Toward a reference terminology for product-service systems in the manufacturing domain

被引：0
作者：
May G. [1 ]
Cho S. [2 ]
Correia A.T. [3 ]
Siafaka R. [3 ]
Stokic D. [3 ]
Kiritsis D. [4 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of North Florida
[2] School of Engineering Technology, Purdue University
[3] Institute for Applied System Technology, ATB-Bremen, Bremen
[4] Department of Mechanical Engineering, EPFL (SCI-STI-DK), Lausanne
来源：
Computers in Industry | 2022年 / 142卷
关键词：
Discrete manufacturing; Industry; 4.0; Ontology; Product service system; Reference terminology;
D O I：
10.1016/j.compind.2022.103729
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Recently, products and services have become joint commodities, in contrast to the traditional focus on products alone. Thus, modern industrial companies need to manage product-service systems (PSSs) as part of a competitive strategy. PSSs are comprised of complex, related products and services; stakeholders; processes; and environments. It is therefore important to identify, integrate, and manage information from different data-sources. This paper introduces the critical issues facing PSSs and provides reference terminology for PSSs in the form of an ontology. This ontology represents a generic PSS that not only adds value to the PSS design but also offers the potential to improve individual products and services in the system. Thus, in this paper, we aim to facilitate communication between stakeholders from different domains and integrate heterogeneous data from various data-sources during the PSS lifecycle. As a result, our paper supports the design and delivery of PSS components by providing a generic PSS ontology for the manufacturing domain, and a glossary of entities, with concrete, unambiguous definitions. The research that led to the development of the proposed generic PSS ontology resulted from the collaboration of several academic and industrial partners in two EU projects: DIVERSITY and FALCON. © 2022 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Akmal S., Shih L.H., Batres R., Ontology-based similarity for product information retrieval, Comput. Ind., 65, 1, pp. 91-107, (2014)
  • [2] Annamalai G., Hussain R., Cakkol M., Roy R., Evans S., Tiwari A., An ontology for product-service systems, Functional Thinking for value creation, pp. 231-236, (2011)
  • [3] Annarelli A., Battistella C., Costantino F., Di Gravio G., Nonino F., Patriarca R., New trends in product service system and servitization research: A conceptual structure emerging from three decades of literature, CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., 32, pp. 424-436, (2021)
  • [4] Arp R., Smith B., Spear A.D., Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology, (2015)
  • [5] Baines T.S., Lightfoot H.W., Evans S., Neely A., Greenough R., Peppard J., Wilson H., State-of-the-art in product-service systems, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf., 221, 10, pp. 1543-1552, (2007)
  • [6] Cho S., May G., Kiritsis D., (2019)
  • [7] Correia A., Stokic D., Siafaka R., Scholze S., (2017)
  • [8] Dong M., Su L.Y., Ontology-based product-service system configuration of mass customization, Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst., 17, 3, pp. 653-661, (2011)
  • [9] Fogarassy C., Finger D., (2020)
  • [10] Goedkoop M.J., Van Halen C.J., Te Riele H.R., Rommens P.J., Product service systems, ecological and economic basics, Rep. Dutch Minist. Environ. VROM Econ. Aff. EZ, 36, 1, pp. 1-122, (1999)
1234