Scaling sustainable pig manure treatment: Life cycle assessments for small to large piggeries in China

被引:1
|
作者
Ji, Aimin [1 ]
Guo, Hongyan [2 ]
Li, Ningzhou [3 ]
Zhang, Ning [4 ]
Cheng, Shikun [5 ]
Guan, Jinghua [2 ]
Li, Haiying [2 ]
Hu, Xinting [2 ]
Zhang, Zhenying [6 ]
机构
[1] Tangshan Normal Univ, Ocean Coll, Tangshan 063210, Peoples R China
[2] North China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Met & Energy, Tangshan 063210, Peoples R China
[3] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Environm Technol, Fac Proc Sci 3, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol HUST, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Energy & Environm Engn, Beijing Key Lab Resource Oriented Treatment Ind Po, Xueyuan Rd 30, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[6] North China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Chem Engn, Tangshan 063210, Peoples R China
关键词
Piggery scale; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle cost; Fermentation; Provincial environmental benefits; Carbon emission; MANAGEMENT; WASTE; TECHNOLOGIES; SEWAGE; SLURRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2024.10.023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over 50 % of pig stockpiling and slaughtering in China is attributed to medium and large piggeries. The diverse scales and distributions of these piggeries present significant challenges for the sustainable management of pig manure, with a research gap in assessing the environmental benefits of treatment technologies across different farm sizes. Therefore, the environmental and economic performances of ten pig manure treatment technologies for small, medium and large piggeries were evaluated via life cycle assessment and life cycle costing methods. The black membrane biogas pool (BMBP) technology for medium-scale piggeries demonstrates superior environmental performance, reducing emissions by 44.00 kg CO2 equivalent, 0.36 kg SO2 equivalent, and 0.05 kg PM2.5 equivalent per ton of dry pig manure treated. Additionally, the products generated from this process can offset 2.93 GJ of energy consumption and 0.25 tons of water consumption. Meanwhile, the ectopic microbial fermentation bed technology provides the best economic efficiency, at the cost of only $17.88 per ton. Significant disparities in the scale of piggeries and manure production across provinces necessitate region-specific policies. The estimated global warming potential (GWP) from pig manure treatment nationwide was 5.31 million tons of CO2 equivalent, with Henan, Sichuan, and Hunan provinces accounting for a combined 28.3 % of this total in 2020. Scenario analysis indicates that by 2025, achieving a pig manure utilization rate of 90 % could reduce GWP by 9.1 % (0.5 million tons of CO2 equivalent) compared to an 80 % utilization rate, with reductions ranging from 1.78 % to 22.36 % across other environmental indicators. Promoting technologies such as BMBP and transitioning 5 % of aerobic processes to anaerobic processes could reduce emissions by 2.9 %, while also lowering other environmental indicators by 12.8 % to 20.1 %. The utilization of anaerobic technology, coupled with enhanced utilization rates, can prove more efficacious in mitigating carbon emissions and pollutants.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 178
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Customizing Provincial Sustainable Manure Management Strategies for Small-, Medium-, and Large-Scale Cattle Farms in China
    Ji, Aimin
    Guo, Hongyan
    Zhao, Hailong
    Li, Ningzhou
    Xie, Jinliang
    Zhang, Yi
    Lei, Tianyang
    Cheng, Yingyue
    Zhang, Yandong
    Sun, Baiyang
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (36): : 13475 - 13485
  • [2] Environmental impact and optimization suggestions of pig manure and wastewater treatment systems from a life cycle perspective
    Liu, Binbin
    Zhou, Hao
    Li, Lanfeng
    Ai, Jing
    He, Hang
    Yu, Junxia
    Li, Ping
    Zhang, Weijun
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 905
  • [3] Scenario Setting in Life Cycle Assessments for Wastewater Treatment: A Comprehensive Review
    Lin, Changkun
    Sun, Fengbin
    Gao, Jingsi
    Wu, Jian
    Guo, Fei
    CURRENT POLLUTION REPORTS, 2025, 11 (01):
  • [4] Life cycle assessment of anaerobic digestion of pig manure coupled with different digestate treatment technologies
    Duan, Na
    Khoshnevisan, Benyamin
    Lin, Cong
    Liu, Zhidan
    Liu, Hongbin
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 137
  • [5] A life cycle assessment of liquid pig manure transport in line with EU regulations: A case study from Germany
    Kuhn, T.
    Kokemohr, L.
    Holm-Mueller, K.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 217 : 456 - 467
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of manure management and nutrient recycling from a Chinese pig farm
    Luo, Yiming
    Stichnothe, Heinz
    Schuchardt, Frank
    Li, Guoxue
    Huaitalla, Roxana Mendoza
    Xu, Wen
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2014, 32 (01) : 4 - 12
  • [7] Life cycle assessment and sustainable production evaluation of calcium carbide industry in China
    Huo, Hailong
    Liu, Xunliang
    Wen, Zhi
    Lou, Guofeng
    Dou, Ruifeng
    Su, Fuyong
    Fang, Juan
    Jiang, Zeyi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 360
  • [8] Environmental Assessment of Pig Manure Treatment Systems through Life Cycle Assessment: A Mini-Review
    Ferreira, Jose
    Santos, Lenise
    Ferreira, Miguel
    Ferreira, Antonio
    Domingos, Idalina
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [9] Life cycle assessments for biomass derived sustainable biopolymer & energy co-generation
    Zhang, Dongda
    del Rio-Chanona, Ehecatl Antonio
    Shah, Nilay
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2018, 15 : 109 - 118
  • [10] Life cycle assessment on the environmental impacts of different pig manure management techniques
    Dong, Baocheng
    Song, Chengjun
    Li, Huibin
    Lin, Aijun
    Wang, Jiuchen
    Li, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 15 (03) : 78 - 84