Systematic Selective Limits Application Using Decision-Making Engines to Enhance Safety in Highly Automated Vehicles

被引:0
|
作者
Garikapati, Divya [1 ]
Liu, Yiting [1 ]
Huo, Zhaoyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Woven Toyota, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
来源
SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONNECTED AND AUTOMATED VEHICLES | 2025年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
Automated vehicles; Connected vehicles; V2I; Multicriteria decision making; (MCDM); Technique for order; of preference by similarity to; ideal solution (TOPSIS); Machine learning; Artificial; intelligence; Self-driving; Autonomy software; Control; limits; Functional safety; Cloud-based; database; Multiple safety; profiles; Operational design; domain (ODD); Systematic; approach; Safety engineering; Safety limits; Scenario; COLLISION-AVOIDANCE; AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES; MODEL;
D O I
10.4271/12-08-01-0005
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
The traditional approach to applying safety limits in electromechanical systems across various industries, including automated vehicles, robotics, and aerospace, involves hard-coding control and safety limits into production firmware, which remains fixed throughout the product life cycle. However, with the evolving needs of automated systems such as automated vehicles and robots, this approach falls short in addressing all use cases and scenarios to ensure safe operation. Particularly for data-driven machine learning applications that continuously evolve, there is a need for a more flexible and adaptable safety limits application strategy based on different operational design domains (ODDs) and scenarios. The ITSC conference paper [1] introduced the dynamic control limits application (DCLA) strategy, supporting the flexible application of diverse limits profiles based on dynamic scenario parameters across different layers of the Autonomy software stack. This article extends the DCLA strategy by outlining a methodology for safety limits application based on ODD utilizes a layered architecture and cloud infrastructure based on vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) technology to store scenarios and limits mapping as a ground truth or backup mechanism for the DM engine. Additionally, the article focuses on providing a subset of driving scenarios as case studies that correspond to a subset of the ODD elements, which forms the baseline to derive the safety limits and create four different application profiles or classes of limits. Finally, the real-world examples of "driving-in-rain" scenario variations have been considered to apply DM engines and classify them into the previously identified limits application profiles or classes. This example can be further compared with different DM engines as a future work potential that offers a scalable solution for automated vehicles and systems up to Level 5 Autonomy within the industry.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 70
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Verification and Validation Methods for Decision-Making and Planning of Automated Vehicles: A Review
    Ma, Yining
    Sun, Chen
    Chen, Junyi
    Cao, Dongpu
    Xiong, Lu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT VEHICLES, 2022, 7 (03): : 480 - 498
  • [2] Strategic customer foresight: From research to strategic decision-making using the example of highly automated vehicles
    Schweitzer, Nicola
    Hofmann, Rupert
    Meinheit, Andreas
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 144 : 49 - 65
  • [3] Interaction-Aware Decision-Making for Automated Vehicles Using Social Value Orientation
    Crosato, Luca
    Shum, Hubert P. H.
    Ho, Edmond S. L.
    Wei, Chongfeng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT VEHICLES, 2023, 8 (02): : 1339 - 1349
  • [4] Interactive Decision-Making With Switchable Game Modes for Automated Vehicles at Intersections
    Jia, Shizheng
    Zhang, Yuxiang
    Li, Xin
    Na, Xiaoxiang
    Wang, Yuhai
    Gao, Bingzhao
    Zhu, Bing
    Yu, Rongjie
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 24 (11) : 11785 - 11799
  • [5] Editorial: Automated vehicles: intelligent decision-making, trajectory planning, and chassis execution
    Cheng, Shuo
    Li, Liang
    Lei, Yong
    Xia, Xin
    Lv, Chen
    FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI, 2024, 11
  • [6] An Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) Method of Risk Prediction for Decision-Making of Autonomous Vehicles
    Shi, Xiupeng
    Wong, Yiik Diew
    Chai, Chen
    Li, Michael Zhi-Feng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 22 (11) : 7145 - 7154
  • [7] A Survey of Decision-Making Safety Assessment Methods for Autonomous Vehicles
    Pang, Zhaowen
    Chen, Zhenbin
    Lu, Jiayi
    Zhang, Mengyue
    Feng, Xinjie
    Chen, Yuyi
    Yang, Shichun
    Cao, Yaoguang
    IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2024, 16 (01) : 74 - 103
  • [8] Reliable safety decision-making for autonomous vehicles: a safety assurance reinforcement learning
    Niu, Yuchen
    Wang, Yongjie
    Xiao, Mei
    Zhu, Wenying
    Wang, Tao
    TRANSPORTMETRICA B-TRANSPORT DYNAMICS, 2025, 13 (01)
  • [9] Convolutional Neural Network-Based Intelligent Decision-Making for Automated Vehicles
    Cheng, Shuo
    Wang, Zheng
    Yang, Bo
    Nakano, Kimihiko
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (27): : 509 - 514
  • [10] A differentiated decision-making algorithm for automated vehicles based on pedestrian feature estimation
    Wang, Yuning
    Huang, Heye
    Zhang, Bo
    Wang, Jianqiang
    IET INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, 2023, 17 (07) : 1454 - 1466