Spatial effects of renewable and fossil energy consumption on the ecological footprint for the EU Countries

被引:1
作者
Bucak, Çağla [1 ]
Önder, A. Özlem [1 ]
Çatık, Abdurrahman Nazif [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Economics, Ege University, Izmir, Bornova
关键词
Ecological footprint; EKC; EU countries; Fossil energy; Globalization; Renewable energy; Spatial econometrics;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-024-34803-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examines the spillover of pollution among the 26 European Union (EU) countries from 1995 to 2020. In order to quantify pollution spillovers among the countries, we estimated the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) using spatial econometric methods. Our research is unique in that it investigates ecological footprint spillovers for EU countries. This study also considers the direct and indirect effects of renewable and fossil energy consumption and globalization on environmental degradation in EU countries. The empirical results favor the validity of the EKC hypothesis. Our results support the presence of positive and significant ecological footprint spillovers among EU countries. Our spatial estimates also reveal the significant spillover impact of explanatory variables on the ecological footprint. The ecological footprint of the local country is declining owing to the consumption of renewable energy in neighboring countries. Furthermore, the fossil energy consumption of the local and neighboring countries has a positive impact on the ecological footprint. Evidence obtained from our spatial estimates provides useful insights to policymakers in developing appropriate environmental policies to combat climate change. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024.
引用
收藏
页码:55204 / 55221
页数:17
相关论文
共 116 条
  • [1] Ahmad M., Jiang P., Murshed M., Shehzad K., Akram R., Cui L., Khan Z., Modelling the dynamic linkages between eco-innovation, urbanization, economic growth and ecological footprints for G7 countries: Does financial globalization matter?, Sustain Cit Soc, 70, (2021)
  • [2] Ahmed Z., Wang Z., Mahmood F., Hafeez M., Ali N., Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia, Environ Sci Pollut Res, 26, pp. 18565-18582, (2019)
  • [3] AL-Barakani A., Bin L., Zhang X., Et al., Spatial analysis of financial development’s effect on the ecological footprint of belt and road initiative countries: Mitigation options through renewable energy consumption and institutional quality, J Clean Prod, 366, (2022)
  • [4] Aluko O.A., Osei Opoku E.E., Ibrahim M., Investigating the environmental effect of globalization: insights from selected industrialized countries, J Environ Manag, 281, (2021)
  • [5] Anselin L., Spatial econometrics: Methods and models, (1988)
  • [6] Anselin L., Bera A.K., Florax R., Yoon M., Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence, Reg Sci Urban Econ, 26, pp. 77-104, (1996)
  • [7] Arogundade S., Mduduzi B., Hassan A.S., Spatial impact of foreign direct investment on ecological footprint in Africa, Environ Sci Pollut Res, 29, pp. 51589-51608, (2022)
  • [8] Balado-Naves R., Banos-Pino J.F., Mayor M., Do countries influence neighbouring pollution? A spatial analysis of the EKC for CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, Energy Policy, 123, pp. 266-279, (2018)
  • [9] Balsalobre-Lorente D., Driha O.M., Leitao N.C., Murshed M., The carbon dioxide neutralizing effect of energy innovation on international tourism in EU-5 countries under the prism of the EKC hypothesis, J Environ Manag, 298, (2021)
  • [10] Balsalobre-Lorente D., Leitao N.C., Bekun F.S., Fresh Validation of the Low Carbon Development Hypothesis under the EKC Scheme in Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain, Energies, 14, (2021)