Wind Hazard Fragility Analysis of Transmission Free-standing Towers Using Quasi-static Method

被引:0
|
作者
He H. [1 ]
Wang D. [1 ]
Huang Z. [2 ]
Zhang Z. [2 ]
机构
[1] College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Hubei Province, Wuhan
[2] CSG Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangdong Province, Guangzhou
关键词
failure criterion; fragility; nonlinear static pushover analysis; transmission tower; wind direction angle;
D O I
10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.222189
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is significant to understand the wind disaster prediction and operations management so as to evaluate the wind resistance bearing performance and safety margin on existing transmission tower. In this paper, an effective method of tower fragility considering varies wind direction is carried out. Firstly, based on the principle of wind engineering, a quasi-static analysis framework is applied to determine the extreme probability distribution of wind load of tower under different design wind speeds. The uncertainty and initial defects of structure, which include wind bearing capacity performance and corresponding failure criterion of tower structure are investigated later by using nonlinear static pushover analysis (NSPA). The next step is obtaining the probability model of the wind bearing capacity of structure using random sampling analysis, and finally the wind disaster fragility curve of the tower under different wind direction can be calculated by using limit state function. This study shows that: 1) the probability distribution of wind effect based on quasi-static analysis framework can be obtained by using the first transcendental probability theory. 2) On the other hand, the quasi-static base shear response is not affected by the nonlinear status of the structure, and can be used as an evaluation indicator of the overall wind load. 3) Based on the internal relationship between yield failure and overall failure, a reasonable failure criterion of slight, severe and collapse can be established. 4) The wind angle has a significant influence of the wind bearing capacity and the tower vulnerability. In this paper, the tower has the highest vulnerability probability under the wind angle of 60°. © 2024 Chin.Soc.for Elec.Eng.
引用
收藏
页码:3732 / 3741
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] HUANG Zhiming, Prospects of future developments of China’s transmission technology in 21th century [J], International Electric Power for China, 3, pp. 29-33, (2000)
  • [2] FU Xing, Hongnan LI, Gang LI, Failure analysis of a transmission line considering the joint probability distribution of wind speed and rain intensity [J], Engineering Structures, 233, (2021)
  • [3] WANG Dahai, Xinzhong CHEN, Jie LI, Prediction of wind-induced buffeting response of overhead conductor:comparison of linear and nonlinear analysis approaches [J], Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 167, pp. 23-40, (2017)
  • [4] MEHTA K C,, KADABA R., Field data analysis of electrical conductor response to winds[J], Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 36, pp. 329-338, (1990)
  • [5] LIN W E,, SAVORY E, MCINTYRE R P, The response of an overhead electrical power transmission line to two types of wind forcing[J], Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 100, 1, pp. 58-69, (2012)
  • [6] International Electrical Commission.IEC 60826—2017 Design criteria of overhead transmission lines[S], (2017)
  • [7] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China.GB 50545—2010 Code for design of 110kV~750kV overhead transmission line, (2010)
  • [8] ALBERMANI F, KITIPORNCHAI S, CHAN R W K., Failure analysis of transmission towers[J], Engineering Failure Analysis, 16, 6, pp. 1922-1928, (2009)
  • [9] ASGARIAN B, ESLAMLOU S D, ZAGHI A E, Progressive collapse analysis of power transmission towers[J], Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 123, pp. 31-40, (2016)
  • [10] YANG Shucheng, HONG Hanping, Nonlinear inelastic responses of transmission tower-line system under downburst wind[J], Engineering Structures, 123, pp. 490-500, (2016)