Scaling sustainable pig manure treatment: Life cycle assessments for small to large piggeries in China

被引:1
|
作者
Ji, Aimin [1 ]
Guo, Hongyan [2 ]
Li, Ningzhou [3 ]
Zhang, Ning [4 ]
Cheng, Shikun [5 ]
Guan, Jinghua [2 ]
Li, Haiying [2 ]
Hu, Xinting [2 ]
Zhang, Zhenying [6 ]
机构
[1] Tangshan Normal Univ, Ocean Coll, Tangshan 063210, Peoples R China
[2] North China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Met & Energy, Tangshan 063210, Peoples R China
[3] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Environm Technol, Fac Proc Sci 3, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol HUST, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Energy & Environm Engn, Beijing Key Lab Resource Oriented Treatment Ind Po, Xueyuan Rd 30, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[6] North China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Chem Engn, Tangshan 063210, Peoples R China
关键词
Piggery scale; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle cost; Fermentation; Provincial environmental benefits; Carbon emission; MANAGEMENT; WASTE; TECHNOLOGIES; SEWAGE; SLURRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2024.10.023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over 50 % of pig stockpiling and slaughtering in China is attributed to medium and large piggeries. The diverse scales and distributions of these piggeries present significant challenges for the sustainable management of pig manure, with a research gap in assessing the environmental benefits of treatment technologies across different farm sizes. Therefore, the environmental and economic performances of ten pig manure treatment technologies for small, medium and large piggeries were evaluated via life cycle assessment and life cycle costing methods. The black membrane biogas pool (BMBP) technology for medium-scale piggeries demonstrates superior environmental performance, reducing emissions by 44.00 kg CO2 equivalent, 0.36 kg SO2 equivalent, and 0.05 kg PM2.5 equivalent per ton of dry pig manure treated. Additionally, the products generated from this process can offset 2.93 GJ of energy consumption and 0.25 tons of water consumption. Meanwhile, the ectopic microbial fermentation bed technology provides the best economic efficiency, at the cost of only $17.88 per ton. Significant disparities in the scale of piggeries and manure production across provinces necessitate region-specific policies. The estimated global warming potential (GWP) from pig manure treatment nationwide was 5.31 million tons of CO2 equivalent, with Henan, Sichuan, and Hunan provinces accounting for a combined 28.3 % of this total in 2020. Scenario analysis indicates that by 2025, achieving a pig manure utilization rate of 90 % could reduce GWP by 9.1 % (0.5 million tons of CO2 equivalent) compared to an 80 % utilization rate, with reductions ranging from 1.78 % to 22.36 % across other environmental indicators. Promoting technologies such as BMBP and transitioning 5 % of aerobic processes to anaerobic processes could reduce emissions by 2.9 %, while also lowering other environmental indicators by 12.8 % to 20.1 %. The utilization of anaerobic technology, coupled with enhanced utilization rates, can prove more efficacious in mitigating carbon emissions and pollutants.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 178
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prioritizing Organic Pollutants for Shale Gas Exploitation: Life Cycle Environmental Risk Assessments in China and the US
    Chen, Keyan
    Wu, Fan
    Li, Liang
    Zhang, Keshuo
    Huang, Jiehui
    Cheng, Fei
    Yu, Zhiqiang
    Hicks, Andrea L.
    You, Jing
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 58 (19) : 8149 - 8160
  • [42] Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions of typical sewage sludge incineration treatment route based on two case studies in China
    Yang, Hang
    Guo, Yali
    Fang, Ning
    Dong, Bin
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 231
  • [43] Evaluating environmental impacts of pig slurry treatment technologies with a life-cycle perspective
    Yuan, Zengwei
    Pan, Xiao
    Chen, Tianming
    Liu, Xuewei
    Zhang, You
    Jiang, Songyan
    Sheng, Hu
    Zhang, Ling
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 188 : 840 - 850
  • [44] Exploration of sustainable driving path of rural domestic wastewater treatment-from the perspective of life cycle assessment
    Li, Pengyu
    Wang, Yuxin
    Zheng, Tianlong
    Cao, Yingnan
    Lv, Xiuyuan
    Zhou, Xiaoqin
    Zhang, Guangtao
    Ma, Yingqun
    Li, Lin
    Liu, Junxin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [45] Environmental assessment of energy production from anaerobic digestion of pig manure at medium-scale using life cycle assessment
    Ramirez-Islas, Martha E.
    Patricia Guereca, Leonor
    Sosa-Rodriguez, Fabiola S.
    Cobos-Peralta, Mario A.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 102 : 85 - 96
  • [46] Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment options for small and decentralized communities
    Machado, A. P.
    Urbano, L.
    Brito, A. G.
    Janknecht, P.
    Salas, J. J.
    Nogueira, R.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 56 (03) : 15 - 22
  • [47] Examining the interaction of sustainable innovation activity and the life cycle of small high-tech enterprises
    Vaisman, Elena D.
    Podshivalova, Maria, V
    Alola, Andrew Adewale
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (03) : 1018 - 1029
  • [48] Life cycle carbon and cost assessments of the retrofit to Passivhaus EnerPHit standard of suburban residential buildings in Hunan, China
    Liu, Chenfei
    Mohammadpourkarbasi, Haniyeh
    Sharples, Steve
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2025, 332
  • [49] Towards environmentally sustainable water management in Africa: a comprehensive review of life cycle assessment studies in water and wastewater treatment
    Ogbu, Charles Amarachi
    Ivanova, Tatiana Alexiou
    Ewemoje, Temitayo Abayomi
    Alabi, Habeeb Adedotun
    Roubik, Hynek
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2025, 30 (05) : 956 - 979
  • [50] Life-cycle comparisons of economic and environmental consequences for pig production with four different models in China
    Huijun Wu
    Yongxin Liu
    Chengjuan Dai
    Yuanyuan Ye
    Huimin Zhu
    Weixin Fang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 21668 - 21686