peersman Claudia, 2023, Rephrain: Towards a Framework for Evaluating CSAM Prevention and Detection Tools in the Context of End -to -end encryption Environments: a Case Study
1234