A new method for CBR prediction using fuzzy set theory

被引:0
作者
Cuvalcioglu, Gokhan [1 ]
Taciroglu, Murat Vergi [2 ]
Bal, Arif [3 ]
机构
[1] Mersin Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Math, Mersin, Turkiye
[2] Mersin Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Mersin, Turkiye
[3] Mersin Univ, Vocat Sch Tech Sci, Dept Motor Vehicles & Transportat Technol, Mersin, Turkiye
关键词
CBR prediction; Fuzzy set theory; Fine-sized aggregates; FINE-GRAINED SOILS; BEARING RATIO CBR; NEURAL-NETWORK; REGRESSION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138046
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
California Bearing Ratio (CBR) values of the subgrade soils are key parameters in highway route survey and project design. However, in order to calculate the CBR value, time-consuming and specialized tests must be performed in the laboratory or in the field. In this study, a model based on Fuzzy set theory is proposed to predict the CBR value of soils. The geological characteristics of the fine-sized aggregate in soils are considered as the key parameter in the prediction model.For this purpose, novel Fuzzy membership functions are defined. Logarithmic interpolation approach, which takes into account the Atterberg limits and Proctor parameters of the soils, was used to determine the membership degrees of the gravel and sand sized aggregates forming the soil. The membership degrees of fine-sized aggregates were determined by basic sigmoid membership function according to the type of clay they contain. In order to verify the accuracy of the model, the calculated results were compared with the soaked CBR values obtained from laboratory tests and it was found that there was a high correlation (R2=0.86) between each other. Considering the obtained results together, it was determined that the effect of variables such as the geological class to which the aggregates forming the soil belong, which have the potential to affect the CBR value of the soils, on the results of the CBR prediction models can be eliminated by means of membership functions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Agarwal K.B., 1970, P 2 S E AS C SOIL EN
[2]  
Al-Busultan Shakir, 2020, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, V671, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/671/1/012106
[3]  
Al-Refeai T., 1997, J. King Saud. Univ.-Eng. Sci., V9, P191, DOI [10.1016/S1018-3639(18)30676-7, DOI 10.1016/S1018-3639(18)30676-7, 10.1016/S1018- 3639(18)30676-7.]
[4]   Prediction of CBR Value of Fine Grained Soils of Bengal Basin by Genetic Expression Programming, Artificial Neural Network and Krigging Method [J].
Alam, Sk Kamrul ;
Mondal, Abhijit ;
Shiuly, Amit .
JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2020, 95 (02) :190-196
[5]   Modeling deformation modulus of a stratified sedimentary rock mass using neural network, fuzzy inference and genetic programming [J].
Alemdag, S. ;
Gurocak, Z. ;
Cevik, A. ;
Cabalar, A. F. ;
Gokceoglu, C. .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2016, 203 :70-82
[6]   Analysis and prediction of the effect of Nanosilica on the compressive strength of concrete with different mix proportions and specimen sizes using various numerical approaches [J].
Ali, Reyam ;
Muayad, Maryam ;
Mohammed, Ahmed Salih ;
Asteris, Panagiotis G. .
STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2023, 24 (03) :4161-4184
[7]   Prediction of concrete and FRC properties at high temperature using machine and deep learning: A review of recent advances and future perspectives [J].
Alkayem, Nizar Faisal ;
Shen, Lei ;
Mayya, Ali ;
Asteris, Panagiotis G. ;
Fu, Ronghua ;
Di Luzio, Giovanni ;
Strauss, Alfred ;
Cao, Maosen .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2024, 83
[8]   Surrogate models to predict maximum dry unit weight, optimum moisture content and California bearing ratio form rain size distribution curve [J].
Alzabeebee, Saif ;
Mohamad, Safaa A. ;
Al-Hamd, Rwayda Kh S. .
ROAD MATERIALS AND PAVEMENT DESIGN, 2022, 23 (12) :2733-2750
[9]   Predicting the pile static load test using backpropagation neural network and generalized regression neural network - a comparative study [J].
Alzo'Ubi, A. K. ;
Ibrahim, Farid .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 15 (07) :810-821
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ASTM D1883-99