Quantifying Well Clear Thresholds for UAV in Conjunction with Trajectory Conformity

被引:2
作者
Meng, Linghang [1 ]
Zhang, Hongyang [1 ]
Zhao, Yifei [1 ]
Low, Kin Huat [1 ]
机构
[1] Civil Aviat Univ China, Coll Air Traff Management, Tianjin 300300, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
UAV; collision risk; trajectory conformity; well clear; SAFETY;
D O I
10.3390/drones8110624
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
The rapid advancement of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has introduced new challenges in overseeing and managing their flight operations due to their diverse flight dynamics and performance metrics. To address these complexities, this study introduces a concept of trajectory conformity aimed at enhancing the supervision and control of UAV flights. Trajectory conformity, from a regulatory perspective, is defined as the distribution of deviations between a UAV's actual flight path and its intended trajectory, offering a measure of system-wide operational error. The concept of conformity is hoped to simplify and strengthen the monitoring process to ensure conflict-free drone flying. The present work is also concerned with the development of a comprehensive UAV collision risk model grounded in trajectory conformity analysis. The normality and homogeneity of UAV trajectory deviations are validated by evaluating the trajectory data obtained from real-world UAV flights. Well clear thresholds between two UAVs operating in three orthogonal directions within the same airspace have been established by the developed model. The results obtained demonstrate the effectiveness in omni-encounter scenarios, underscoring the potential to strengthen safety measures. The present work is expected to enhance UAV safety systems, such as detect and avoid (DAA) and unmanned aircraft system traffic management (UTM), by enabling real-time collision warnings within predefined safety thresholds, supporting proactive risk mitigation. Furthermore, the model's versatility allows it to be applied to various UAV operational aspects in future works, including route planning, flight procedure design, airspace capacity assessments, and establishment of separation minima.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Federal aviation regulations fo r flight crew
[2]   Designing airspace for urban air mobility: A review of concepts and approaches [J].
Bauranov, Aleksandar ;
Rakas, Jasenka .
PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2021, 125
[3]  
Bernard J., 2013, Center for Advanced Aviation System Development
[4]   A Unified Collision Risk Model for Unmanned Aircraft Systems [J].
Bijjahalli, Suraj ;
Gardi, Alessandro ;
Pongsakornsathien, Nichakorn ;
Sabatini, Roberto .
2021 IEEE/AIAA 40TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2021,
[5]   Third party risk modelling of Unmanned Aircraft System operations, with application to parcel delivery service [J].
Blom, Henk A. P. ;
Jiang, Chenpeng ;
Grimme, Wouter B. A. ;
Mitici, Mihaela ;
Cheung, Yuk S. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 214
[6]   P-RNAV, safety targets, blunders and parallel route spacing [J].
Brooker, P .
JOURNAL OF NAVIGATION, 2004, 57 (03) :371-384
[7]  
Cook S. P., 2015, 20150481 AIAA, DOI 10.2514/6.2015-0481
[8]   Urban Performance-Based Navigation (uPBN): Addressing the CNS Variation Problem in the Urban Airspace in the Context of UAS Traffic Management [J].
Dai, Wei ;
Deng, Chao .
2023 IEEE 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, ITSC, 2023, :5524-5529
[9]   Probabilistic modeling and reasoning of conflict detection effectiveness by tracking systems towards safe urban air mobility operations [J].
Dai, Wei ;
Quek, Zhi Hao ;
Low, Kin Huat .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2024, 244
[10]   Review of Unmanned Aircraft System Technologies to Enable Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) Operations [J].
Davies, Lee ;
Bolam, Robert Cameron ;
Vagapov, Yuriy ;
Anuchin, Alecksey .
2018 X INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL POWER DRIVE SYSTEMS (ICEPDS), 2018,