Success and Failure Aspects of LMS in E-Learning Systems

被引:0
作者
Alhazmi A.K. [1 ]
Imtiaz A. [2 ]
Al-Hammadi F. [3 ]
Kaed E. [3 ]
机构
[1] University of Science and Technology, Aden
[2] Massey University, Palmerston North
[3] Interactive Language Centre, Kuala Lumpur
关键词
Course Management System (CMS); e-Assessment; E-learning; Emerging Technologies; Learning Management System (LMS); Learning Outcomes; Online Learning; Student Engagement;
D O I
10.3991/ijim.v15i11.20805
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Learning management systems (LMS) and their associated tools have created value for higher education institutions worldwide by improving content deliverability, accessibility, and retrievability. Nevertheless, many studies have criticized these systems for their teacher-centred approaches, limiting opportunities for social and informal learning. After several decades of institutions using LMS, this research aims to discuss the success and failure aspects of these LMS from various perspectives, including structure, content, and support for emerging technologies. A thematic literature review and analysis, success and failure aspects are organized and verified by LMS experts. Alongside the aspects identified from the literature, these experts also noted several additional aspects of success and failure in LMS. Overall, the analysis results indicated the success aspects of LMS relate to seven key factors: single sign-on, learning management, content management, integration, security, tracking, and group management. Similarly, the failure aspects could be classified into eight factors: content creation and sharing, communicative features, structure, learning engagement, assessment, user interfaces, social and informal learning, and mobile features. The implications of the research for education institutions, instructors, developers, and system providers and the resulting directions for future research are thus also discussed. © 2021
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 147
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Malcolm Brown J. D., Educ. Rev, 50, 4
  • [2] Smith S. D., Borreson Caruso J., The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, Educ. - Cent. Appl. Res, pp. 1-13, (2010)
  • [3] Alhazmi A. K., Rahman A. A., Why LMS failed to support student learning in higher education institutions, (2012)
  • [4] Back D. A., Behringer F., Haberstroh N., Ehlers J. P., Sostmann K., Peters H., Learning management system and e-learning tools: An experience of medical students’ usage and expectations, Int. J. Med. Educ, 7, pp. 267-273, (2016)
  • [5] Ouadoud M., Nejjari A., Chkouri M. Y., El Kadiri K. E., Educational modeling of a learning management system, Proc. 2017 Int. Conf. Electr. Inf. Technol. ICEIT 2017, 2018, pp. 1-6, (2018)
  • [6] Chipps J., Kerr J., Brysiewicz P., Walters F., A Survey of University Student♦_ Perceptions of Learning Management Systems in a Low-Resource Setting Using a Technology Acceptance Model, CIN Comput. Informatics, Nurs, 33, (2015)
  • [7] Ssekakubo G., Suleman H., Marsden G., Designing mobile LMS interfaces: learners’ expectations and experiences, Interact. Technol. Smart Educ, 10, pp. 147-167, (2013)
  • [8] Papadakis S., Kalogiannakis M., Sifaki E., Vidakis N., Access Moodle Using Smart Mobile Phones, A Case Study in a Greek University, pp. 376-385, (2018)
  • [9] Mah D. K., Learning Analytics and Digital Badges: Potential Impact on Student Retention in Higher Education, Technol. Knowl. Learn, 21, 3, pp. 285-305, (2016)
  • [10] Broadbent J., Academic success is about self-efficacy rather than frequency of use of the learning management system, Australas. J. Educ. Technol, 32, 4, pp. 38-49, (2016)