Development of a robust Machine learning model for Ames test outcome prediction

被引:0
作者
Borah, Gori Sankar [1 ]
Nagamani, Selvaraman [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Assam Kaziranga Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Jorhat 785006, India
[2] CSIR North East Inst Sci & Technol, Jorhat 785006, India
[3] Acad Sci & Innovat Res AcSIR, Ghaziabad 201002, India
关键词
Ames mutagenicity; Multi-step feature selection; Machine learning; XGBoost; ACCURATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cplett.2024.141663
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The mutagenicity is an essential parameter for evaluating the safety of pharmaceuticals, chemicals, consumer products, environmentally related compounds and the Ames assay is a significant test for predicting the mutagenicity of chemical compounds. In the data-driven era, developing robust models for efficient mutagenicity prediction before synthesizing and testing in vitro has gained increasing attention. In this study, a machine learning model that could predict Ames mutagenicity based on 2D molecular descriptors was developed. A multistep filtering process that adequately helps in identifying significant descriptors was adopted in this study. Three different sets of descriptors, namely, RDKit, Mordred and CDK were used to train three machine learning algorithms, viz., random forest, xgboost and catboost. The datasets were collected from different resources to develop a robust machine learning model. The robustness of this model was further validated by comparing different available ML and DL models for Ames genotoxicity. Specifically, 12 models, including our xgboost model, were used to validate an external dataset, and our model exhibited excellent performance, with an impressive AUC of 0.97. The codes to predict the genotoxicity of a molecule is available at https://github. com/Naga270588/Genotoxicity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [31] AMPred-CNN: Ames mutagenicity prediction model based on convolutional neural networks
    Tran T.T.V.
    Tayara H.
    Chong K.T.
    [J]. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2024, 176
  • [32] FP-ADMET: a compendium of fingerprint-based ADMET prediction models
    Venkatraman, Vishwesh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMINFORMATICS, 2021, 13 (01)
  • [33] In silico model for mutagenicity (Ames test), taking into account metabolism
    Vian, Matteo
    Raitano, Giuseppa
    Roncaglioni, Alessandra
    Benfenati, Emilio
    [J]. MUTAGENESIS, 2019, 34 (01) : 41 - 48
  • [34] How accurate is in vitro prediction of carcinogenicity?
    Walmsley, Richard Maurice
    Billinton, Nicholas
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 162 (06) : 1250 - 1258
  • [35] Interpretable-ADMET: a web service for ADMET prediction and optimization based on deep neural representation
    Wei, Yu
    Li, Shanshan
    Li, Zhonglin
    Wan, Ziwei
    Lin, Jianping
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 38 (10) : 2863 - 2871
  • [36] Trade-off Predictivity and Explainability for Machine-Learning Powered Predictive Toxicology: An in-Depth Investigation with Tox21 Data Sets
    Wu, Leihong
    Huang, Ruili
    Tetko, Igor, V
    Xia, Zhonghua
    Xu, Joshua
    Tong, Weida
    [J]. CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 2021, 34 (02) : 541 - 549
  • [37] ADMETlab 2.0: an integrated online platform for accurate and comprehensive predictions of ADMET properties
    Xiong, Guoli
    Wu, Zhenxing
    Yi, Jiacai
    Fu, Li
    Yang, Zhijiang
    Hsieh, Changyu
    Yin, Mingzhu
    Zeng, Xiangxiang
    Wu, Chengkun
    Lu, Aiping
    Chen, Xiang
    Hou, Tingjun
    Cao, Dongsheng
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (W1) : W5 - W14
  • [38] In silico Prediction of Chemical Ames Mutagenicity
    Xu, Congying
    Cheng, Feixiong
    Chen, Lei
    Du, Zheng
    Li, Weihua
    Liu, Guixia
    Lee, Philip W.
    Tang, Yun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2012, 52 (11) : 2840 - 2847