Scaling sustainable pig manure treatment: Life cycle assessments for small to large piggeries in China

被引:1
|
作者
Ji, Aimin [1 ]
Guo, Hongyan [2 ]
Li, Ningzhou [3 ]
Zhang, Ning [4 ]
Cheng, Shikun [5 ]
Guan, Jinghua [2 ]
Li, Haiying [2 ]
Hu, Xinting [2 ]
Zhang, Zhenying [6 ]
机构
[1] Tangshan Normal Univ, Ocean Coll, Tangshan 063210, Peoples R China
[2] North China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Met & Energy, Tangshan 063210, Peoples R China
[3] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Environm Technol, Fac Proc Sci 3, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol HUST, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Energy & Environm Engn, Beijing Key Lab Resource Oriented Treatment Ind Po, Xueyuan Rd 30, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[6] North China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Chem Engn, Tangshan 063210, Peoples R China
关键词
Piggery scale; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle cost; Fermentation; Provincial environmental benefits; Carbon emission; MANAGEMENT; WASTE; TECHNOLOGIES; SEWAGE; SLURRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2024.10.023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over 50 % of pig stockpiling and slaughtering in China is attributed to medium and large piggeries. The diverse scales and distributions of these piggeries present significant challenges for the sustainable management of pig manure, with a research gap in assessing the environmental benefits of treatment technologies across different farm sizes. Therefore, the environmental and economic performances of ten pig manure treatment technologies for small, medium and large piggeries were evaluated via life cycle assessment and life cycle costing methods. The black membrane biogas pool (BMBP) technology for medium-scale piggeries demonstrates superior environmental performance, reducing emissions by 44.00 kg CO2 equivalent, 0.36 kg SO2 equivalent, and 0.05 kg PM2.5 equivalent per ton of dry pig manure treated. Additionally, the products generated from this process can offset 2.93 GJ of energy consumption and 0.25 tons of water consumption. Meanwhile, the ectopic microbial fermentation bed technology provides the best economic efficiency, at the cost of only $17.88 per ton. Significant disparities in the scale of piggeries and manure production across provinces necessitate region-specific policies. The estimated global warming potential (GWP) from pig manure treatment nationwide was 5.31 million tons of CO2 equivalent, with Henan, Sichuan, and Hunan provinces accounting for a combined 28.3 % of this total in 2020. Scenario analysis indicates that by 2025, achieving a pig manure utilization rate of 90 % could reduce GWP by 9.1 % (0.5 million tons of CO2 equivalent) compared to an 80 % utilization rate, with reductions ranging from 1.78 % to 22.36 % across other environmental indicators. Promoting technologies such as BMBP and transitioning 5 % of aerobic processes to anaerobic processes could reduce emissions by 2.9 %, while also lowering other environmental indicators by 12.8 % to 20.1 %. The utilization of anaerobic technology, coupled with enhanced utilization rates, can prove more efficacious in mitigating carbon emissions and pollutants.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 178
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison on Environmental Impacts of Dairy Manure Management Methods in China: A Life Cycle Assessment
    Su, Ya
    Liang, Yuying
    Zhuo, Qianting
    Yin, Hongjie
    Fang, Chen
    Han, Lujia
    Huang, Guangqun
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2025,
  • [22] 2G Bioethanol for Sustainable Transport Sector: Review and Analysis of the Life Cycle Assessments
    Umesh, Vijayanand Suryakant
    Moholkar, Vijayanand Suryakant
    CURRENT POLLUTION REPORTS, 2025, 11 (01):
  • [23] Life cycle cost–benefit efficiency of food waste treatment technologies in China
    Ziyao Fan
    Huijuan Dong
    Yong Geng
    Minoru Fujii
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2023, 25 : 4935 - 4956
  • [24] Sustainability evaluation of the large-scale pig farming system in North China: an emergy analysis based on life cycle assessment
    Wang, Xiaolong
    Dadouma, Adamou
    Chen, Yuanquan
    Sui, Peng
    Gao, Wangsheng
    Jia, Lianhai
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 102 : 144 - 164
  • [25] Life cycle carbon emission assessments and comparisons of cast iron and resin mineral composite machine tool bed in China
    Ma, Yan
    Li, Fangyi
    Wang, Liming
    Wang, Geng
    Kong, Lin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 113 (3-4) : 1143 - 1152
  • [26] Life cycle carbon emission assessments and comparisons of cast iron and resin mineral composite machine tool bed in China
    Yan Ma
    Fangyi Li
    Liming Wang
    Geng Wang
    Lin Kong
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 113 : 1143 - 1152
  • [27] Integrated Life Cycle Assessment for Sustainable Remediation of Contaminated Agricultural Soil in China
    Jin, Yuanliang
    Wang, Liuwei
    Song, Yinan
    Zhu, Jin
    Qin, Muhan
    Wu, Longhua
    Hu, Pengjie
    Li, Fangbai
    Fang, Liping
    Chen, Chang
    Hou, Deyi
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 55 (17) : 12032 - 12042
  • [28] Transformation toward precision large-scale operations for sustainable farming: A review based on China's pig industry
    Hasan, Md Kamrul
    Mun, Hong-Seok
    Ampode, Keiven Mark B.
    Lagua, Eddiemar B.
    Park, Hae-Rang
    Kim, Young- Hwa
    Sharifuzzaman, Md
    Yang, Chul-Ju
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED VETERINARY AND ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2024, 11 (04) : 1076 - 1092
  • [29] Comprehensive assessment of food waste treatment emission reduction in China: a life cycle perspective
    Tong Liu
    Hanqiao Liu
    Guoxia Wei
    Hailong Zhao
    Yongyue Gong
    Xin Guo
    Youcheng Zhang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 87669 - 87684
  • [30] Life cycle cost-benefit efficiency of food waste treatment technologies in China
    Fan, Ziyao
    Dong, Huijuan
    Geng, Yong
    Fujii, Minoru
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 25 (06) : 4935 - 4956