Segmentation of the customers based on customer value: A three-way decision perspective

被引:0
作者
Li, Xiang [1 ]
Xu, Zeshui [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat & Data Sci, Nanchang 330013, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
关键词
Three-way decision; Improved TOPSIS method; Double hierarchy linguistic term; Customer segmentation; THEORETIC ROUGH SETS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112415
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper establishes an innovative value evaluation framework based on the criterion-oriented three-way decision (3WD) in the double hierarchy linguistic term (DHLT) environment to help the customer manager finish customer segmentation. Customer relationship management is the key to the success of enterprises in the information economy era. The segmentation of customers based on their relative criteria can identify the customers who are high-value customers for enterprises. However, multi-criteria decision-making can only display the value ranking of customers, rather than the value segmentation of customers. The employment of 3WD solves this problem. Then we classify the customers based on the 3WD method. First, the criteria are evaluated by using DHLTs, while the weights of criteria are acquired according to the maximum deviation method. Second, the conditional probabilities are estimated by the improved TOPSIS method combined with gray relation analysis, while the threshold values are calculated by the relative utilities which are constructed on the basis of the criterion information. Subsequently, the segmentation of customers is obtained according to the maximum-utility principle. Lastly, case research about the segmentation of customers based on value is used to demonstrate the practicality of our method, while some strategies about customer relationship management are given based on customer segmentation for obtaining maximum returns with minimum investment.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Three-Way Decision Making Based on Data Envelopment Analysis with Interval Data
    Chen, Qinxia
    Liu, Dun
    Zhang, Lu
    COGNITIVE COMPUTATION, 2022, 14 (06) : 2054 - 2073
  • [42] Conflict analysis based on three-way decision for trapezoidal fuzzy information systems
    Li, Xiaonan
    Yang, Yanpo
    Yi, Huangjian
    Yu, Qianqian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, 2022, 13 (04) : 929 - 945
  • [43] A three-way decision model based on cumulative prospect theory
    Wang, Tianxing
    Li, Huaxiong
    Zhang, Libo
    Zhou, Xianzhong
    Huang, Bing
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 519 (519) : 74 - 92
  • [44] Three-way decision-based noise correction for crowdsourcing
    Wu, Xue
    Jiang, Liangxiao
    Zhang, Wenjun
    Li, Chaoqun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2023, 160
  • [45] A three-way decision method in a hybrid decision information system and its application in medical diagnosis
    Li, Zhaowen
    Xie, Ningxin
    Huang, Dan
    Zhang, Gangqiang
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2020, 53 (07) : 4707 - 4736
  • [46] A general conflict analysis model based on three-way decision
    Guangming Lang
    International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2020, 11 : 1083 - 1094
  • [47] ACTIVE LEARNING OF THREE-WAY DECISION BASED ON NEIGHBORHOOD ENTROPY
    Lv, Qiuyue
    Dong, Minggang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE COMPUTING INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 2022, 18 (02): : 377 - 393
  • [48] Normal Fuzzy Three-Way Decision Based on Prospect Theory
    Li, Yanhua
    Liu, Jiafen
    Zhong, Yihua
    Yang, Xin
    ROUGH SETS, IJCRS 2023, 2023, 14481 : 463 - 478
  • [49] Three-way decision with incomplete information based on similarity and satisfiability
    Luo, Junfang
    Hu, Mengjun
    Qin, Keyun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2020, 120 : 151 - 183
  • [50] Generalized three-way decision models based on subset evaluation
    Li, Xiaonan
    Yi, Huangjian
    She, Yanhong
    Sun, Bingzhen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2017, 83 : 142 - 159