A review of supply chain integration constructs and a framework for future research

被引：3
作者：
Atadeniz S.N. [1 ]
Acar Y. [2 ]
Sridharan V. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Management, The University of St. Thomas, 3800 Montrose, Houston, 77006, TX
[2] Management Department, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Bogazici University Bogazici University, Bebek, Istanbul
[3] Department of Management, College of Business, Clemson University, 100 Sirrine Hall, Clemson, 29634-1305, SC
来源：
International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences | 2021年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词：
Construct measurement; Integration; Supply chain; Survey; Systematic review;
D O I：
10.1504/IJADS.2021.113527
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The purpose of this study is to assess the consistency of construct definition and measurement in the survey-based supply chain integration literature. A lack of consistency has been widely recognised and has contributed to a certain indiscernibility concerning the relationship between supply chain integration and performance. This study includes a comprehensive and systematic review of integration constructs and their measurement items, as well as on-site interviews with vice presidents responsible for overseeing supply chain operations in global corporations. Our analysis reveals the inconsistencies within the existing integration constructs and demonstrates how this may have contributed to a lack of consensus across the findings of existing empirical studies. To address this problem, we present the dimensions of supply chain integration and their interrelationships in a logical framework revealing the multiplicity of the integration dynamics. The framework will enable future researchers to consistently define and operationalise integration in supply chain research studies. © 2021 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：151 / 184
页数：33
相关论文
共 169 条
  • [11] Autry C.W., Rose W.J., Bell J.E., Reconsidering the supply chain integrationperformance relationship: in search of theoretical consistency and clarity, Journal of Business Logistics, 35, 3, pp. 275-276, (2014)
  • [12] Bagchi P.K., Ha B.C., Skjoett-Larsen T., Soerensen L.B., Supply chain integration: a European survey, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16, 2, pp. 275-294, (2005)
  • [13] Barratt M., Barratt R., Exploring internal and external supply chain linkages: evidence from the field, Journal of Operations Management, 29, 5, pp. 514-528, (2011)
  • [14] Basnet C., The measurement of internal supply chain integration, Management Research Review, 36, 2, pp. 153-172, (2013)
  • [15] Beheshti H.M., Oghazi P., Mostaghel R., Hultman M., Supply chain integration and firm performance: an empirical study of Swedish manufacturing firms, Competitiveness Review, 24, 1, pp. 20-31, (2014)
  • [16] Bhakoo V., Singh P.J., Chia A., Supply chain structures shaping portfolio of technologies, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 45, 4, pp. 376-399, (2015)
  • [17] Boon-itt S., Wong C.Y., The moderating effects of technological and demand uncertainties on the relationship between supply chain integration and customer delivery performance, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 41, 3, pp. 253-276, (2011)
  • [18] Bowersox D.J., Closs D.J., Logistical Management: The Integrated Supply Chains Process, (1996)
  • [19] Braunscheidel M.J., Suresh N.C., The organizational antecedents of a firm's supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response, Journal of Operations Management, 27, 2, pp. 119-140, (2009)
  • [20] Bruque-Camara S., Moyano-Fuentes J., Maqueira-Marin J.M., Supply chain integration through community cloud: effects on operational performance, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22, 2, pp. 141-153, (2016)
12345678910