In silico analysis on sacroiliac joint fixation during normal walking

被引:0
|
作者
Toyohara, Ryota [1 ,2 ]
Kurosawa, Daisuke [3 ]
Hammer, Niels [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Ohashi, Toshiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, N13W8, Kita-ku, Hokkaido, Sapporo
[2] Creative Research Institution, Hokkaido University, N12W7, Kita-ku, Hokkaido, Sapporo
[3] Japan Sacroiliac Joint and Low Back Pain Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, JCHO Sendai Hospital, 2-1-1 Murasakiyama, Izumi-ku, Miyagi, Sendai
[4] Division of Clinical and Macroscopic Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 25, Graz
[5] Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, Leipzig
[6] Division of Biomechatronics, Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology (IWU), Nöthnitzer Str. 44, Dresden
来源
Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering | 2024年 / 19卷 / 04期
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Arthrodesis; Finite element analysis; Implant; Pelvic kinematics; Sacroiliac joint; Walking analysis;
D O I
10.1299/jbse.24-00036
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
According to medical statistics, sacroiliac joints (SIJs) appear to be the source of low back pain in 15–30% of cases. The SIJs are located at the junction between the sacrum and the ilium, supported by strong ligaments and with low mobility. Due to unexpected external force or repeated impact, pain may arise from the SIJ region (SIJ dysfunction). The treatment to cure SIJ dysfunction includes nonsurgical approaches as well as surgery with implants (SIJ fixation). Previous studies have assessed the consequences of SIJ fixation, but no simulation study so far has been performed during walking. The SIJ is burdened with variant loads during walking. In this given study, walking conditions were replicated in a finite element model of the pelvis combined with 3D walking analysis data. The simulation mimicked two types of unilateral SIJ fixation: anterior fixation with a plate implant and screws (model A) and posterior fixation with a rod, a cage and screws (model P). Equivalent stress of the SIJ and the loading of the SIJ ligaments decreased in the fixed models. In these fixed pelves, the slight motion on the SIJ decreased. The reduction rates on equivalent stress, ligament loads and equivalent stress were low during the swing phase. In addition, the efficiency of fixations was mostly same on anterior and posterior fixations. It can be concluded that the stronger fixation reduces the loading but also may have a greater impairment effects on walking. © 2024 The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Finite Element Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Fixation under Compression Loads
    Bruna-Rosso, Claire
    Arnoux, Pierre-Jean
    Bianco, Rohan-Jean
    Godio-Raboutet, Yves
    Fradet, Leo
    Aubin, Carl-Eric
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 10
  • [2] Biomechanical analysis of the number of implants for the immediate sacroiliac joint fixation
    Dube-Cyr, Roxanne
    Aubin, Carl-Eric
    Villemure, Isabelle
    Arnoux, Pierre-Jean
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2021, 9 (05) : 1267 - 1273
  • [3] Biomechanical analysis of the number of implants for the immediate sacroiliac joint fixation
    Roxanne Dubé-Cyr
    Carl-Éric Aubin
    Isabelle Villemure
    Pierre-Jean Arnoux
    Spine Deformity, 2021, 9 : 1267 - 1273
  • [4] Quantitative evaluation of the sacroiliac joint fixation in stress reduction on both sacroiliac joint cartilage and ligaments: A finite element analysis
    Venayre, Brice
    Koyama, Yuichiro
    Kurosawa, Daisuke
    Hammer, Niels
    Lingslebe, Uwe
    Murakami, Eiichi
    Ozawa, Hiroshi
    Ohashi, Toshiro
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2021, 85
  • [5] A biomechanical investigation of the sacroiliac joint in the setting of lumbosacral fusion: impact of pelvic fixation versus sacroiliac joint fixation
    Mushlin, Harry
    Brooks, Daina M.
    Olexa, Joshua
    Ferrick, Bryan J.
    Carbine, Stephen
    Hayward, Gerald M., II
    Bucklen, Brandon S.
    Sansur, Charles A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 31 (04) : 562 - 567
  • [6] Sacroiliac Joint Degeneration After Lumbopelvic Fixation
    Nakashima, Hiroaki
    Kanemura, Tokumi
    Satake, Kotaro
    Ito, Kenyu
    Tanaka, Satoshi
    Segi, Naoki
    Ouchida, Jun
    Kagami, Yujiro
    Ando, Kei
    Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi
    Imagama, Shiro
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (06) : 1158 - 1164
  • [7] Biomechanical analysis of two insertion sites for the fixation of the sacroiliac joint via an oblique lateral approach
    Dube-Cyr, Roxanne
    Aubin, Carl-Eric
    Villemure, Isabelle
    Bianco, Rohan-Jean
    Godio-Raboutet, Yves
    Arnoux, Pierre-Jean
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2020, 74 : 118 - 123
  • [8] Comparative analysis of the lateral and posterolateral trajectories for fixation of the sacroiliac joint—a cadaveric study
    Christopher Payne
    Stephen Jaffee
    Isaac Swink
    Daniel Cook
    Matthew Yeager
    Michael Oh
    Gary Schmidt
    Derek P. Lindsey
    Scott A. Yerby
    Boyle Cheng
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15
  • [9] An In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis of Contralateral Sacroiliac Joint Motion Following Unilateral Sacroiliac Stabilization with and without Lumbosacral Fixation
    Cho, Woojin
    Wang, Wenhai
    Lim, Hyun Jin
    Bucklen, Brandon S.
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 17 (01) : 185 - 193
  • [10] Sacroiliac joint stabilization using implants provide better fixation in females compared to males: a finite element analysis
    Amin Joukar
    Ali Kiapour
    Anoli Shah
    Ardalan Seyed Vosoughi
    Vijay K. Goel
    European Spine Journal, 2021, 30 : 2351 - 2359